Arkansas Public Service Commission v. United States, No. 197
| Court | United States Supreme Court |
| Writing for the Court | PER CURIAM; WHITTAKER |
| Citation | 2 L.Ed.2d 21,355 U.S. 4,78 S.Ct. 26 |
| Parties | ARKANSAS PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION, appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America and Interstate Commerce Commission et al |
| Decision Date | 14 October 1957 |
| Docket Number | No. 197 |
v.
UNITED STATES of America and Interstate Commerce Commission et al.
Supreme Court of the United States
Mr. Harry E. McDermott, Jr., for appellant.
Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Hansen, Messrs. Robert W. Ginnane and Samuel R. Howell, for the United States and Interstate Commerce Commission.
Messrs. Toll R. Ware, Clyde W. Fiddes and Pat Mehaffy, for appellees Missouri Pacific Railroad Co. and others.
PER CURIAM.
The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.
Mr. Justice WHITTAKER took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
To continue reading
Request your trial
99 practice notes
-
State v. Little
...the raison d'etre of the jury system." Pierce v. Albanese, 144 Conn. 241, 256, 129 A.2d 606, appeal dismissed, 355 U.S. 15, 78 S.Ct. 36, 2 L.Ed.2d 21 (1957); see also State v. Tatem, 194 Conn. 594, 483 A.2d 1087 (1984). It is within the province of the trier of fact to draw reasonable and l......
-
Griffin v. Eller, No. 62540-9
...may illuminate legislative intent. White v. State, 49 Wash.2d 716, 722-25, 306 P.2d 230, appeal dismissed, 355 U.S. 10, 78 S.Ct. 23, 2 L.Ed.2d 21 (1957). However, the majority does not undertake analysis of the successive amendments to the Act. The majority merely recites the Act was passed......
-
Hammer v. Mount Sinai Hosp., Nos. 8841
...facts rather than ultimate facts. See Pierce v. Albanese, 144 Conn. 241, 261, 129 A.2d 606, appeal dismissed, 355 U.S. 15, 78 S.Ct. 36, 2 L.Ed.2d 21 (1957). For example, one interrogatory asks, "Do you find from the evidence that the piercing was distal or beyond the vertebral artery?" Two ......
-
State v. Copas, (SC 15759)
...630, 641, 698 A.2d 258 (1997); accord Pierce v. Albanese, 144 Conn. 241, 256, 129 A.2d 606, appeal dismissed, 355 U.S. 15, 78 S. Ct. 36, 2 L. Ed. 2d 21 (1957). Thus, in determining whether the evidence supports a particular inference, we ask whether that inference is "so unreasonable as to ......
Request a trial to view additional results
99 cases
-
State v. Little
...the raison d'etre of the jury system." Pierce v. Albanese, 144 Conn. 241, 256, 129 A.2d 606, appeal dismissed, 355 U.S. 15, 78 S.Ct. 36, 2 L.Ed.2d 21 (1957); see also State v. Tatem, 194 Conn. 594, 483 A.2d 1087 (1984). It is within the province of the trier of fact to draw reasonable and l......
-
Griffin v. Eller, No. 62540-9
...may illuminate legislative intent. White v. State, 49 Wash.2d 716, 722-25, 306 P.2d 230, appeal dismissed, 355 U.S. 10, 78 S.Ct. 23, 2 L.Ed.2d 21 (1957). However, the majority does not undertake analysis of the successive amendments to the Act. The majority merely recites the Act was passed......
-
Hammer v. Mount Sinai Hosp., Nos. 8841
...facts rather than ultimate facts. See Pierce v. Albanese, 144 Conn. 241, 261, 129 A.2d 606, appeal dismissed, 355 U.S. 15, 78 S.Ct. 36, 2 L.Ed.2d 21 (1957). For example, one interrogatory asks, "Do you find from the evidence that the piercing was distal or beyond the vertebral artery?" Two ......
-
State v. Copas, (SC 15759)
...630, 641, 698 A.2d 258 (1997); accord Pierce v. Albanese, 144 Conn. 241, 256, 129 A.2d 606, appeal dismissed, 355 U.S. 15, 78 S. Ct. 36, 2 L. Ed. 2d 21 (1957). Thus, in determining whether the evidence supports a particular inference, we ask whether that inference is "so unreasonable as to ......
Request a trial to view additional results