Argyle v. Johnson
Decision Date | 26 September 1911 |
Docket Number | 2244 |
Court | Utah Supreme Court |
Parties | ARGYLE et al. v. JOHNSON, County Treasurer |
APPEAL from District Court, Fourth District; Hon. J. E. Booth Judge.
Action by Benjamin Argyle and others against Mont Johnson, County Treasurer.
Judgment for plaintiffs. Defendant appeals.
AFFIRMED.
Jacob Evans and Elias Hanson for appellant.
A. B Morgan for respondents.
OPINION
This is an appeal from a final judgment perpetually enjoining the collection of a certain drainage tax.
It is not clear upon what ground the district judge based his decision. From what is disclosed by the record, however, it seems that the injunction was granted upon the ground that the law under which the tax was imposed is void, because it authorizes the taking of property without due process of law.
The judgment was granted upon the pleadings, and it is contended here that the judgment must be sustained, because the answer of appellant presented no defense. This contention is untenable, since both the denials, as well as the affirmative averments, contained in the answer presented issues of fact which could not have been determined on a motion for judgment on the pleadings; and if the law under which the tax was imposed is valid the judgment cannot stand. We shall therefore treat the motion for judgment as a demurrer to the answer, and by that method determine the validity of the law which is assailed.
The law in its present form was adopted in 1907, and constitutes sections 760 to 779, inclusive, of the Compiled Laws of Utah 1907. The text of the act in question, so far as material here, is as follows:
Section 764 in substance provides that the county commissioners shall canvass the votes cast at the election provided for in the preceding section, and if two-thirds of all the votes cast thereat shall be in favor of organizing a drainage district then the commissioners shall enter an order on their minutes declaring the district organized, and shall also declare the persons receiving the highest number of votes elected as trustees of such district; and the section further provides that "no action shall be commenced nor maintained, nor defense made, affecting the validity of the organization, unless commenced or made within one year after the entering of" the order declaring the district organized.
Section 265 provides that subsequent elections shall be held biennially; and section 266 is to the effect that the trustees shall hold office for two years, and also provides for their qualification by taking an oath and by giving official bonds.
Section 767 is as follows:
Sections 768 to 771 prescribe the duties of the officers, and provide for meetings of the board of trustees and the records to be kept by them.
"Sec. 772. Whenever the board of trustees deems it expedient it shall have power for the purpose of constructing drains, drainage canals and other required improvements, to issue bonds of the district to run not more than twenty years and to bear interest, pay semiannually at a rate not exceeding six per cent. per annum, to be called 'Drainage District Bonds,' and which bonds shall not be sold for less than their par value, and the proceeds of which shall be used for no other purpose than paying the cost of construction of such drain, drainage canal or other like work: Provided, that the aggregate amount of such bonds issued and outstanding may equal but never exceed in amount four per cent. of the value of the taxable property of any such district. The said board of trustees shall by resolution provide for the issuance and disposal of such bonds and for the payment of interest thereon the creation of a sinking fund for the ultimate redemption thereof and for the date and manner of the redemption of said bonds.
Sec. 773. Whenever any such drainage district bonds shall be issued in accordance with the provisions of this chapter, such bonds shall constitute a lien upon all of the lands and improvements thereon within the boundaries of the district, and the board of trustees of said district shall from time to time as hereinafter provided levy a sufficient tax to pay the annual interest charge on such bonds, and in addition thereto such an amount as a sinking fund, which shall, in the course of events and ultimately, amount to a sufficient sum to redeem said bonds.
Sec 774. The board of trustees shall on or before the first day of February of each year prepare a statement and estimate of the amount of money to be raised by taxation within said district for the purpose of constructing canals, drains, drain ditches and other works, and maintain the same; pay the interest upon the bonded indebtedness of the district; creating a sinking fund for redeeming such bonds; and for the purpose of maintaining and repairing drainage canals, flumes, conduits,...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Hemenway v. Craney
......561, 53 Am. St. 825, 23 S.E. 909, 31. L. R. A. 382; Hagar v. Reclamation Dist. No. 108,. 111 U.S. 701, 4 S.Ct. 663, 28 L.Ed. 569; Argyle v. Johnson, 39 Utah 500, 118 P. 487; Lower Kings River. Reclamation Dist. v. Phillips, 108 Cal. 306, 39 P. 630, 41 P. 335.). . . ......
-
McGrew v. Industrial Commission
...... the security of private rights.". . . After. quoting the above statement, in Argyle V. Johnson , 39 Utah 500, 118 P. 487, this court said. [page 490 ]:. . . . "In giving legal effect to the foregoing principle in. ......
-
Booth v. Groves
...and little, if any, citation of authorities. (Lower Kings River Reclamation Dist. v. Phillips, 108 Cal. 306, 41 P. 335; Argyle v. Johnson, 39 Utah 500, 118 P. 487; Hagar v. Reclamation Dist. No. 108, U.S. 701, 4 S.Ct. 663, 28 L.Ed. 569; Campbell v. Dwiggins, 83 Ind. 473; Black on Constituti......
-
Elkins v. Millard County Drainage Dist. No. 3
......Vol. 3. (4th Ed.) § 1119, p. 2264, § 1112, p. 2249, §. 1113, p. 2252; Kerr v. Woolley et al. , 3. Utah 456, 24 P. 831; Argyle v. Johnson , 39. Utah 500, 118 P. 487; State v. Corinne Drainage. District , 48 Utah 1, 156 P. 921; Londoner v. City & County of Denver , ......