Archuleta v. Galetka
| Docket Number | 20070256 |
| Decision Date | 22 November 2011 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
124 cases
-
McCloud v. State
...Counsel investigated the facts of the case and developed a reasonable trial strategy based on that investigation. See Archuleta v. Galetka , 2011 UT 73, ¶ 140, 267 P.3d 232 ("So long as trial strategy decisions are based on thorough investigation of the law and the facts relevant to plausib......
-
McCloud v. State
...the result of the proceeding would have been different." State v. Wilder , 2018 UT 17, ¶ 17, 420 P.3d 1064 (quoting Archuleta v. Galetka , 2011 UT 73, ¶ 40, 267 P.3d 232 ).¶65 The Strickland court explained that the language of the Sixth Amendment "relies ... on the legal profession's maint......
-
State v. Bond
...standard of reasonable professional judgment and, second, that counsel's performance prejudiced the defendant.” Archuleta v. Galetka,2011 UT 73, ¶ 38, 267 P.3d 232.¶ 15 For plain error, Mr. Bond must demonstrate “(i) [a]n error exists; (ii) the error should have been obvious to the trial co......
-
McCloud v. State (State in Interest of C.Z.)
...the result of the proceeding would have been different." State v. Wilder, 2018 UT 17, ¶ 17, 420 P.3d 1064 (quoting Archuleta v. Galetka, 2011 UT 73, ¶ 40, 267 P.3d 232). ¶65 The Strickland court explained that the language of the Sixth Amendment "relies . . . on the legal profession's maint......
Get Started for Free