Animal Legal Defense Fund, Inc. v. National Ass'n for Biomedial Research, Nos. 97-5009

CourtUnited States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (District of Columbia)
Writing for the CourtPER CURIAM
Citation136 F.3d 829
Parties, 28 Envtl. L. Rep. 20,395 ANIMAL LEGAL DEFENSE FUND, INC., et al., Appellees v. NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH, Appellant.
Docket NumberNos. 97-5009,97-5031,97-5074
Decision Date10 March 1998

Page 829

136 F.3d 829
329 U.S.App.D.C. 89, 28 Envtl. L. Rep. 20,395
ANIMAL LEGAL DEFENSE FUND, INC., et al., Appellees
v.
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH, Appellant.
Nos. 97-5009, 97-5031, 97-5074.
United States Court of Appeals,
District of Columbia Circuit.
March 10, 1998.

Before EDWARDS, C.J.; WALD, SILBERMAN, WILLIAMS, GINSBURG, SENTELLE, HENDERSON, RANDOLPH, ROGERS, TATEL and GARLAND, Circuit Judges.

Prior report: 130 F.3d 464.

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Upon consideration of appellees' Suggestion For Rehearing In Banc, the responses thereto, and the vote by a majority of the judges of the court in regular active service in favor of the suggestion, it is

ORDERED that the suggestion be granted. These cases will be reheard by the court sitting in banc. The judgment filed herein on December 9, 1997 is hereby vacated. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that an order governing further proceedings will issue separately.

To continue reading

Request your trial
1 practice notes
  • U.S. v. Grice, No. Crim. 3:98-759-19.
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 4th Circuit. United States District Court of South Carolina
    • November 12, 1998
    ...suggest[ing] that disclosure of the matters in question ... would be permissible under the terms of 18 U.S.C. §§ 2511 and 2515...." 136 F.3d at 829. 9. The Court concurs with Justice Scalia's observations concerning the use of legislative The law is what the law says, and we should con......
1 cases
  • U.S. v. Grice, No. Crim. 3:98-759-19.
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 4th Circuit. United States District Court of South Carolina
    • November 12, 1998
    ...way suggest[ing] that disclosure of the matters in question ... would be permissible under the terms of 18 U.S.C. §§ 2511 and 2515...." 136 F.3d at 829. 9. The Court concurs with Justice Scalia's observations concerning the use of legislative The law is what the law says, and we should cont......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT