Applegate v. Dowell
Decision Date | 16 January 1889 |
Citation | 20 P. 429,17 Or. 299 |
Parties | APPLEGATE v. DOWELL. |
Court | Oregon Supreme Court |
Appeal from circuit court, Douglas county.
For opinion on former appeal, see 16 P. 651.
(Syllabus by the Court.)
The decision of this court becomes the law of the case, and, upon a second appeal, is binding upon the court and the parties, and from which the court is not at liberty to depart.
R. & E.B. Williams and J.W. Hamilton, for respondent.
James F. Watson and B.F. Dowell, for appellant.
When this cause was before this court on the former appeal, ( Applegate v. Dowell, 15 Or. 513, 16 P. 651,) the law applicable to the facts then presented was fully stated and discussed. The cause was tried as an action at law, under the act of 1885, and, finding error, this court remanded the case for a new trial. Upon the second trial no new facts that were material were developed, and the court below simply applied the principles of law announced by this court to the facts as they appeared, which resulted in a decree for the plaintiff, from which the defendant has appealed.
Upon this appeal we are not at liberty to depart from the law announced in the case on the previous appeal. The decision then made became the law of the case, binding alike upon the court and the parties on any subsequent appeal. Powell v. Railroad Co., 14 Or. 22, 12 P. 83; 1 Herm.Estop. p. 118, note 1.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Johnson v. Ladd
...P. 280, 282; Kane v. Rippey, 22 Or. 299, 29 P. 1005; Murphy v. City of Albina, 22 Or. 106, 29 P. 353, 29 Am. St. Rep. 578; Applegate v. Dowell, 17 Or. 299, 20 P. 429; Thompson v. Hawley, 16 Or. 251, 19 P. 84; v. Dayton, etc., R. R. Co., 14 Or. 22, 12 P. 83. Assignments three, four, and five......
-
Cranston v. West Coast Life Ins. Co.
... ... L. O. L. § 756; Powell v. D. S. & G ... R. R. Co., 14 Or. 22, 12 P. 83; Thompson v ... Hawley, 16 Or. 251, 19 P. 84; Applegate v ... Dowell, 17 Or. 299, 20 P. 429; Kane v. Rippey, ... 22 Or. 299, 29 P. 1005; Portland Trust Co. v ... Coulter, 23 Or ... ...
-
Dowell v. Applegate
...Pac. 651,) and another hearing was had, resulting in a decree for complainant. Thereupon, defendant appealed, and the decree was affirmed. 20 Pac. 429. He then sued out this writ of This case involves the title to a tract of land in Douglas county, Or., containing 40 acres, part of what is ......
-
Reed v. Hollister
... ... Powell v. Dayton, etc., ... Co., 14 Or. 22, 12 P. 83; Thompson v. Hawley, ... 16 Or. 251, 19 P. 84; Applegate v. Dowell, 17 Or ... 299, 20 P. 429; Murphy v. City of Albina, 22 Or ... 106, 29 P. 353, 29 Am. St. Rep. 578; Kane v. Rippey, ... ...