Application of Oppenauer

Decision Date26 June 1944
Docket NumberPatent Appeal No. 4907.
Citation143 F.2d 974,62 USPQ 297
PartiesApplication of OPPENAUER.
CourtU.S. Court of Customs and Patent Appeals (CCPA)

Henry C. Parker, of Washington, D. C., for appellant.

George Foulkes, of Washington, D. C., for Alien Property Custodian.

W. W. Cochran, of Washington, D. C. (E. L. Reynolds, of Washington, D. C., of counsel), for the Commissioner of Patents.

Before GARRETT, Presiding Judge, and BLAND, HATFIELD, and JACKSON, Associate Judges.

JACKSON, Associate Judge.

This is an appeal from a decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office affirming that of the Primary Examiner rejecting claims 64, 66, 68, 69, 72, 75, 78, 80 and 84 of an application for a patent on a "Process for Oxidizing Unsaturated Polycyclic Alcohols," on the ground that they are broader than warranted by the disclosure. No references are relied on. Six claims were allowed.

The invention is described in the statement of the examiner as follows:

"The invention in this case consists in a process for producing unsaturated polycyclic ketones of the cyclopentanopolyhydrophenanthrene series by subjecting a keto-secondary alcohol of said series to the action of a catalyst of the class consisting of aluminum tertiary alcoholates and magnesium tertiary alcoholates in the presence of excess of an organic compound selected from the group consisting of aldehydes and ketones."

Claims 64, 68 and 84 are illustrative of the involved subject matter and read as follows:

"64. The process or manufacturing polycyclic ketones which comprises subjecting a secondary alcohol of the cyclopentano-polyhydrophenanthrene series in which it is theoretically possible for at least one hydroxyl group to be replaced by a keto group to the action of an excess of an organic compound selected from the group consisting of aldehydes and ketones in the presence of a metal alcoholate of a tertiary alcohol."

"68. The process of manufacturing polycyclic ketones which comprises subjecting an unsaturated polycyclic alcohol in which it is theoretically possible for at least one hydroxyl group to be replaced by a keto group to the action to an excess of an organic compound selected from the group consisting of aldehydes and ketones in the presence of an alcoholate selected from a class consisting of the tertiary aluminum and chloro-magnesium alcoholates."

"84. The process of manufacturing polycyclic ketones which comprises subjecting an unsaturated secondary polycyclic alcohol of the cyclopentano-polyhydrophenanthrene series to the action of an organic compound selected from a class consisting of aldehydes and ketones in the presence of a tertiary alcoholate selected from a class consisting of the aluminum and chloro-magnesium alcoholates, the reaction taking place in an inert solvent and at a temperature ranging from 50° to 140° C."

Subsequent to the final rejection by the examiner and prior to his statement, appellant filed an affidavit by a highly skilled scientist purporting to show that the disclosure of the application was sufficient basis for broad claims. The examiner held the affidavit to have no pertinence in that the disclosure in an application was not subject to change of scope by means of affidavits either as to facts or opinion. The Board of Appeals made no mention of the affidavit.

The tribunals below rejected claim 64 on the ground that it failed to define "secondary alcohol" as being unsaturated, claims 66, 68 and 78 because of the breadth of the definition of the alcohols, and claims 64, 66, 69, 72, 75, 80 and 84 because the definition of the catalyst was not in accordance with the disclosure.

Appellant in his brief lays great stress upon the affidavit, which sets out the affiant's interpretation of appellant's...

To continue reading

Request your trial
12 cases
  • Application of Surrey
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Customs and Patent Appeals (CCPA)
    • 15 December 1966
    ...related that extrapolation of the activity of the dichlorophenyl compound to the various heterocycles is warranted. (In re Oppenauer, 143 F.2d 974, 31 CCPA 1248; Am. Chem. Paint Co. v. Firestone, 6 Cir., 117 F.2d The board formulated its own statement of the rejection which, however, does n......
  • In re Robins
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Customs and Patent Appeals (CCPA)
    • 13 August 1970
    ...aryl, much less to alkyl and then "organo." Precedent, in the form of such decisions particularly as In re Surrey supra * * * and In re Oppenauer, 31 CCPA 1248 * * * 143 F.2d 974, 62 USPQ 297 (1944), cited therein, are believed clear to this We find the examiner's Answer to be singularly un......
  • Application of Grimme
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Customs and Patent Appeals (CCPA)
    • 9 February 1960
    ...sufficiently identified in an application by "other appropriate language." In re Dreshfield, 110 F.2d 235, 27 CCPA 1013; In re Oppenauer, 143 F.2d 974, 31 CCPA 1248. What constitutes "other appropriate language" within the meaning of the cited cases will, of course, depend on the circumstan......
  • Application of Smyth
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Customs and Patent Appeals (CCPA)
    • 5 June 1951
    ...specification would not compensate this deficiency." The Board of Appeals declined to consider the affidavits, citing In re Oppenauer, 143 F.2d 974, 976, 31 C.C.P.A., Patents, We there said: "* * * It is wellsettled law that testimony will not be received for the purpose of explaining the d......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT