Applestein v. United Board and Carton Corporation

• Decision Date: 13 June 1960
• Docket Number: No. A--124,A--124
• Citation: Applestein v. United Board and Carton Corporation, 161 A.2d 474, 33 N.J. 72 (N.J. 1960)
• Parties: Benjamin APPLESTEIN et al., Plaintiffs-Respondents, v. UNITED BOARD AND CARTON CORPORATION, a New Jersey corporation, et al., Defendants-Respondents, and Saul L. Epstein and Interstate Container Corporation, Defendants-Appellants. Martha U. BEUERLEIN, etc., Plaintiff-Respondent, v. UNITED BOARD & CARTON CORPORATION et al., Defendants-Respondents, and Saul L. Epstein et al., Defendants-Appellants.
• Court: New Jersey Supreme Court

Page 72

33 N.J. 72

161 A.2d 474

Benjamin APPLESTEIN et al., Plaintiffs-Respondents, v. UNITED BOARD AND CARTON CORPORATION, a New Jersey

corporation, et al., Defendants-Respondents,

and

Saul L. Epstein and Interstate Container Corporation,

Defendants-Appellants.

Martha U. BEUERLEIN, etc., Plaintiff-Respondent, v. UNITED BOARD & CARTON CORPORATION et al.,

Defendants-Respondents, and Saul L. Epstein et

al., Defendants-Appellants.

No. A--124.

Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Argued June 6, 1960.

Decided June 13, 1960.

On appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court, Chancery Division, whose opinion is reported at 60 N.J.Super. 333, 159 A.2d 146.

Daniel G. Kasen, Newark, argued the cause for appellants (Kasen, Schnitzer & Kasen, Newark, attorneys; Morris M. Schnitzer, Newark, of counsel).

David Friedenberg, Union City, argued the cause for respondents Francis X. Conway and others (Maurice C. Brigadier, Jersey City, attorney).

Philip J. Albert, Trenton, argued the cause for respondent Benjamin Applestein (Levy, Levy & Albert, Trenton, attorneys).

Isadore Glauberman, Jersey City, argued the cause for respondent United Board & Carton Corp. (Sheldon A. Weiss, Jersey City, on the brief).

Raymond Chasan, Jersey City, argued the cause for respondents Martha U. Beuerlein and others (Levy, Lemken & Margulies, Jersey City, attorneys; Seymour Margulies, Jersey City, of counsel).

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed essentially for the reasons given in the opinion of Judge Kilkenny in the court below.

For affirmance: Chief Justice ...