Application of Ogiue, Patent Appeal No. 74-539.
Decision Date | 30 June 1975 |
Docket Number | Patent Appeal No. 74-539. |
Parties | Application of Katumi OGIUE. |
Court | U.S. Court of Customs and Patent Appeals (CCPA) |
Paul M. Craig, Jr., Washington, D. C., attorney of record, for appellant.
Joseph F. Nakamura, Washington, D. C., for the Commissioner of Patents, R. V. Lupo, Washington, D. C., of counsel.
Before MARKEY, Chief Judge and RICH, BALDWIN, LANE and MILLER, Judges.
This appeal is from the decision of the Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) Board of Appeals affirming the final rejection of claims 10-19 (see Appendix), all the claims remaining in appellant's application, serial No. 870,946, filed October 8, 1969,1 entitled "Manufacture of Semiconductor Device." We affirm.
In the manufacture of integrated semiconductor circuits, the art prefers to isolate electrically the several regions on the surface of the semiconductor chip from one another by means of reverse-biased PN junctions. According to appellant, this was done before his invention by epitaxially depositing a monocrystalline layer of one conductivity type on a monocrystalline substrate of a second conductivity type, and then selectively diffusing an impurity through the epitaxial layer down to the surface of the substrate, so as to define an annular or grid-like region of the first conductivity type on the substrate of the second conductivity type. The disadvantage of this method is that the decrease of impurity concentration as the diffused layer deepens prevents adequate isolation unless the diffusion treatment is effected at high temperatures or for long periods of time, which causes auto-doping of the epitaxial layer by the impurities in the substrate.
Appellant claims to have invented an improved electrical isolation technique, embodied in a semiconductor device fabricated in accordance with his invention. His specification says:
The gist of this invention resides in that a plurality of monocrystalline semiconductor layers and a polycrystalline semiconductor layer integrally and contiguously provided between said monocrystalline semiconductor layers are formed on a surface of a material serving as a substrate, and that said monocrystalline layers (these layers are used to define circuit elements or as means for providing a desired circuit function) are electrically isolated from each other by said substrate and said polycrystalline layer. To this end, a region of an opposite conductivity type to that of said monocrystalline layers is included in said polycrystalline layer. The formation of this opposite conductivity type region is effected by virtue of the nature of an impurity that is diffused at a high speed into the polycrystalline semiconductor layer (that is, the fact that it has a high diffusion coefficient).
Fig. 3 of the application illustrates in part the manufacture of appellant's device:
Silicon dioxide (SiO2) layers 21 are deposited through a mask onto a P-type monocrystalline substrate 1. The substrate is then placed in a reaction furnace, through which flows a silicon halide (SiCl4) gas containing an N-type impurity, so that a semiconductor silicon layer is epitaxially deposited on the surface of the substrate. Over the SiO2 layers 21 grow polycrystalline regions 42; a monocrystalline layer 41 grows over the remainder of the substrate. Fig. 4 shows what is done next:
Another SiO2 film 22 is deposited onto the surface of the epitaxial layer, and then is partially etched away to expose, inter alia, the semiconductor surface directly over the SiO2 layers 21. Thereafter, a P-type impurity is thermally diffused into the device, creating P-type circuit elements 51a and 51b as well as P-type isolating layers 52 and isolating PN junctions 53. Thus, the formerly N-type polycrystalline regions 42 (Fig. 3) have been changed to P-type regions 52 (Fig. 4). Since impurities diffuse through polycrystalline regions much more rapidly than through monocrystalline regions, P-type isolating regions 52 may be grown through the N-type epitaxial layer down to the P-type substrate 1 without corresponding penetration to the substrate of circuit elements 51a and 51b.
Iwata et al. (Iwata) 3,475,661 Oct. 28, 1969 Manasevit et al (Manasevit) 3,393,088 July 16, 1968 Doo 3,386,865 June 4, 1968
The application that matured into the Iwata patent was filed in the United States on February 6, 1967, which was after appellant's Japanese priority date. Iwata's invention provides electrical isolation of semiconductor elements by including in otherwise monocrystalline epitaxial layers polycrystalline regions into which impurities are diffused to produce PN junctions between the polycrystalline and monocrystalline portions. The Iwata specification and drawings explain the invention more fully (emphasis ours):
Having produced his polycrystalline regions 13 and having diffused them to produce PN junctions, Iwata describes how he can produce semiconductor devices as follows, referring to Fig. 5 of his drawings:
As will be explained later, the examiner and the board used, in the rejection of appellant's claims, claims 1-5 of Iwata, which read as follows:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Application of Wertheim
...for what they disclose in their entireties and not merely for their inventive contributions to the art. In re Ogiue, 517 F.2d 1382, 1387, 186 USPQ 227, 232 (Cust. & Pat.App.1975). Pfluger 1963, in a portion carried forward to the patent, discloses the Advantageously, in following the teachi......
-
Application of McKellin
... 529 F.2d 1324 . Application of Wilbur H. McKELLIN, et al. . Patent Appeal No. 75-539. . United States Court of Customs and Patent Appeals. . ...See In re Ogiue, 517 F.2d 1382 (Cust. & Pat.App. 1975). Therein we held that an ......
-
In re Baxter, Appeal No. 80-574.
...the "continuing vitality of the doctrine of interference estoppel ... in appropriate factual settings." In re Ogiue, 517 F.2d 1382, 1390, 186 USPQ 227, 234 (Cust. & Pat.App.1975). Such factual settings necessarily include notice and opportunity to be The examiner's Decision on Motions of Se......
-
Application of Suska, Appeal No. 78-586.
...first inventor in deciding the prior art issue. In In re Yale, 347 F.2d 995, 52 CCPA 1668, 146 USPQ 400 (1965), and In re Ogiue, 517 F.2d 1382, 186 USPQ 227 (CCPA 1975), a concession by the appellant of another's priority rendered the counts proper prior art under § 103. In In re Taub, 348 ......