Armco, Inc. v. U.S., 84-1715
Decision Date | 02 May 1985 |
Docket Number | No. 84-1715,84-1715 |
Citation | 760 F.2d 249 |
Parties | , 3 Fed. Cir. (T) 123 ARMCO INC., Bethlehem Steel Corp., Florida Wire & Cable Co., and Shinko Wire America, Inc., Appellants, v. The UNITED STATES of America, Appellee. Appeal |
Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Federal Circuit |
Appealed from U.S. Court of International Trade; Judge Maletz.
Terence P. Stewart, Stewart & Stewart, of Washington, D.C., argued for appellants. With him on the brief were Eugene L. Stewart, Paul W. Jameson and Mary E. Tuck.
Jack M. Simmons, III, Office of the Gen. Counsel, U.S. Intern. Trade Com'n, of Washington, D.C., argued for appellee U.S. With him on the brief was Michael P. Mabile, Acting Gen. Counsel.
Garry P. McCormack, Fox Glynn & Melamed, New York City, argued for intervenor Tecnor. With him on the brief were Raymond F. Stechel and John R. Haran.
Before MARKEY, Chief Judge, DAVIS, Circuit Judge, and SKELTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Appeal from a judgment of the United States Court of International Trade, 590 F.Supp. 1273 (Ct.Int'l Trade 1984), that substantial evidence supported the United States International Trade Commission's negative injury determinations with respect to imports of prestressed concrete steel wire strand from Spain, France, the United Kingdom, and Brazil.
The judgment appealed from is affirmed on the basis of the opinion filed by Senior Judge Maletz.
AFFIRMED.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Metallverken Nederland BV v. US
...(1984); American Spring Wire Corp. v. United States, 8 CIT 20, 26, 590 F.Supp. 1273, 1279 (1984), aff'd sub nom. Armco Inc. v. United States, 760 F.2d 249 (Fed. Cir.1985). The Commissioners have the discretion to determine the weight to be given factors they consider. Copperweld Corp. v. Un......
-
Citrosuco Paulista, SA v. US
...American Spring Wire Corp. v. United States, 8 CIT 20, 22, 590 F.Supp. 1273, 1276 (1984), aff'd sub nom. Armco, Inc. v. United States, 3 Fed.Cir. (T) 123, 760 F.2d 249 (1985). The Court cannot state that the Commissioners acted unreasonably in not deducting inventories that Citrosuco claims......
-
National Knitwear & Sportswear Ass'n v. US
...American Spring Wire Corp. v. United States, 8 CIT 20, 22, 590 F.Supp. 1273, 1276 (1984), aff'd sub nom. Armco, Inc. v. United States, 3 Fed.Cir. (T) 123, 760 F.2d 249 (1985) (quoting Universal Camera, 340 U.S. at 488, 71 S.Ct. at 464). In determining whether to sustain the agency's constru......
-
JMC Steel Grp. v. United States
...F.Supp. 1273, 1277 (1984) (“ ‘No factor, standing alone, triggers a per se rule of material injury.’ ”) (citation omitted), aff'd 760 F.2d 249 (Fed.Cir.1985). The Commission fulfilled this obligation in its analysis when it examined the facts specific to the domestic CWP industry during the......