Application of Radio Corp. of America

Decision Date03 June 1953
Docket NumberPatent Appeals No. 5962.
Citation205 F.2d 180,98 USPQ 157
PartiesApplication of RADIO CORP. OF AMERICA.
CourtU.S. Court of Customs and Patent Appeals (CCPA)

John A. Wortmann, New York City, for appellant.

E. L. Reynolds, Washington, D. C., for the Commissioner of Patents.

Before GARRETT, Chief Judge, and O'CONNELL, JOHNSON, WORLEY, and COLE, Judges.

WORLEY, Judge.

This is an appeal by the Radio Corporation of America, hereinafter referred to as appellant, from a decision of the Commissioner of Patents affirming the denial by the examiner of appellant's application for registration of the slogan "The Music You Want When You Want It" under section 3 of the Lanham Act, Trade-Mark Act of 1946, 15 U.S.C.A. § 1053. That section reads as follows:

"Sec. 3. Service marks registrable
"Subject to the provisions relating to the registration of trade-marks, so far as they are applicable, service marks used in commerce shall be registrable, in the same manner and with the same effect as are trade-marks, and when registered they shall be entitled to the protection provided herein in the case of trade-marks, except when used so as to represent falsely that the owner thereof makes or sells the goods on which such mark is used. The Commissioner may establish a separate register for such service marks. Applications and procedure under this section shall conform as nearly as practicable to those prescribed for the registration of trade-marks." 15 U.S. C.A. § 1053.

The Patent Office refused to register the involved slogan as a service mark on the ground that the slogan was used by appellant in the advertising or sale of its goods rather than in the advertising or sale of its services, as required by the statute.

From the record it appears that the appellant manufactures phonograph records, prepares "package" radio programs of thirty minute length, and claims use since 1937 of the involved slogan in connection with those programs. Appellant declares the programs are devoted principally to playing "the very best musical classics" and are heard over approximately two hundred radio stations. Appellant pays the stations for the time employed in presenting its programs and has an agreement with them that only the records manufactured by it; namely, Victor records, provided without cost to the stations, are to be used on the programs. Appellant also designates the schedules of the broadcasts, the order in which the records are played, and specifies that the involved slogan shall be used as the title of the programs.

Several radio scripts accompany the application for registration. Based on an examination of their contents, we believe a fair description of a representative program offered by appellant is substantially as follows: The program begins with an announcement that "His Master's Voice Is On The Air," immediately followed by "The Music You Want When You Want It in a program of Victor Red Seal Records." Then comes a brief discussion of the nature of the music to be played, something of the background of the composer and the character of his work, immediately following which appropriate selections are played. At the conclusion of the program, reference is made to the fact that the music is recorded on Victor Red Seal Records, and occasionally one of those records is further identified by its album number.

Appellant contends here, as below, that such activities constitute a "service" within the meaning of sections 3, supra, and 45 infra; that the slogan used in connection therewith is therefore entitled to registration as a service mark; and that the Patent Office erred in denying its application.

In considering appellant's position, we turn to section 45 of the Trade-Mark Act of 1946 which reads as follows:

§ 45. Construction and definitions;
* * * * * *
"Service mark. The term `service mark\' means a mark used in the sale or advertising of services to indentify the services of one person and distinguish them from the services of others and includes without limitation the marks, names, symbols, titles, designations, slogans, character names, and distinctive features of radio or other advertising used in commerce." 15 U.S. C.A. § 1127. (Italics ours.)

Prior to the enactment of the Lanham Act, no statutory authority was available to protect the owners of service marks as such. In making provision for their registration, Congress enacted section 3, supra, and to make clear its intention succinctly defined the meaning of the term in section 45, supra.

As this court stated in the case of In re Lyndale Farm, 186 F.2d 723, 726, 38 C.C.P.A., Patents, 825, "A trade-mark's function is to identify and distinguish a product, whereas a trade name's function is to identify and distinguish...

To continue reading

Request your trial
13 cases
  • Quality Courts United v. Quality Courts
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Middle District of Pennsylvania
    • March 15, 1956
    ...Courts in Class 100"; "Courts" was disclaimed from the mark in its entirety.3 See and cf. 15 U.S.C.A. § 1053; Application of Radio Corporation of America, 1953, 205 F.2d 180, 40 C.C.P.A.Patents, 1025; Springfield Fire & Marine Ins. Co. v. Founders' Fire & Marine Ins. Co., D.C.N.D.Cal.S.D.19......
  • Slep-Tone Entm't Corp. v. Coyne
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Northern District of Illinois
    • September 30, 2015
    ...Sound Choice tracks. Defendants argue that "promotion of one's own goods is not a service," Doc. 163 at 3 (citing In re Radio Corp. of America, 205 F.2d 180 (C.C.P.A.1953) ), and in so arguing they are correct. See Murphy, 923 F.2d at 927 ("[T]he theme of Murphy's advertising campaign is no......
  • Murphy v. Provident Mut. Life Ins. Co. of Philadelphia
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Second Circuit
    • January 22, 1991
    ... ... F.2d 1217, 1221 (2d Cir.1987); American Television & Communications Corp. v. American Communications & Television, Inc., 810 F.2d 1546, 1548 (11th ... Clearly, the term does not apply to goods or products. Application of Radio Corp. of America, 40 C.C.P.A ... Page 927 ... 1025, 205 F.2d ... ...
  • Savannah Coll. of Art v. Sportswear, Inc.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Eleventh Circuit
    • October 3, 2017
    ...927 (2d Cir. 1990) ("Clearly, the term ['services' in the Lanham Act] does not apply to goods or products."); Application of Radio Corp. of Am. , 205 F.2d 180, 182 (C.C.P.A. 1953) ("Clearly had Congress intended service marks to apply to goods or products, we believe it would have so stated......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT