Ankeny v. Lieuallen

Decision Date10 June 1941
Citation169 Or. 206,113 P.2d 1113
PartiesANKENY v. LIEUALLEN et al.
CourtOregon Supreme Court

Appeal from Circuit Court, Umatilla County; C. L. Sweek, Judge.

Suit by John D. Ankeny, as agent for the shareholders of the First Inland National Bank of Pendleton, Oregon, as substituted for Raymond L. Elliott, as receiver of the First Inland National Bank of Pendleton, Oregon, against Harriet E. Lieuallen, a widow, and others to foreclose a mortgage a real estate. From a decree for plaintiff, the defendants appeal.

Decree set aside and reversed.

John F. Kilkenny, of Pendleton (Raley, Kilkenny &amp Raley, of Pendleton, on brief), for appellants.

Homer I. Watts, of Athena, and George R. Lewis, of Pendleton, for respondent.

RAND Justice.

This is an appeal from a decree foreclosing a mortgage on 320 acres of farm land in Umatilla County, Oregon. The mortgage was given on October 17, 1932, by James T. Lieuallen and his second wife to the First Inland National Bank of Pendleton. The plaintiff, as agent for the shareholders of the bank, was substituted for the receiver of the bank.

The one question is whether, under the terms of a contract entered into between Lieuallen and his deceased former wife and the mutual wills by them executed in pursuance of said contract he had a lawful right to encumber this property with a mortgage. If he had no such power, then the lien of the mortgage against the land is invalid and unenforceable.

It is admitted that, on June 10, 1918, James T. Lieuallen and Lucy I. Lieuallen, his former wife who has since died and whose will has been probated and whose estate he has since received, entered into the following contract in writing:

"We James T. Lieuallen and Lucy I. Lieuallen, husband and wife hereby agree as follows:

"That we will make and execute with due and legal formalities a joint will to our property, willing all the real and personal property to each other during the lifetime of the survivor, and will nominate the survivor as the executor of executrix of the said will without requiring bonds;

that the survivor shall have the sole and exclusive handling of the property and each and every part thereof, but will not be empowered to sell any of the farm lands, but will be allowed and empowered to sell all personal property of every kind or nature, the lands belonging to the estate known as the 'Mountain Land' and any city property which may be owned by each of us at the time of the death of one of us. The survivor is to have all of the rents, issues and profits of the farm lands and to use the same as he or she may dictate. We, however, jointly suggest that the overplus over a sufficient amount to reasonably maintain the survivor, be converted into farm property or loaned upon farm security.

"In the event of the purchase of any additional farm lands out of the proceeds of the sale of the Mountain Land or the personal property, or the rents, issues and profits, the same shall be kept as intact as the present farm lands. After the death of the survivor of us, and at the time of the youngest child arriving at the age of majority, the land shall be divided share and share alike among our children, Lawrence L. Lieuallen, Fred A. Lieuallen, Stella Lieuallen, James T. Lieuallen, Jr., Ethel Bayne, Lucy I. Woodward, Ravella L. Lieuallen, Paul Lieuallen and Francis C. Lieuallen; the sons and daughters shall be allowed to select and occupy parts of the lands as a home, but they shall never be allowed under the will to sell, mortgage, hypothecate or encumber any of the lands during their lifetime. The land shall be apportioned by choice, with the first choice to the youngest child and the other choices following in the order of their seniority. In the event of the death of any of the children, leaving issue of his or her body prior to our death, the share which would go to the parent shall be governed so far as the selling, encumbering or otherwise disposing of the same by the same rule as the other children, that is, the grandchildren during their lifetime will not be allowed to sell, hypothecate, or encumber the property, and in the event of the children not being able to divide the farm lands amicably they shall select three disinterested persons who shall make a distribution of the lands, which shall then be subject to choice in the manner provided herein. The lands which are occupied by each child shall be under the exclusive charge and jurisdiction of that child and he or she shall in no event be required to account for any use, occupancy of rents, issues and profits of the premises.

"The land at the time of the death of the children, except in the event of the death of a child prior to our death, shall vest in fee simple in the grandchildren. In the event of the trust not being fully completed on the death of the survivor of us the two eldest children are hereby nominated as trustees to complete the administration, without requiring bonds for security for the discharge of their trust, and it being our desire that no compensation for such service be paid other than necessary Court costs and attorney fees.

"It is understood that nothing herein shall prevent mutually the making of a new will or the making of a new agreement, either or both, but our said wills may under no circumstances be changed or altered after the death of one of us.

"In Witness Whereof we have hereunto set our hands and seals this 10th day of May, 1918.

"J. T. Lieuallen (Seal)
"Lucy I. Lieuallen (Seal)

"Witnesses:

"C. M. Comstock

"J. G. Thomas."

It is also admitted that, on the same day, in conformity with said contract, both Mr. and Mrs. Lieuallen executed a mutual or reciprocal will, each containing the same identical terms as those contained in the other with the sole exception that the names of the parties were transposed and the words "husband" and "wife" were substituted for each other wherever the same was proper. Mrs. Lieuallen's will reads as follows:

"Know All Men by these Presents: That I, Lucy I. Lieuallen, now of Walla Walla, Washington, but lately of Umatilla County Oregon, being of sound mind and memory and not suffering under duress, menace, fraud or undue influence of any person or persons whatsoever, and judging it best to make, hereby do make this my last will and testament:

"It is my will that my debts and that the charges of my funeral be paid as soon as conveniently may be after my decease, and I leave the charge of my funeral to the direction of my family.

"Having heretofore made an agreement with my husband, James T. Lieuallen, as to the disposition of our community

property, now in confirmation of such agreement I give and devise all of my estate, real and personal, in the following manner, to-wit:

"All of my property, real, personal, or mixed of whatever the same may consist or wherever the same may be found, I give, devise and bequeath to my beloved husband, James T. Lieuallen, to have and to hold the same during the term of his natural life, giving and granting unto my said husband the sole and exclusive handling of the property and each and every part thereof, but not empowering my said husband to sell any of the agricultural property of which we are possessed at all times, however, giving and granting to my said husband the right to sell any or all personal property of every kind or nature, and also to sell that part of our estate known as the 'Mountain Land' and which land is not agricultural property, and also to sell any city property or town lots which may be owned by me or by us at the time of my death. My said husband shall have all of the rents, issues and profits of the farm lands and shall have the right to use the same as he may desire. I, however, strongly recommend and suggest that all overplus over a sufficient amount reasonably necessary to maintain my said husband and such of our family as reside with him be converted into farm property or loaned upon the security of mortgage upon agricultural property, and in the event that additional farm lands shall be purchased out of the proceeds of the mountain land or personal property, or from the rents, issues, and profits, I desire that the same shall be kept as intact as the present farm lands.

"After the death of my husband, provided that at such time our youngest child shall have arrived at the age of majority, I direct that the real estate in which I and my husband are interested shall be divided share and share alike among our children, to-wit: an undivided one-ninth (1-9) to each of the following named sons and daughters: Lawrence L. Lieuallen, Fred A. Lieuallen, Stella Lieuallen, James T. Lieuallen, Jr., Ethel Bayne, Lucy I. Woodward, Ravella L. Lieuallen, Paul Lieuallen and Francis C. Lieuallen.

"It is my direction that with the consent of my said husband and by mutual agreement that our sons and daughters shall each be allowed to select and occupy parts of the farm lands as a home; provided, however, that it is not the intention of this indenture, nor is it my will that any of our said children shall be allowed or permitted to sell mortgage, hypothecate or encumber any of the lands during their lifetime, and in the apportionment of lands to each of our children, it is my desire that the land shall be divided into parcels of the same value as near as may be, this apportionment to be made either by mutual agreement among the heirs, or in case of inability among the heirs the portioning of said land to be performed by three disinterested parties appointed by the Court having jurisdiction of my estate, and then after said lands shall have been parcelled I direct that the youngest child shall have first choice as to the parcel he or she may desire, and thereupon each of the children in the order of...

To continue reading

Request your trial
13 cases
  • Kirk v. Beard, A-7857
    • United States
    • Texas Supreme Court
    • March 29, 1961
    ...662; Turnipseed v. Sirrine, 57 S.C. 559, 35 S.E. 757; Brown v. Webster, 90 Neb. 591, 134 N.W. 185, 37 L.R.A.,N.S., 1196; Ankeny v. Lieuallen, 169 Or. 206, 113 P.2d 1113, 127 P.2d 735; Findley v. Johnson, Mo.1940, 142 S.W.2d 61; Lugauer v. Husted, 228 Mich. 76, 199 N.W. 682; Schramm v. Burkh......
  • Schaad v. Lorenz
    • United States
    • Oregon Court of Appeals
    • July 11, 1984
    ...has benefitted, courts will enforce the contract. Florey, et al. v. Meeker, et al., 194 Or. 257, 240 P.2d 1177 (1952); Ankeny v. Lieuallen, 169 Or. 206, 113 P.2d 1113, 127 P.2d 735 (1942); Taylor v. Wait, supra. The fact that Matilda lived more than 30 years after executing the 1946 will do......
  • Irwin v. First Nat. Bank of Portland (Or.)
    • United States
    • Oregon Supreme Court
    • January 29, 1958
    ...Before considering the contentions of the defendants, we will briefly state the applicable rules of law. From Ankeny v. Lieuallen, 169 Or. 206, 218, 113 P.2d 1113, 1117, 127 P.2d 735, we take the 'The doctrine that where, pursuant to a contract, a husband and wife, or any two persons, make ......
  • Kerper v. Kerper
    • United States
    • Wyoming Supreme Court
    • September 1, 1989
    ...v. Brown, 215 Or. 714, 335 P.2d 847, 850, reh. denied and opinion clarified 215 Or. 714, 337 P.2d 358 (1959); Ankeny v. Lieuallen, 169 Or. 206, 113 P.2d 1113, 1118 (1941), dismissed on rehearing 169 Or. 206, 127 P.2d 735 In these cases, Wes Kerper wanted the assets in Hazel Kerper's estate ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT