Application of Riddle
Decision Date | 11 March 1971 |
Docket Number | Patent Appeal No. 8457. |
Citation | 169 USPQ 45,438 F.2d 618 |
Parties | Application of John B. RIDDLE, Arndt B. Bergh and Charles O. Forge. |
Court | U.S. Court of Customs and Patent Appeals (CCPA) |
Karl A. Limbach, John P. Sutton, Limbach, Limbach & Sutton, San Francisco, Cal., attorneys of record, for appellant.
S. Wm. Cochran, Washington, D. C., for the Commissioner of Patents. Jere W. Sears, Washington, D. C., of counsel.
Before RICH, ALMOND, BALDWIN and LANE, Judges, and FORD, Judge, United States Customs Court, sitting by designation.
This appeal is from the decision of the Patent Office Board of Appeals affirming the examiner's rejection of the sole claim in appellants' application1 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as obvious in view of Smith.2
The invention relates to a method for determining whether or not a sample paper bill is a genuine Federal Reserve Note. Those notes, said to constitute most of the paper money now in circulation in the United States, have one side printed in green ink. The other side, printed mostly in black ink, has a seal imprinted on it to the left of the portrait, which seal denotes the Federal Reserve Bank that issued the note. While the major portion of the printing on the black side, including a pattern of lines forming the background for the portrait, is printed with magnetic (magnetizable) ink, the ink used to impress the seal is non-magnetic. Appellants' method utilizes these characteristics in a manner readily apparent from the claim, which reads:
1. The method of recognizing a sample bill as a valid piece of U. S. paper money which comprises: magnetically analyzing the ink in a predetermined area on the obverse side of the sample bill; magnetically analyzing the Federal Reserve Seal on the sample bill, and rejecting the sample bill as a valid piece of U. S. currency where magnetic ink is either not found in said predetermined area or is found in the area of the Federal Reserve Seal.
Smith states that certain portions of the paper currency of the United States are printed with ink that has magnetic properties. In particular, the reference points out that the backgrounds of darker tone which set off the portraits distinctive of the denomination of the currency are formed from black vertical and horizontal lines, which are "usually" formed from such ink. The patent discloses a method for recognizing authentic bills which includes testing to determine whether the aforementioned background area of a sample has the expected magnetic properties.
On the basis of the Smith disclosure, the examiner took the position that it would be obvious to add to the Smith test of an area known to be printed in magnetic ink, the additional step of testing for the presence of magnetic ink in any area known to be printed in nonmagnetic ink, including the area of the Federal Reserve Seal. In sustaining the rejection, the board commented:
OPINIONWe agree with the examiner and the board that the claimed method is obvious in view of Smith. That patent not only teaches that portions of paper currency are printed in magnetic ink, but also that "it is the ink in the black face that is magnetic." It also states that the magnetic properties of the ink are "limited" and discloses that the test apparatus be designed to reject any spurious bills that have "unduly strong magnetic ink" as well as any that have "insufficiently strong magnetic ink." With Smith's disclosure before him, a person of ordinary skill in the art who...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Ex parte Hyatt
... Ex parte GILBERT P. HYATT Appeal No. 2002-0652 Application No. 08/465, 072 United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board September 25, 2003 ... This ... mean that that language is correct and does not control the ... outcome of this case. See In re Riddle , 438 F.2d ... 618, 620, 169 U.S.P.Q. 45, 47 (CCPA 1971) ("two wrongs ... cannot make a right"). The same applies to an ... ...
-
Xilinx, Inc. v. Intellectual Ventures Management
... ... question at the time of the invention, i.e., as of the ... effective filing date of the patent application." ... Phillips v. AWH Corp., 415 F.3d 1303, 1313 (Fed ... Cir. 2005) (en banc). It is improper, when in giving claims ... their ... cases, especially when different factual situations are ... involved."); In re Riddle, 438 F.2d ... 618, 620 (CCPA 1971 (rejecting applicant's argument that ... "the allowance of a claim by an examiner in a patent is ... ...
-
Ex parte Li, Appeal 2007-1348
... ... We have ... jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 6(b) ... The ... application on appeal was filed on 27 August 2003 ... The ... application on appeal is said to be a continuation of ... application ... party is irrelevant to patentability on direct appeal in ... other case even if references are the same); In re ... Riddle, 438 F.2d 618, 169 U.S.P.Q. 45 (CCPA 1971) (an ... examiner's allowance of claim in patent does not bar ... rejection of claim in ... ...
-
Ex parte C. Cowles & Co.
...U.S.C. § 302) or (2) a petition to institute an inter partes review (35 U.S.C. § 311), neither of which were available at the time Manson, Riddle, and Fessenden v. Coe were V. Decision Upon consideration of the appeal, and for the reasons given herein, it is ORDERED that the decision of the......