Archuleta v. State
| Docket Number | 20160992,20160419 |
| Decision Date | 20 August 2020 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
14 cases
-
Patterson v. State
...establish as a basis for the issuance of a post-conviction extraordinary writ. See UTAH CODE § 78B-9-104 ; see also Archuleta v. State , 2020 UT 62, ¶ 30, 472 P.3d 950 (concluding that a given claim was not provided for by the terms of the PCRA and thus holding that "the PCRA does not recog......
-
McCloud v. State
...purely factual findings for clear error, but [we] review the application of the law to the facts for correctness." Archuleta v. State , 2020 UT 62, ¶ 20, 472 P.3d 950 (alterations in original) (citation omitted).ANALYSIS¶35 McCloud argues that he was wrongly convicted of multiple felonies b......
-
McCloud v. State (State in Interest of C.Z.)
...purely factual findings for clear error, but [we] review the application of the law to the facts for correctness." Archuleta v. State, 2020 UT 62, ¶ 20, 472 P.3d 950 (alterations in original) (citation omitted).ANALYSIS ¶35 McCloud argues that he was wrongly convicted of multiple felonies b......
-
State v. Robinson
...would fail for the additional reason that rule 22(e) can be used only to challenge a sentence, not a conviction. See Archuleta v. State , 2020 UT 62, ¶ 36, 472 P.3d 950 ("Of course, [rule 22(e) ] applies only when a sentence, not a conviction, is being challenged.").8 On appeal, Robinson co......
Get Started for Free
