Armstrong Cork Co. v. H.A. Meldrum Co.

Decision Date04 December 1922
Citation285 F. 58
PartiesARMSTRONG CORK CO. v. H. A. MELDRUM CO.
CourtU.S. District Court — Western District of New York

Kenefick Cooke, Mitchell & Bass, of Buffalo, N.Y., for receivers.

John Lord O'Brian, of Buffalo, N.Y., for University of Buffalo.

George W. Wanamaker, of Buffalo, N.Y., for Canisius College.

HAZEL District Judge.

On return of the show cause herein and request for instructions by the receivers, it was stated ore tenus that, since there was no objection from creditors or stockholders, the receivers were authorized to pay proportionately out of the funds in their custody the two subscriptions of the president and directors of the insolvent company, made by them in October, 1919, while the company was believed solvent, to the endowment fund of the University of Buffalo and to the endowment fund of Canisius College, and the views here submitted are supplementary.

It appears by affidavit that the subscriptions were made with the sanction and approval of three out of five directors of the company, after full discussion as to the possible benefits to be derived by the corporation from their action. The directors authorizing the subscriptions were the managers of the business, and they had been such for a long time. It was regarded by them as a proper incidental business expenditure, and no objection has ever been made by the nonattending directors or stockholders.

It appears, also, that at the time the subscriptions were made it was considered that no collegiate institute in Buffalo presented opportunity for education in the science of business, and as the company had many employees of various classes it would in all probability inure to the future advantage of the company to be able to secure employees trained and skilled in corporate business and industrial affairs, especially involving knowledge of financial accounting, management, and administration of the business in its various departments, bookkeeping, salesmanship advertising according to modern methods, etc. The donees contemplated and already have engaged competent teachers at large expense to instruct students in these branches of education, in reliance upon the payment of the donations of the defendant and other subscribers to the endowment funds. It was also considered, in making the subscriptions or donations, that the company would receive advertisement of substantial value, including the good will of many influential...

To continue reading

Request your trial
5 cases
  • State ex inf. Gentry v. Long-Bell Lumber Co.
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • December 7, 1928
    ... ... Steinway v. Steinway & Son, ... 40 N.Y.S. 718; Armstrong Cork Co. v. H. A. Maldrum ... Co., 285 F. 58. (b) The right that ... ...
  • A. P. Smith Mfg. Co. v. Barlow
    • United States
    • New Jersey Supreme Court
    • June 25, 1953
    ...was not considered by the court to be so remote as to bring it outside the common-law rule. Similarly, in Armstrong Cork Co. v. H. A. Meldrum Co., 285 F. 58 (D.C.W.D.N.Y.1922), the court sustained contributions made by the corporation to the University of Buffalo and Canisius College. In th......
  • Herald Company v. Seawell, 691-70
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Tenth Circuit
    • December 29, 1972
    ...289, 55 S.Ct. 158, 79 L.Ed. 367 (1934); American Rolling Mill Co. v. Commissioner, 41 F.2d 314 (6th Cir. 1930); Armstrong Cork Co. v. H. A. Meldrum Co., 285 F. 58 (W.D.N.Y.1922); Miami v. Florida Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 208 So.2d 249 (Fla.1968); United Transit Co. v. Nunes, 99 R.I. 501, 209 A.2d......
  • Martin Orchard Co. v. Fruit Growers' Canning Co.
    • United States
    • Wisconsin Supreme Court
    • December 9, 1930
    ...(C. C. A.) 237 F. 942, the power of a corporation to provide pensions for employees was sustained. In the case of Armstrong Cork Co. v. H. A. Meldrum Co. (D. C.) 285 F. 58, 59, the power of a corporation to contribute to endowment of colleges was sustained, where it appeared that the school......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
  • Why We Should Keep Teaching Dodge v. Ford Motor Co.
    • United States
    • The Journal of Corporation Law Vol. 48 No. 1, September 2022
    • September 22, 2022
    ...instruments was not ultra vires). (151.) 120 N.Y.S. 649 (App. Div. 1909). (152.) Id. at 651. (153.) Armstrong Cork Co. v. H.A. Mendrum Co., 285 F. 58, 59 (W.D.N.Y. (154.) Id. at 58-59. (155.) Id. (156.) Id. at 59. (157.) Id. An interesting wrinkle to the case is the court's observation that......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT