Appeal of Barnell

Decision Date04 May 1935
Docket Number32220.
PartiesAppeal of BARNELL.
CourtKansas Supreme Court

Syllabus by the Court.

Statute attempting to confer on probate court authority to grant wife power to alienate homestead where husband has been adjudged insane held to violate Constitution prohibiting alienation of homestead without joint consent of husband and wife (Rev. St Supp. 1933, 39--211, 39--221; Const. art. 15, § 9).

Where a husband has been adjudged insane, the provisions of R. S 1933 Supp. 39-- 211 and 39--221, in so far as they attempt to confer on the probate court authority to grant to the wife who is sane, power to alienate the homestead, are held to be in violation of article 15 of section 9 of the Constitution.

Appeal from District Court, Wyandotte County, Division No. 3; William H. McCamish, Judge.

Donald C. Little, Hugh E. Brownfield, Errett P. Scrivner, Harold H Harding, and O. Q. Claflin, III, all of Kansas City, for appellant.

Roland Boynton and W. D Kimble, both of Topeka, amici curiae.

SMITH Justice.

This was a proceeding pursuant to R. S. 1933 Supp. 39--211 and 39--221. The probate court and on appeal the district court held these two sections are in violation of article 15 of section 9 of the Constitution of the state. The applicant under those two sections appeals.

The facts are all admitted. On November 24, 1931, Harry Barnell was adjudged to be insane. He was committed to one of the state hospitals. Letters of guardianship were issued to Margaret Barnell, his wife. On or about January 6, 1933, Margaret bought in her own name a house and lot in Kansas City. She bought this property on the partial-payment plan. After making certain payments, she found herself unable to continue. She and her daughter have been and are now occupying the property as a home. She is now attempting to refinance her purchase of the property through the Home Owners' Loan Corporation. This will require the execution of a mortgage.

R. S. 1933 Supp. 39--211 provides as follows: "Whenever the personal estate of any such person shall be insufficient for the discharge of his debts, the maintenance of himself and family or the education of his children, or whenever said real estate shall be unproductive or an expense upon the estate, the guardian may apply to the probate court by which he was appointed, praying authority to mortgage, lease or sell, the whole, or so much of the real estate of such person as shall be necessary: Provided, however, That if the property sought to be mortgaged, leased or sold shall be the homestead of said incompetent person the court shall not enter any order upon said application unless the husband or wife of said incompetent, as the case may be, shall have first filed with the court a written consent to said application: And provided further, That no guardian's deed executed by virtue of such an order shall be valid unless such husband or wife of said incompetent shall join in the deed as one of the grantors therein."

R. S 1933 Supp. 39--221 provides as follows: "When any such person is a married woman or married man, and not having the property in her or his own right or name, it shall be lawful for her or his guardian, jointly with the husband or wife of such person, to sell, convey or mortgage any real estate, and such sale, conveyance or mortgage shall be valid when ordered and approved by the probate court, without the proceedings being had required by the provisions of this act; and in case of any foreign guardian of any such nonresident person, who has complied with section 39--218 of the Revised Statutes of 1923, such foreign guardian shall be authorized to sell, convey or mortgage any such real estate, jointly with the husband or...

To continue reading

Request your trial
3 cases
  • Bradley v. Hall
    • United States
    • Kansas Supreme Court
    • June 12, 1948
    ...194 P.2d 943 165 Kan. 358 BRADLEY v. HALL et al. No. 37218.Supreme Court of KansasJune 12, 1948 ... Appeal ... from District Court, Atchison County; Lawrence F. Day, Judge ... Action ... by Lloyd K. Bradley, guardian of Ora M. Bradley, an ... (Locke v. Redmond, 6 Kan.App. 76, 49 P. 670; ... Iles v. Benedict, 110 Kan. 200, 203 P. 925 [and ... earlier cases there cited]; In re Barnell's ... Estate, 141 Kan. 842, 44 P.2d 214; Steinkirchner v ... Linscheid, 164 Kan. 179, 182, 185, 186, 188 P.2d 960), ... there can be no question ... ...
  • Starke v. Starke
    • United States
    • Kansas Supreme Court
    • May 9, 1942
    ... ... on the homestead of the ward. Held, the district court was ... without jurisdiction of the subject matter ... Appeal ... from District Court, Barton County; Clyde Allphin, Judge Pro ... Action ... by Carson Starke against Myrtle E. Starke, an insane ... The ... above statutes of 1925 and 1927 (G. S.1935, 39-211, 39-221) ... were before this court in the case of In re Barnell's ... Estate, 141 Kan. 842, 44 P.2d 214. Margaret Barnell had ... been appointed guardian of her husband's estate who had ... been adjudged ... ...
  • Tincknell v. Tincknell
    • United States
    • Kansas Supreme Court
    • May 4, 1935
    ... ... bankrupt in a proceeding in bankruptcy voluntarily instituted ... by him was properly denied ... Appeal ... from District Court, Montgomery County; Joseph W. Holdren, ... Action ... by Maurice M. Tincknell against Effie Tincknell, wherein ... ...
1 books & journal articles
  • Kansas Homestead Law
    • United States
    • Kansas Bar Association KBA Bar Journal No. 65-04, April 1996
    • Invalid date
    ...[FN230]. Locke, 6 Kan. App. 76. [FN231]. Petersen, 108 Kan. at 342. [FN232]. Locke, 6 Kan. App. at 82. [FN233]. In re Appeal of Barnell, 141 Kan. 842, 44 P.2d 214 (1935). [FN234]. Bradley v. Hall, 165 Kan. 358, 361, 194 P.2d 943 (1948); Steinkirchner v. Linscheid, 164 Kan. 179, 188 P.2d 960......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT