Armstead v. Union Trust Co. of the District of Columbia, 5767.
Decision Date | 31 October 1932 |
Docket Number | No. 5767.,5767. |
Citation | 61 F.2d 677,61 App. DC 269 |
Parties | ARMSTEAD et al. v. UNION TRUST CO. OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al. |
Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — District of Columbia Circuit |
John U. Gardiner, of Washington, D. C., for appellants.
B. S. Minor, H. P. Gatley, A. P. Drury, G. E. Hamilton, J. J. Hamilton, G. E. Hamilton, Jr., H. R. Gower, and W. H. Holloway, all of Washington, D. C., for appellees.
Before MARTIN, Chief Justice, and ROBB, HITZ, and GRONER, Associate Justices.
Appeal from a decree in the Supreme Court of the District construing the will of Albert Sewell Kenny.
Item 2 of the will directs the payment of debts and funeral expenses.
By items 3 and 7 certain specific devises and bequests are made.
Items 4, 5, and 6 bequeath pecuniary legacies as follows: To Hester Armstead, $1,000; to Emma Jackson Belt, $500; to Annie T. Smith, $500; and to Mary A. McCollom, $2,500.
Item nine reads:
The testator's death occurred in 1930. By the time the executor was ready to file its final account in April, 1932, the stock directed to be sold under item 9 had so depreciated in value that there were not sufficient funds to pay all the debts, funeral expenses, taxes, executor's fee, and the pecuniary bequests in items 4, 5, and 6. Thereupon the executor filed the petition herein, seeking instruction as to whether the pecuniary legacies set out in items 4, 5, and 6 are general legacies and must abate and bear the whole burden of the deficiency in assets, or whether such legacies are demonstrative and, together with the specific legacies, abate pro rata.
The court below found and decreed that the legacies bequeathed by items 4, 5, and 6 are general and are not by item 9 converted into...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Wyman v. Roesner, 80-472.
...estate once the primary source has been exhausted. Kenaday, supra, 179 U.S. at 618-20, 21 S.Ct. at 237-38; Armstead v. Union Trust Co., 61 App.D.C. 269, 270, 61 F.2d 677, 678 (1932); Lansburgh, supra at 206, 37 F.2d at 1002; Plant, supra at 165; Douglass, supra at 26-27. See generally 6 W. ......
-
In re Estate of Jeffcott, 5821.
...fund created was a general fund for general purposes, not a specific fund for specific purposes. See Armstead v. Union Trust Co. of District of Columbia, 61 App.D.C. 269, 61 F.2d 677 (1932). The Court in Armstead held that general pecuniary legacies (items 4, 5 and 6 of the will) were not c......
-
Maguire v. Stirling
...and the cause remanded for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. So ordered. 1 Cf. Armstead v. Union Trust Co. of the District of Columbia, 61 App.D.C. 269, 61 F.2d 677 (1932); 6 Page on Wills 7 et seq. (Bowe-Parker 2 If the legacy had not been so fixed in amount, it would appea......