Annee v. State, 770S159

• Decision Date: 03 August 1971
• Docket Number: No. 770S159,770S159
• Citation: 256 Ind. 686,271 N.E.2d 711
• Court: Indiana Supreme Court
• Parties: Louis M. ANNEE et al., Appellants, v. STATE of Indiana, Appellee.

Page 711

271 N.E.2d 711

256 Ind. 686

Louis M. ANNEE et al., Appellants, v. STATE of Indiana, Appellee.

No. 770S159.

Supreme Court of Indiana.

Aug. 3, 1971.

James L. Brand, Greenfield, for appellants.

Theodore L. Sendak, Atty., Gen., Darrel K. Diamond, Deputy Atty. Gen., Indianapolis, for appellee.

HUNTER, Judge.

This is an appeal from a condemnation proceeding brought by the State of Indiana for the purpose of acquiring for highway construction approximately thirty-six (36) acres of an eighty-one (81) acre tract owned by the appellants on which there was a nine hole golf course, club house, and swimming pool. The State of Indiana filed its complaint pursuant to IC 1971, 32--11--1--2, (Ind.Ann.Stat. § 3--1702 (1968 Repl.)), and the Marion County Superior Court appointed appraisers. The appraisers' report set damages at three hundred ninety thousand eight hundred and thirty-one dollars ($390,831.00). Amended complaints were filed by appellee, and appellants filed an answer to appellee's fourth amended complaint. The Marion County Superior Court filed twenty-six (26) instructions to be given the appraisers pursuant to the appellee's fourth amended complaint. The appraisers' report then set damages in the amount of four hundred twenty eight thousand dollars ($428,000.00). Both appellants and appellee filed exceptions to the report. Trial by jury was had in Hadcock Circuit Court. Testimony at trial as to damages ranged from one hundred seventy one thousand seven hundred dollars ($171,700.00) to five hundred forty-one thousand dollars ($541,000.00). The jury returned a verdict setting the amount of damages at two hundred ten thousand dollars ($210,000.00). This is an appeal from that verdict.

This court has jurisdiction of this appeal by virtue of IC 1971, 33--3--2--7 (Ind.Ann.Stat. § 4--214 (1968 Repl.)), which requires that appeals of condemnation proceedings for the appropriation of lands for public use be taken directly to the Supreme Court of Indiana.

The issues presented for review are that the damages assessed and awarded to the appellants were inadequate and that the amount of such damages was not supported by substantial evidence.

Concerning the question of the adequacy of damages, the instant case is much like Van Sickle v. Kokomo Water Works Company (1959), 239 Ind. 612, 158 N.E.2d 460. On that occasion, this court said:

'With regard to appellant's contention that the measure of damages was too small, this court will consider only the evidence most favorable to appellee in determining whether the assessment of damages in favor of the appellant was too small. Mackey v. State, 1942, 220 Ind. 607, 611, 45 N.E.2d 205; Swallow Coach Lines, Inc. v. Cosgrove, 1938, 214 Ind. 532, 538, 15 N.E.2d 92; Trammel v. Briant, 1900, 25 Ind.App. 375, 378, 58 N.E. 206; Chmielewski's Estate v. Chmielewski, 1936, 102 Ind.App. 20, 23, 200 N.E. 747.

Upon the question of damages, appellant argues at great length that the jury failed to consider the value of gravel deposits on said land. However, the evidence regarding the commercial value, if any, of such deposits was in sharp dispute. Therefore we are obliged to accept the evidence most favorable to appellee on this subject. Appellee's witness placed appellant's damages, on an average, at $38,607. The damages assessed by the jury were $69,792. Under the evidence, we cannot say that, as a matter of law, the damages assessed were too small.' 239 Ind. at 616--617, 158 N.E.2d at 462--463.

In the instant case, the testimony concerning damages was sharply in conflict. Appellee had two qualified witnesses concerning damages, one of whom set damages at one hundred seventy-one thousand seven hundred dollars ($171,700.00) and the other placed them at one hundred eighty-nine thousand five hundred dollars ($189,500.00). The damages awarded by the jury were two hundred ten thousand dollars ($210,000.00). Therefore, accepting the evidence most favorable to appellee, we cannot say that the damages assessed were too small, as a matter of law.

Appellants' second contention is that the amount of damages assessed was not supported by substantial evidence. We cannot agree. It is the well established rule in Indiana that this court will not disturb an award for damages when the amount is within the bounds of the...