Applestein v. United Board and Carton Corporation

Decision Date13 June 1960
Docket NumberNo. A--124,A--124
Citation161 A.2d 474,33 N.J. 72
PartiesBenjamin APPLESTEIN et al., Plaintiffs-Respondents, v. UNITED BOARD AND CARTON CORPORATION, a New Jersey corporation, et al., Defendants-Respondents, and Saul L. Epstein and Interstate Container Corporation, Defendants-Appellants. Martha U. BEUERLEIN, etc., Plaintiff-Respondent, v. UNITED BOARD & CARTON CORPORATION et al., Defendants-Respondents, and Saul L. Epstein et al., Defendants-Appellants.
CourtNew Jersey Supreme Court

On appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court, Chancery Division, whose opinion is reported at 60 N.J.Super. 333, 159 A.2d 146.

Daniel G. Kasen, Newark, argued the cause for appellants (Kasen, Schnitzer & Kasen, Newark, attorneys; Morris M. Schnitzer, Newark, of counsel).

David Friedenberg, Union City, argued the cause for respondents Francis X. Conway and others (Maurice C. Brigadier, Jersey City, attorney).

Philip J. Albert, Trenton, argued the cause for respondent Benjamin Applestein (Levy, Levy & Albert, Trenton, attorneys).

Isadore Glauberman, Jersey City, argued the cause for respondent United Board & Carton Corp. (Sheldon A. Weiss, Jersey City, on the brief).

Raymond Chasan, Jersey City, argued the cause for respondents Martha U. Beuerlein and others (Levy, Lemken & Margulies, Jersey City, attorneys; Seymour Margulies, Jersey City, of counsel).

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed essentially for the reasons given in the opinion of Judge Kilkenny in the court below.

For affirmance: Chief...

To continue reading

Request your trial
27 cases
  • Turner v. Bituminous Cas. Co.
    • United States
    • Michigan Supreme Court
    • December 1, 1974
    ...context of shareholder rights. See Applestein v. United Board & Carton Corp., 60 N.J.Super. 333, 159 A.2d 146, 151 (1960), Aff'd 33 N.J. 72, 161 A.2d 474 (1960). Most of these policies may fairly be said to have arisen from case law, and are not specifically found in the While the Legislatu......
  • Ramirez v. Amsted Industries, Inc.
    • United States
    • New Jersey Supreme Court
    • June 18, 1981
    ...12 (1st Cir. 1974); Appelstein v. United Board & Carton Corp., 60 N.J.Super. 333, 349-53, 159 A.2d 146 (Ch.Div.), aff'd o. b., 33 N.J. 72, 161 A.2d 474 (1960) (finding merger or consolidation in order to insure dissenting stockholders their appraisal Strict interpretation of the traditional......
  • Cargo Partner Ag v. Albatrans Inc.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Southern District of New York
    • March 13, 2002
    ...a previous New Jersey case, Applestein v. United Board & Carton Corp., 60 N.J.Super. 333, 342, 159 A.2d 146 (Ch.Div.1960), aff'd 33 N.J. 72, 161 A.2d 474 (1960), had noted as being present in the corporate plan at issue. Applestein had said that those seven factors comprised "every factor p......
  • Knapp v. North Am. Rockwell Corp.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Third Circuit
    • December 27, 1974
    ...N.E.2d 507 (1963).9 Applestein v. United Board & Carton Corp., 60 N.J.Super. 333, 159 A.2d 146, 151 (Ch. 1960) aff'd per curiam 33 N.J. 72, 161 A.2d 474 (1960). Accord Freeman v. Hiznay, 349 Pa. 89, 36 A.2d 509 (1944); 15 W. Fletcher, Cyclopedia of the Law of Private Corporations 7040-41 (1......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT