Anthony v. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Ry. Co.

Decision Date31 October 1882
CitationAnthony v. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Ry. Co., 76 Mo. 18 (Mo. 1882)
CourtMissouri Supreme Court
PartiesANTHONY v. THE ST. LOUIS, IRON MOUNTAIN & SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY, Appellant.

Appeal from Madison Circuit Court.--HON. J. H. NICHOLSON, Judge.

AFFIRMED.

Bennett Pike and Geo. H. Benton for appellant.

B. B. Cahoon for respondent.

HENRY, J.

This suit originated in a justice's court, in Madison county, and was for double damages for the alleged killing of plaintiff's mare, by one of defendant's trains of cars. A judgment by default was rendered against defendant by the justice, from which defendant appealed to the circuit court, where, on a trial by the court, a jury having been waived, plaintiff again obtained judgment, from which defendant has appealed to this court. There was evidence to show that the mare got on the track of defendant's road through a pair of bars at a farm crossing, placed there by the company for the use of the farm; that the bars had been out of repair for a long time, and their condition had been reported to the company; that the bars were three planks high, and the top plank was so short that it barely touched the post, so as to be easily thrown off by the wind; that the two planks were off when the mare was found dead. No instructions were asked by plaintiff; no declarations of law were made by the court, and the court refused one asked by the defendant to the effect, that after it has erected a fence on the sides of its road, and it is broken down, defendant has a reasonable time to find out its condition and repair it, before its liability begins.

It is sufficient to dispose of the point made by appellant on the...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
6 cases
  • State v. Anderson
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • 30 Abril 1885
    ...reason why defendants' instruction “called for in the bill of exceptions” and identified as letter “D,” was refused. 77 Mo. 474; 78 Mo. 73; 76 Mo. 18.” The defendants' motion in arrest, also copied in this record, at least, impliedly shows that instructions were given for defendants. The fi......
  • Fairgrieve v. City of Moberly
    • United States
    • Kansas Court of Appeals
    • 6 Febrero 1888
    ...497; State v. Burnett, 81 Mo. 120; State v. Emory, 79 Mo. 461; State v. Preston, 77 Mo. 294; Wakefield v. Richardson, 77 Mo. 589; Anthony v. Railroad, 76 Mo. 18; Rucker Rucker, 59 Mo. 17; Matlock v. Williams, 59 Mo. 105; Wetherall v. Harris, 51 Mo. 65; Brady v. Connelly, 52 Mo. 19; Carver v......
  • Snell v. Harrison
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • 31 Octubre 1884
    ...for it was not called to the attention of the trial court in the motion for a new trial. Lancaster v. W. L. Ins. Co., 62 Mo. 121; Anthony v. Ry. Co., 76 Mo. 18. RAY, J. This is a suit in equity to set aside certain deeds vesting the title to certain real estate in controversy in defendant, ......
  • White v. Caldwell
    • United States
    • Missouri Court of Appeals
    • 19 Mayo 1885
    ...such as the giving or refusing of instructions ( Matlock v. Williams, 59 Mo. 105; State ex rel. v. Richardson, 77 Mo. 589; Anthony v. Railroad Co., 76 Mo. 18), or admitting or rejecting evidence.-- Carver v. Thornhill, 53 Mo. 283, 286. The leading case on this rule of practice as it has exi......
  • Get Started for Free