Applestein v. United Board and Carton Corporation
Decision Date | 13 June 1960 |
Docket Number | No. A--124,A--124 |
Citation | 161 A.2d 474,33 N.J. 72 |
Parties | Benjamin APPLESTEIN et al., Plaintiffs-Respondents, v. UNITED BOARD AND CARTON CORPORATION, a New Jersey corporation, et al., Defendants-Respondents, and Saul L. Epstein and Interstate Container Corporation, Defendants-Appellants. Martha U. BEUERLEIN, etc., Plaintiff-Respondent, v. UNITED BOARD & CARTON CORPORATION et al., Defendants-Respondents, and Saul L. Epstein et al., Defendants-Appellants. |
Court | New Jersey Supreme Court |
On appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court, Chancery Division, whose opinion is reported at 60 N.J.Super. 333, 159 A.2d 146.
Daniel G. Kasen, Newark, argued the cause for appellants (Kasen, Schnitzer & Kasen, Newark, attorneys; Morris M. Schnitzer, Newark, of counsel).
David Friedenberg, Union City, argued the cause for respondents Francis X. Conway and others (Maurice C. Brigadier, Jersey City, attorney).
Philip J. Albert, Trenton, argued the cause for respondent Benjamin Applestein (Levy, Levy & Albert, Trenton, attorneys).
Isadore Glauberman, Jersey City, argued the cause for respondent United Board & Carton Corp. (Sheldon A. Weiss, Jersey City, on the brief).
Raymond Chasan, Jersey City, argued the cause for respondents Martha U. Beuerlein and others (Levy, Lemken & Margulies, Jersey City, attorneys; Seymour Margulies, Jersey City, of counsel).
The judgment is affirmed essentially for the reasons given in the opinion of Judge Kilkenny in the court below.
For affirmance: Chief...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Turner v. Bituminous Cas. Co.
...context of shareholder rights. See Applestein v. United Board & Carton Corp., 60 N.J.Super. 333, 159 A.2d 146, 151 (1960), Aff'd 33 N.J. 72, 161 A.2d 474 (1960). Most of these policies may fairly be said to have arisen from case law, and are not specifically found in the While the Legislatu......
-
Ramirez v. Amsted Industries, Inc.
...12 (1st Cir. 1974); Appelstein v. United Board & Carton Corp., 60 N.J.Super. 333, 349-53, 159 A.2d 146 (Ch.Div.), aff'd o. b., 33 N.J. 72, 161 A.2d 474 (1960) (finding merger or consolidation in order to insure dissenting stockholders their appraisal Strict interpretation of the traditional......
-
Cargo Partner Ag v. Albatrans Inc.
...a previous New Jersey case, Applestein v. United Board & Carton Corp., 60 N.J.Super. 333, 342, 159 A.2d 146 (Ch.Div.1960), aff'd 33 N.J. 72, 161 A.2d 474 (1960), had noted as being present in the corporate plan at issue. Applestein had said that those seven factors comprised "every factor p......
-
Knapp v. North Am. Rockwell Corp.
...N.E.2d 507 (1963).9 Applestein v. United Board & Carton Corp., 60 N.J.Super. 333, 159 A.2d 146, 151 (Ch. 1960) aff'd per curiam 33 N.J. 72, 161 A.2d 474 (1960). Accord Freeman v. Hiznay, 349 Pa. 89, 36 A.2d 509 (1944); 15 W. Fletcher, Cyclopedia of the Law of Private Corporations 7040-41 (1......