Anne Arundel Cnty. v. Bell, 605 Sept.Term 2013

Decision Date21 March 2014
Docket NumberNo. 605 Sept.Term 2013,605 Sept.Term 2013
Citation437 Md. 422,86 A.3d 1274
PartiesAnne Arundel County v. Bell
CourtMaryland Court of Appeals
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE

Reported below: 215 Md.App. 161, 79 A.3d 976.

Disposition: Granted.

To continue reading

Request your trial
2 cases
  • Anne Arundel Cnty. v. Bell
    • United States
    • Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
    • April 21, 2015
    ...to comprehensive zoning?3. Whether noise from a predicted increase in traffic constitutes “special damages”?Anne Arundel County v. Bell, 437 Md. 422, 86 A.3d 1274 (2014) (granting certiorari). We answer the first two questions in the negative. Accordingly, no answer to the third question is......
  • Anne Arundel Cnty. v. Bell
    • United States
    • Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
    • April 21, 2015
    ...to comprehensive zoning?3. Whether noise from a predicted increase in traffic constitutes "special damages"? Anne Arundel County v. Bell, 437 Md. 422, 86 A.3d 1274 (2014) (granting certiorari). We answer the first two questions in the negative. Accordingly, no answer to the third question i......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT