Arizona v. California, 8

Decision Date16 April 1984
Docket NumberNo. 8,8
Citation104 S.Ct. 1900,80 L.Ed.2d 194,466 U.S. 144
PartiesState of ARIZONA, Plaintiff, v. State of CALIFORNIA et al. Orig
CourtU.S. Supreme Court

A. Federal Establishments' Present Perfected Rights

The federal establishments named in Art. II, subdivision (D), paragraphs (2), (4) and (5) of the Decree entered March 9, 1964, in this case:

Defined nArea Annual Diversions Net Acres a1 Priority Date

of Land (Acre-Feet) a1

3) Fort Mojave Indian 27,969 4,327 Sept. 18, 1890

Reservation 75,566 11,691 Feb. 2, 1911 C. In addition to the mainstream diversion rights in favor of the Indian Reservations specified in Paragraph I(A) of the...

To continue reading

Request your trial
80 cases
  • Karuk Tribe of Northern California v. California Regional Water Quality Control Bd., North Coast Region
    • United States
    • California Court of Appeals
    • March 30, 2010
    ...[58 L.Ed.2d 627, 99 S.Ct. 995]; Arizona v. California (1983) 460 U.S. 605 [75 L.Ed.2d 318, 103 S.Ct. 1382]; Arizona v. California (1984) 466 U.S. 144 [80 L.Ed.2d 194, 104 S.Ct. 1900]; Arizona v. California (2000) 530 U.S. 392 [147 L.Ed.2d 374, 120 S.Ct. 2304]; Arizona v. California (2000) 5......
  • State ex rel. State Eng'r v. United States
    • United States
    • Court of Appeals of New Mexico
    • April 3, 2018
    ...See Arizona v. California , 439 U.S. 419, 422–23, 99 S.Ct. 995, 58 L.Ed.2d 627 (1979) (per curiam), amended , 466 U.S. 144, 104 S.Ct. 1900, 80 L.Ed.2d 194 (1984) ; Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians , 849 F.3d at 1270 ; Joint Bd. of Control of Flathead, Mission & Jocko Irrigation Dists.......
  • Legal Aid Society v. City of New York
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Southern District of New York
    • September 18, 2000
    ...1391, 75 L.Ed.2d 318, reh'g denied, 462 U.S. 1146, 103 S.Ct. 3131, 77 L.Ed.2d 1381 (1983), and decision supplemented, 466 U.S. 144, 104 S.Ct. 1900, 80 L.Ed.2d 194 (1984); see United States v. Yonkers Bd. of Educ., 856 F.2d 7, 11 (2d Cir.1988); Brown v. State, 250 A.D.2d 314, 320, 681 N.Y.S.......
  • Chemehuevi Indian Tribe v. United States
    • United States
    • Court of Federal Claims
    • September 29, 2020
    ...the supplemental orders entered by the Supreme Court in 1979 and 1984 . . . and, most recently, . . . in 2006." Id. (citing Arizona v. California, 466 U.S. 144 (1984); Arizona v. California, 439 U.S. 419 (1979) (per curiam); Arizona v. California, 547 U.S. 150, 157 (2006)). In the Tribe's v......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
  • Conflict comes to roost! The Bureau of Reclamation and the federal Indian trust responsibility.
    • United States
    • Environmental Law Vol. 31 No. 4, September 2001
    • September 22, 2001
    ...(203) Id. at 1178. (204) Id. (205) Arizona v. California, 373 U.S. 546, 595-98 (1962), amended by 383 U.S. 268 (1966), order amended by 466 U.S. 144 (206) Benson, supra note 83, at 413-15. (207) Id. at 369 (citing Memorandum from David Nawi & Lynn Peterson, Solicitors, Dep't of the Inte......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT