Arizona Mutual Auto Ins. Co. v. Bernal
Decision Date | 13 January 1922 |
Docket Number | Civil 1912 |
Citation | 23 Ariz. 276,203 P. 338 |
Parties | ARIZONA MUTUAL AUTO INSURANCE COMPANY, a Corporation, Appellant, v. MARIANA BERNAL, an Infant, by JESUS BERNAL, Her Guardian Ad Litem, Appellee |
Court | Arizona Supreme Court |
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the County of Pima. Samuel L. Pattee, Judge. Affirmed.
Mr Richard E. Sloan, Mr. C. R. Holton, and Mr. Greig Scott, for Appellant.
Mr George O. Hilzinger and Mr. Edwin F. Jones, for Appellee.
The appellee, Mariana Bernal, suing by her guardian ad litem, having recovered a judgment against one Manuel Miranda for the sum of $3,000 and costs for injuries sustained by her because of the negligent operation of an automobile by Miranda, brought suit for the payment of said judgment against the appellant, Arizona Mutual Auto Insurance Company, basing her cause of action against the company on the terms of a certain policy of indemnity issued by it to Miranda, as the owner and user of said car in carrying passengers for hire. The court below rendered judgment in favor of appellee, and on this appeal, the question for determination is whether the admitted facts support the judgment.
By the policy so issued the company agreed to indemnify the assured Miranda "against loss by reason of the liability imposed by law upon the assured for damages on account of bodily injuries, including death resulting therefrom, accidentally suffered or alleged to have been suffered while this policy is in force by any person or persons not employed by the assured, or not at the time members of his family, by reason of the ownership, maintenance or use" of said automobile by Miranda while carrying passengers for hire; and also agreed to defend in the name and on behalf of the assured any suits, even if groundless, brought against the assured to recover damages on account of such happenings, and to pay by way of indemnification only not more than the sum of $5,000 "for loss from accident resulting in bodily injuries to, or in the death of, one person," such engagements on the part of the company being made, however, subject to the following conditions:
The policy was issued with an "endorsement" reading as follows:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Madouros v. Kansas City Coca-Cola Bottling Co.
... ... Wash. 543, 219 P. 12; Arizona Mutual Auto Ins. Co. v ... Bernal, 23 Ariz. 276, 203 P ... ...
-
Madouros v. K.C. Coca Cola Bot. Co.
...right-thinking persons. And such privity is found to be upheld in Finkelberg v. Continental Gas Co., 126 Wash. 543; Arizona Mutual Auto Ins. Co. v. Bernal, 23 Ariz. 276; Gugliemetta v. Graham, 50 Cal. App. 268; Stusser v. Mutual Union Ins. Co., 127 Wash. 444. See also as tending toward the ......
-
Allen v. Canal Ins. Co., Greenville, S. C.
...be relieved by the failure of the insured to cooperate. To so hold would defeat the very purpose of the act. Arizona Mutual Auto Insurance Co. v. Bernal, 23 Ariz. 276, 203 P. 338; Illinois Casualty Co. v. Krol, 324 Ill.App. 478, 58 N.E.2d 473; Roberts v. Central Mutual Insurance Company, 28......
-
Robertson v. The Board of County Commissioners of The County of Labette
... ... 543, 36 C. J. 1132; American ... Automobile Ins. Co. v. Struwe, 218 S.W. 534 [Tex. Civ ... App.]; Arizona Mut. Auto Ins. Co. v. Bernal, 23 ... Ariz. 276.) ... The ... ...