AR Game & Fish Comm'n v. United States
Docket Number | 11-597 |
Decision Date | 04 December 2012 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 7-day Trial
218 cases
-
Nekrilov v. City of Jersey City
...expectations are "the law in force in the State in which the property is located," Ark. Game & Fish Comm'n v. United States , 568 U.S. 23, 38, 133 S.Ct. 511, 184 L.Ed.2d 417 (2012) (citing Lucas , 505 U.S. at 1027–29, 112 S.Ct. 2886 ), as well as whether the government invited the activity ......
-
Surfrider Found. v. Martins Beach 1, LLC
...with property" that are considered per se (or "categorical") takings. ( Arkansas Game & Fish Commission v. United States (2012) 568 U.S. 23, 31, 133 S.Ct. 511, 184 L.Ed.2d 417 ( Arkansas Game ); see also Lingle , supra , 544 U.S. at p. 538, 125 S.Ct. 2074 ; Powell v. County. of Humboldt (20......
-
Long v. State
...interference with property is a taking." 2013 S.D. 13, ¶ 10, 827 N.W.2d at 61 (quoting Ark. Game & Fish Comm'n v. United States, 568 U.S. 23, 31, 133 S.Ct. 511, 518, 184 L.Ed.2d 417 (2012) ). "Instead, the viability of a takings claim ... depend[s] upon situation-specific factual inquiries.......
-
Jim Olive Photography v. Univ. of Hous. Sys.
...Agric. , 576 U.S. 350, 359, 135 S.Ct. 2419, 192 L.Ed.2d 388 (2015) ("physical appropriation"); Ark. Game & Fish Comm'n v. United States , 568 U.S. 23, 38, 133 S.Ct. 511, 184 L.Ed.2d 417 (2012) ("physical invasion"). Second, the government can regulate property so restrictively, or intrude o......
Get Started for Free
1 firm's commentaries
-
Federal Circuit Reaffirms Application of Categorical-Taking Analysis for Temporary Fifth Amendment Takings Claims in Rails-to-Trails Cases
...expectations regarding the land’s use” and 4) the “severity of the interference.” Arkansas Game & Fish Comm’n v. United States, 568 U.S. 23, 133 S. Ct. 511, 514, 184 L. Ed. 2d 417 James Hulme Laurel LaMontagne Morgan Pankow function JDS_LoadEvent(func) { var existingOnLoad = window.onlo......
23 books & journal articles
-
A-Table of Authorities
...Yuma, 7 Ariz. App. 53, 436 P.2d 147 (1968)................ 87, 113, 133, 173 Arkansas Game & Fish Comm’n v. United States, ___ U.S. ___, 133 S. Ct. 511, 184 L. Ed. 2d 417 (2012) 109 Armendariz v. Penman, 75 F.3d 1311 (9th Cir. 1996).................................................................
-
A River Used to Run Through It: Protecting the Public Right to a Sustainable Water System
...Renourishment, Inc. v. Fla. Dept. of Env’t Prot., 560 U.S. 702 (2010) (beach renourishment); Ark. Game & Fish Comm’n v. United States, 133 S. Ct. 511 (2012) (controlled flooding); Koontz v. St. Johns River Water Mgmt. Dist., 570 U.S. 595 (2013) (wetlands regulation); Murr v. Wisconsin, 137 ......
-
Rights, Structure, and Remediation: The Collapse of Constitutional Remedies.
...V. DAGHER 547 U.S. 1 No No UPPER SKAGIT INDIAN TRIBE V. LUNDGREN 138 S. Ct. 1649 No No ARKANSAS CAME AND FISH COMMISSION V. UNITED STATES 568 U.S. 23 Yes Yes CEDAR POINT NURSERY V. HASSID 141 S. Ct. 2063 Yes Yes HORNE V. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE 576 U.S. 351 Yes Yes KNICK V. TOWNSHIP OF SC......
-
PRIVATIZATION, PUBLIC COMMONS, AND THE TAKINGSIFICATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL LAW.
...may serve."). (521) Lingle v. Chevron U.S.A., Inc., 544 U.S. 528, 545 (2005). (522) Id. at 538, 542. (523) 137 S. Ct. 1933 (2017). (524) 568 U.S. 23 (525) Pa. Coal Co. v. Mahon, 260 U.S. 393, 415 (1922). (526) See, e.g., Hadacheck v. Sebastian, 239 U.S. 394 (1915). In Hadacheck, the Court a......
Get Started for Free