AR Game & Fish Comm'n v. United States

Docket Number11-597
Decision Date04 December 2012
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
218 cases
  • Nekrilov v. City of Jersey City
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of New Jersey
    • 24 Marzo 2021
    ...expectations are "the law in force in the State in which the property is located," Ark. Game & Fish Comm'n v. United States , 568 U.S. 23, 38, 133 S.Ct. 511, 184 L.Ed.2d 417 (2012) (citing Lucas , 505 U.S. at 1027–29, 112 S.Ct. 2886 ), as well as whether the government invited the activity ......
  • Surfrider Found. v. Martins Beach 1, LLC
    • United States
    • California Court of Appeals
    • 9 Agosto 2017
    ...with property" that are considered per se (or "categorical") takings. ( Arkansas Game & Fish Commission v. United States (2012) 568 U.S. 23, 31, 133 S.Ct. 511, 184 L.Ed.2d 417 ( Arkansas Game ); see also Lingle , supra , 544 U.S. at p. 538, 125 S.Ct. 2074 ; Powell v. County. of Humboldt (20......
  • Long v. State
    • United States
    • South Dakota Supreme Court
    • 21 Noviembre 2017
    ...interference with property is a taking." 2013 S.D. 13, ¶ 10, 827 N.W.2d at 61 (quoting Ark. Game & Fish Comm'n v. United States, 568 U.S. 23, 31, 133 S.Ct. 511, 518, 184 L.Ed.2d 417 (2012) ). "Instead, the viability of a takings claim ... depend[s] upon situation-specific factual inquiries.......
  • Jim Olive Photography v. Univ. of Hous. Sys.
    • United States
    • Texas Supreme Court
    • 18 Junio 2021
    ...Agric. , 576 U.S. 350, 359, 135 S.Ct. 2419, 192 L.Ed.2d 388 (2015) ("physical appropriation"); Ark. Game & Fish Comm'n v. United States , 568 U.S. 23, 38, 133 S.Ct. 511, 184 L.Ed.2d 417 (2012) ("physical invasion"). Second, the government can regulate property so restrictively, or intrude o......
  • Get Started for Free
1 firm's commentaries
23 books & journal articles
  • A-Table of Authorities
    • United States
    • Invalid date
    ...Yuma, 7 Ariz. App. 53, 436 P.2d 147 (1968)................ 87, 113, 133, 173 Arkansas Game & Fish Comm’n v. United States, ___ U.S. ___, 133 S. Ct. 511, 184 L. Ed. 2d 417 (2012) 109 Armendariz v. Penman, 75 F.3d 1311 (9th Cir. 1996).................................................................
  • A River Used to Run Through It: Protecting the Public Right to a Sustainable Water System
    • United States
    • Georgetown Environmental Law Review No. 34-1, July 2021
    • 1 Julio 2021
    ...Renourishment, Inc. v. Fla. Dept. of Env’t Prot., 560 U.S. 702 (2010) (beach renourishment); Ark. Game & Fish Comm’n v. United States, 133 S. Ct. 511 (2012) (controlled flooding); Koontz v. St. Johns River Water Mgmt. Dist., 570 U.S. 595 (2013) (wetlands regulation); Murr v. Wisconsin, 137 ......
  • Rights, Structure, and Remediation: The Collapse of Constitutional Remedies.
    • United States
    • Yale Law Journal Vol. 131 No. 7, May 2022
    • 1 Mayo 2022
    ...V. DAGHER 547 U.S. 1 No No UPPER SKAGIT INDIAN TRIBE V. LUNDGREN 138 S. Ct. 1649 No No ARKANSAS CAME AND FISH COMMISSION V. UNITED STATES 568 U.S. 23 Yes Yes CEDAR POINT NURSERY V. HASSID 141 S. Ct. 2063 Yes Yes HORNE V. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE 576 U.S. 351 Yes Yes KNICK V. TOWNSHIP OF SC......
  • PRIVATIZATION, PUBLIC COMMONS, AND THE TAKINGSIFICATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL LAW.
    • United States
    • University of Pennsylvania Law Review Vol. 171 No. 3, March 2023
    • 1 Marzo 2023
    ...may serve."). (521) Lingle v. Chevron U.S.A., Inc., 544 U.S. 528, 545 (2005). (522) Id. at 538, 542. (523) 137 S. Ct. 1933 (2017). (524) 568 U.S. 23 (525) Pa. Coal Co. v. Mahon, 260 U.S. 393, 415 (1922). (526) See, e.g., Hadacheck v. Sebastian, 239 U.S. 394 (1915). In Hadacheck, the Court a......
  • Get Started for Free