Application Of Gottsmann, 222.

Decision Date29 January 1948
Docket NumberNo. 222.,222.
Citation57 A.2d 31
PartiesApplication of GOTTSMANN et al.
CourtNew Jersey Supreme Court

OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE

Appeal from Court of Chancery.

Proceeding in the matter of the application of August Gottsmann and Mary Greb on behalf of Joseph Gottsmann, Sr., for writ of habeas corpus. From an order discharging an order to show cause why writ of habeas corpus should not issue and denying application therefor, the petitioners appeal.

Affirmed.

Charles Blume, of Newark, for appellants.

Feld & Breitner, of Newark (Samuel B. Feld, of Newark, of counsel), for respondents, Joseph Gottsmann, Jr., and Elsa Gottsmann.

PER CURIAM.

This appeal is from an order of the Chancellor, upon the advice of Vice-Chancellor Stein, discharging an order to show cause why a writ of habeas corpus should not issue and denying an application therefor.

Our examination of the record leads to the conclusion that reasonable cause was not shown. The writ of habeas corpus is a writ of right when reasonable cause is shown, but not a writ of course. 39 C.J.S., Habeas Corpus, § 6.

The order under review is affirmed with costs.

For affirmance: THE CHIEF JUSTICE, Justices BODINE, DONGES, HEHER, COLIE, WACHENFELD, EASTWOOD and BURLING, and Judges WELLS, DILL, FREUND, McLEAN and SCHETTINO-13.

For reversal: None.

To continue reading

Request your trial
3 cases
  • Ex parte Zee
    • United States
    • New Jersey County Court
    • 19 avril 1951
    ...to be a writ of right, when cause is shown for its issuance. In re Thompson, 85 N.J.Eq. 221, 96 A. 102 (Ch.1915); In re Gottsmann, 141 N.J.Eq. 271, 57 A.2d 31 (E. & A.1948). If it be true that decision to issue the writ rests in the sound judicial discretion of the court, as a matter of fai......
  • State v. Cynkowski
    • United States
    • New Jersey Superior Court — Appellate Division
    • 30 avril 1952
    ...is a writ of right when reasonable cause is shown, but not a writ of course. 39 C.J.S., Habeas Corpus, § 6.' In re Gottsmann, 141 N.J.Eq. 271, 57 A.2d 31, 32 (E. & A.1948). And such was Blackstone's opinion: 'If a probable ground be shown that the party is imprisoned without just cause, the......
  • Rose v. Raleigh Fitkin-paul Morgan Mem'l Hosp.-ann May Found..
    • United States
    • New Jersey Supreme Court
    • 29 janvier 1948

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT