Animal Defense Council v. Hodel, 86-2453
Decision Date | 24 February 1989 |
Docket Number | No. 86-2453,86-2453 |
Citation | 867 F.2d 1244 |
Parties | ANIMAL DEFENSE COUNCIL, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Donald P. HODEL, et al., Defendants-Appellees, Southern Arizona Water Resources Association, et al., Defendants-Intervenors- Appellees. |
Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit |
Before HUG, NELSON and NOONAN, Circuit Judges.
We regret that in the opinion, published at 840 F.2d 1432, there was an error made on page 1436, in the second column in the first full paragraph. This paragraph should read as follows:
The district court may also inquire outside of the administrative record "when it appears the agency has relied on documents or materials not included in the record." Public Power Council [v. Johnson], 674 F.2d at 794 [9th Cir. 1982]. In addition, discovery may be permitted if supplementation of the record is necessary to explain technical terms or complex subject matter involved in the agency action. Id.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Friends River v. Probert
...one of the enumerated exceptions. See Animal Def. Council v. Hodel , 840 F.2d 1432, 1438 (9th Cir. 1988) opinion amended by 867 F.2d 1244 (9th Cir. 1989). The limited exceptions are "narrowly construed and applied." Lands Council v. Powell , 395 F.3d 1019, 1030 (9th Cir. 2005). Here, Plaint......
-
Klickitat County v. Columbia River Gorge Com'n, CV-91-3027-AAM.
...before the administrative body at the time of its decision. Animal Defense Council v. Hodel, 840 F.2d 1432, 1436 (9th Cir.1988) corrected 867 F.2d 1244; Friends of the Earth v. Hintz, 800 F.2d 822, 827-829 (9th Cir.1986). Asarco Inc. v. U.S.E.P.A., 616 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir.1980). The district......
-
Environment Now! v. Espy, CV-F-94-5474 OWW.
...to consider a serious environmental consequence, Animal Defense Council v. Hodel, 840 F.2d 1432, 1437 (9th Cir.1988), corrected, 867 F.2d 1244 (9th Cir.1989); or (3) a plaintiff has made a "strong showing" of agency bad faith. Id. Affidavits from experts can be used to explain agency action......
-
Center for Marine Conservation v. Brown
...1432, 1436 (9th Cir.1988) (court may inquire outside the record when necessary to explain the agency's action), opinion amended, 867 F.2d 1244 (9th Cir.1989); cf. Camp, 411 U.S. at 143, 93 S.Ct. at 1244 (where agency's failure to explain its action effectively frustrates judicial review, th......
-
2011 Ninth Circuit environmental review.
...that reviewers may evaluate the comparative merits"). (700) Animal Def. Council v. Hodel, 840 F.2d 1432, 1439 (9th Cir. 1988), amended by 867 F.2d 1244 (9th Cir. (701) Headwaters, Inc. v. U.S. Bureau of Land Mgmt., 914 F.2d 1174, 1181 (9th Cir. 1990) ("[A]n agency's consideration of alterna......
-
CHAPTER 5 APPEALING ROYALTY DECISIONS TO THE INTERIOR BOARD OF LAND APPEALS— PUTTING YOUR BEST CASE FORWARD
...allowing the record to be supplemented. See, e.g., Animal Defense Council v. Hodel, 840 F.2d 1432, 1437-38 (9th Cir. 1988), amended by 867 F.2d 1244 (9th Cir. 1989) (where record suggested agency had a good faith belief in its action); Towns of Norfolk & Walpole, 137 F.R.D. at 188 (holding ......
-
CHAPTER 9 NEPA APPEALS AND LITIGATION: JURISDICTION AND PROCEDURAL ISSUES1
...is applicable to review of agency action under NEPA." Animal Defense Council v. Hodel, 840 F.2d 1432, 1436 (9th Cir. 1988), amended, 867 F.2d 1244 (9th Cir. 1989). However, courts have been willing to admit extra-record evidence to clarify an administrative record, for example to explain an......
-
CHAPTER 12 PROSECUTING ADMINISTRATIVE AND JUDICIAL APPEALS FROM FEDERAL ROYALTY VALUATION AND COLLECTION DECISIONS1
...allowing the record to be supplemented. See, e.g., Animal Defense Council v. Hodel, 840 F.2d 1432, 1437-38 (9th Cir. 1988), amended by 867 F.2d 1244 (9th Cir. 1989) (where record suggested agency had a good faith belief in its action); Towns of Norfolk & Walpole, 137 F.R.D. at 188 (holding ......