Anketell v. Kulldorff
| Decision Date | 30 November 2021 |
| Citation | Anketell v. Kulldorff, 340 Conn. 905, 263 A.3d 821 (Conn. 2021) |
| Parties | Beth E. ANKETELL v. Martin KULLDORFF |
| Court | Connecticut Supreme Court |
Campbell D. Barrett, Jon T. Kukucka and Johanna S. Katz, Hartford, in support of the petition.
Scott T. Garosshen and Kenneth J. Bartschi, Hartford, in opposition.
The defendant's petition for certification to appeal from the Appellate Court, 207 Conn. App. 807, 263 A.3d 972, is denied.
McDONALD, J., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
3 cases
-
Mitchell v. Bogonos
... ... appreciation in value of their respective estates." ... (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Anketell v ... Kulldorff, 207 Conn.App. 807, 834-35, 263 A.3d 972, ... cert, denied, 340 Conn. 905, 263 A.3d 821 (2021) ... ...
-
Pac. Funding Tr. 1002 v. Stephenson Residential Servs.
... ... 911, 259 ... A.3d 654 (2021). We, therefore, decline to consider the ... argument. See Anketell v. Kulldorff, 207 Conn.App ... 807, 822, 263 A.3d 972, cert, denied, 340 Conn. 905, 263 A.3d ... 821 (2021). Second, even if we were to ... ...
-
Anketell v. Kulldorff
...funds.1 This court affirmed the judgment; Anketell v. Kulldorff, 207 Conn. App. 807, 810, 263 A.3d 972, cert. denied, 340 Conn. 905, 263 A.3d 821 (2021); and our Supreme Court denied the defendant’s petition for certification to appeal on November 30, 2021. Anketell v. Kulldorff, 340 Conn. ......