Armour v. State

CourtGeorgia Court of Appeals
Writing for the CourtSOGNIER; DEEN, C. J., and BIRDSONG
CitationArmour v. State, 270 S.E.2d 22, 154 Ga.App. 740 (Ga. App. 1980)
Decision Date02 July 1980
Docket NumberNo. 59360,59360
PartiesARMOUR v. The STATE.

Charles W. Smith, Jr., Gainesville, for appellant.

Jeff C. Wayne, Dist. Atty., Thomas Myron Cole, Asst. Dist. Atty., for appellee.

SOGNIER, Judge.

Armour was convicted in the Superior Court of Hall County of burglary of the post office in Murrayville, Georgia. On appeal, he enumerates six errors; however, defense counsel did not object or take exception at trial to the first three errors enumerated, and it is well settled that this court will not consider any issues raised for the first time on appeal. Sanders v. State, 134 Ga.App. 825, 216 S.E.2d 371 (1975). Thus, we will confine our opinion to the last three enumerations of error, which challenge the conviction on the so-called "general" grounds.

Evidence presented at trial would authorize the jury to find that on the night of December 31, 1978 Armour and Jimmie Nell Woody broke into the Murrayville post office by forcing a locked door open with a crowbar. They took some letters, an adding machine, coins and three rolls of 15 cent stamps. Subsequently, Armour opened the envelopes, removed any checks and burned the remaining contents and envelopes. He took the checks and gave them to two different young ladies who went into various commercial establishments and a bank and cashed the checks. The young ladies forged the name of the payee when they endorsed the checks; they would then give the money to Armour, who would give a portion of such money to the young ladies and keep the remainder himself. Woody took the adding machine to her mother's house, where it was found by law enforcement officials; two of the three rolls of stamps were found in Woody's cigarette...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
28 cases
  • Bragg v. State
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • July 9, 1985
    ...as true; the jury determines the credibility of the witnesses and weight to be given their testimony. OCGA § 24-9-80; Armour v. State, 154 Ga.App. 740, 270 S.E.2d 22 (1980). On the basis of the evidence presented, a rational trier of fact could have found appellant guilty beyond a reasonabl......
  • Painter v. State
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • September 10, 1981
    ...Painter's conviction. The weight of the evidence and credibility of witnesses are for the jury's determination. Armour v. State, 154 Ga.App. 740, 270 S.E.2d 22 (1980). This court passes on the sufficiency of the evidence, not its weight, id., and we find that a rational trier of fact could ......
  • Hopkins v. State
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • September 8, 1983
    ...of witnesses are matters to be determined by the jury." Turner v. State, supra 151 Ga.App. at 170, 259 S.E.2d 171; Armour v. State, 154 Ga.App. 740, 270 S.E.2d 22 (1980). "To warrant a conviction on circumstantial evidence, the proved facts shall not only be consistent with the hypothesis o......
  • Rosequist v. Pratt
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • September 3, 1991
    ... ... It is also the jury which assesses the credibility of witnesses and the weight to be assigned to the evidence. Young v. State, 232 Ga. 176 (205 SE2d 307) (1974); Armour v. State, 154 Ga.App. 740 (270 SE2d 22) ... (1980); Causey v. State, 154 Ga.App. 76 (267 SE2d 475) ... ...
  • Get Started for Free