Arkansas Bank and Trust Company v. United States
Decision Date | 05 December 1963 |
Docket Number | No. 896.,896. |
Citation | 224 F. Supp. 171 |
Parties | ARKANSAS BANK AND TRUST COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant. |
Court | U.S. District Court — Western District of Arkansas |
Smith, Williams, Friday & Bowen, Little Rock, Ark., Wood, Chesnutt & Smith, Hot Springs, Ark., for plaintiff.
Robert L. Waters, Dept. of Justice, Stanley F. Krysa, Dept. of Justice, Fort Worth, Tex., for defendant.
This is an action by plaintiff-taxpayer, Arkansas Bank and Trust Company, to recover $960.66 paid under protest to the United States on January 4, 1962. In the plaintiff-taxpayer's 1959 corporate tax return it showed a net operating loss and applied for a tentative carry-back adjustment to the year 1956. The agents of the Commissioner of Internal Revenue examined the 1959 income tax return and application based upon the net operating loss deduction there reflected, and reduced the net operating loss reduction by disallowing $5,000 "rental expense" claimed by the taxpayer for the year 1959. This adjustment was accompanied by the increase in the allowed interest expense of $1,342.78 and a reduction of interest income of $455.03. The net adjustment had the effect of decreasing the 1959 loss by $3,202.19, which then caused a deficiency of $960.66 for the year 1956, to which the 1959 operating loss had been carried. The taxpayer paid the deficiency and timely filed its claim for refund which was denied.
The pertinent allegations in the plaintiff's complaint are set forth in paragraphs 3 through 7, as follows:
The defendant, United States, in its answer denied the Commissioner's determinations were erroneous, but otherwise admitted the allegations contained in plaintiff's complaint.
On October 23, 1963, the case was tried to the court at which time both parties introduced oral and documentary evidence. At the conclusion of the trial the case was submitted and taken under advisement by the court, subject to the submission of briefs by the parties in support of their contentions, which briefs have been received, and the cause is ready for disposition.
The pertinent facts as developed by the testimony at the trial and as admitted in the pleadings are not in dispute. The inferences to be drawn from them pose the major difficulty in the determination of the parties' contentions.
The President of the Arkansas Bank and Trust Company and principal stockholder is Cecil W. Cupp, formerly of Arkadelphia, Arkansas. In May 1959 Mr. Cupp acquired the stock of Mr. David Burgauer, who was President of Arkansas Trust Company. Mr. Cupp was President of the Citizens National Bank of Arkadelphia at the time he purchased the stock of Arkansas Trust Company. The Arkansas Trust Company in May 1959 had a capital structure of $400,000 and was located on Central Avenue in Hot Springs, Arkansas. The plaintiff, Arkansas Bank and Trust Company, is the successor of the Arkansas Trust Company. Its principal place of business is in Hot Springs, Arkansas, at the intersection of Malvern Avenue and Benton Street.
This property, owned in 1956 by Mrs. Afton Wootton and her son, Richard Wootton, is a tract of land containing 29,835 square feet, bounded by Malvern Avenue, Benton Street and Broadway. In March 1956 James W. Dowds, Sidney Nutt, and Q. Byron Hurst purchased the property from the Woottons for $125,000. At the time of the sale from the Woottons to Dowds, et al., Ray Smith, Sr., appraised the property for the Woottons at a value of $40,000 for the land and $85,000 for the improvements.
Dowds, et al., operated the property as a partnership under the name of "Broadway Square Building." On the partnership's 1956 tax return, the cost of the property was listed as $25,000 for the land and $100,000 for the improvements.
The improvements on the property at the time of the sale from the Woottons to Dowds, et al., consisted of the following:
After the purchase of the property by Dowds, et al., certain capital improvements and repairs were made. In 1957 a capital improvement of $10,000 was made in the Frederick Hotel to construct office space on the second floor. In 1956 repairs were made costing $1,331.62; in 1957 additional repairs were made costing $1,448.22; and in 1958 repairs were made costing $1,634.99. The "Broadway Square Building" partnership of Dowds, Nutt and Hurst received the following rents:
Gross Net 1956 $9,755.00 ( $2,058.87) 1957 11,225.73 ( 4,554.63) 1958 13,371.36 ( 2,729.15) 1959 14,493.61 ( 750.98)
On the 1959 partnership tax return of "Broadway Square Building" amounts received under the "lease" were reported as rent.
In May 1959 Dowds, on behalf of the partnership, offered to sell this property to Cecil W. Cupp, President of the Arkansas Bank and Trust Company for $150,000. Cupp advised Dowds that the bank could not purchase the property because of state and federal bank regulations, but that the bank might lease the property if approval of the federal banking authorities and the Comptroller of the Currency could be obtained. The property was in a submarginal area outside the established trade avenues of the City of Hot Springs. One block east of the property was the Rock Island depot and west and south of the property the Missouri Pacific depot.
Mr. Cupp, as President of the Arkansas Bank and Trust Company, had a difficult time obtaining authority from the Board of Directors to negotiate with Dowds for a lease of the property.
The "Agreement of Lease," which was negotiated at arms length, was executed by "Broadway Square Building" and "Arkansas Trust Company" on September 15, 1959. It contained the following major provisions:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
YELLOW CAB & CAR RENTAL CO. OF GULFPORT, MISS., INC. v. Commissioner
...Lockhart Leasing Company Dec. 29,962, 54 T.C. 301 (1970); Arkansas Bank and Trust Company v. United States 64-1 USTC ¶ 9113, 224 F. Supp. 171 (W.D. Ark. 1963). We have also held that when there is a written agreement in the form of a lease with option to purchase, this Court is not bound by......
-
Lockhart Leasing Co. v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue , Docket Nos. 2445-66 and 523-68.
...of Clarence B. Eaton, 10 T.C. 869, 881-882 (1948), and cf. Truman Bowen, 12 T.C. 446 (1949). See also Arkansas Bank & Trust Co. v. United States, 224 F.Supp. 171 (W.D. Ark. 1963), and Gem Incorporated v. United States, 192 F.Supp. 841 (N.D. Miss. 1961). We therefore hold that petitioner is ......
-
In re Fidelity American Mortg. Co.
...P-13, P-14, P-28 and P-29. 32 See notes 16 and 17 and accompanying text, supra. 33 See Exh. P-9. 34 Cf. Arkansas Bank and Trust Co. v. United States, 224 F.Supp. 171 (W.D.Ark.1963) (for federal income tax purposes, the determination of whether a lease is really a sale depends on numerous fa......
-
Davis v. Commissioner
...affd. 60-1 USTC ¶ 9211 273 F. 2d 738 (10th Cir. 1959), with Arkansas Bank and Trust Co.v. United States 64-1 USTC ¶ 9113, 224 F. Supp. 171 (W.D. Ark. 1963). Moreover, Latta's was required by the lease to pay Management the fair market value of any lost or damaged leased equipment without re......