Applegate v. Dowell

Decision Date16 January 1889
Citation20 P. 429,17 Or. 299
PartiesAPPLEGATE v. DOWELL.
CourtOregon Supreme Court

Appeal from circuit court, Douglas county.

For opinion on former appeal, see 16 P. 651.

(Syllabus by the Court.)

The decision of this court becomes the law of the case, and, upon a second appeal, is binding upon the court and the parties, and from which the court is not at liberty to depart.

R. & E.B. Williams and J.W. Hamilton, for respondent.

James F. Watson and B.F. Dowell, for appellant.

STRAHAN, J.

When this cause was before this court on the former appeal, ( Applegate v. Dowell, 15 Or. 513, 16 P. 651,) the law applicable to the facts then presented was fully stated and discussed. The cause was tried as an action at law, under the act of 1885, and, finding error, this court remanded the case for a new trial. Upon the second trial no new facts that were material were developed, and the court below simply applied the principles of law announced by this court to the facts as they appeared, which resulted in a decree for the plaintiff, from which the defendant has appealed.

Upon this appeal we are not at liberty to depart from the law announced in the case on the previous appeal. The decision then made became the law of the case, binding alike upon the court and the parties on any subsequent appeal. Powell v. Railroad Co., 14 Or. 22, 12 P. 83; 1 Herm.Estop. p. 118, note 1.

To continue reading

Request your trial
12 cases
  • Johnson v. Ladd
    • United States
    • Oregon Supreme Court
    • 18 d2 Julho d2 1933
    ...P. 280, 282; Kane v. Rippey, 22 Or. 299, 29 P. 1005; Murphy v. City of Albina, 22 Or. 106, 29 P. 353, 29 Am. St. Rep. 578; Applegate v. Dowell, 17 Or. 299, 20 P. 429; Thompson v. Hawley, 16 Or. 251, 19 P. 84; v. Dayton, etc., R. R. Co., 14 Or. 22, 12 P. 83. Assignments three, four, and five......
  • Cranston v. West Coast Life Ins. Co.
    • United States
    • Oregon Supreme Court
    • 30 d2 Junho d2 1914
    ... ... L. O. L. § 756; Powell v. D. S. & G ... R. R. Co., 14 Or. 22, 12 P. 83; Thompson v ... Hawley, 16 Or. 251, 19 P. 84; Applegate v ... Dowell, 17 Or. 299, 20 P. 429; Kane v. Rippey, ... 22 Or. 299, 29 P. 1005; Portland Trust Co. v ... Coulter, 23 Or ... ...
  • Dowell v. Applegate
    • United States
    • U.S. Supreme Court
    • 5 d1 Março d1 1894
    ...Pac. 651,) and another hearing was had, resulting in a decree for complainant. Thereupon, defendant appealed, and the decree was affirmed. 20 Pac. 429. He then sued out this writ of This case involves the title to a tract of land in Douglas county, Or., containing 40 acres, part of what is ......
  • Reed v. Hollister
    • United States
    • Oregon Supreme Court
    • 30 d2 Janeiro d2 1923
    ... ... Powell v. Dayton, etc., ... Co., 14 Or. 22, 12 P. 83; Thompson v. Hawley, ... 16 Or. 251, 19 P. 84; Applegate v. Dowell, 17 Or ... 299, 20 P. 429; Murphy v. City of Albina, 22 Or ... 106, 29 P. 353, 29 Am. St. Rep. 578; Kane v. Rippey, ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT