Armstrong v. Adams

Decision Date26 January 1875
Citation31 Mich. 236
CourtMichigan Supreme Court
PartiesJames W. Armstrong v. Benjamin K. Adams and another

Heard January 22, 1875

Case made from Newaygo Circuit.

Judgment set aside, and another trial ordered, without costs by either party against the other.

J. A. Fairfield, W. L. Stoughton and L. D. Norris, for plaintiff.

Thompson, Reeves & Pratt and D. Darwin Hughes, for defendants.

Graves, Ch. J. Cooley, and Campbell, JJ., concurred. Christiancy, J., did not sit in this case.

OPINION

Graves, Ch. J.:

This case was submitted with that brought by these defendants against Champion and Huckett, and on the argument made in that case. The actions agree in form, and concern the same property. This suit was commenced by Armstrong against Adams and Knight, immediately after the latter got possession under their replevin against Champion and Huckett, and the property was taken out of their hands by his writ and delivered to him. As in the other case, the issue was heard by the court without a jury, and judgment was given for Armstrong. The record is not as objectionable as that in the other case. But the same miscarriage in regard to findings is apparent, and some additional incongruities are introduced. Several questions, with the judge's answers made in the other case, are transferred to this without regard to their fitness, and the record, taken as a whole, is misshaped, irregular and imperfect.

We have no right to attempt a revision of such proceedings, and we should incur the risk of doing mischief, if we were to assume to engage in the attempt.

Treating the case as a mistrial, as an abortive proceeding, we can only remit the parties to their position before the trial.

The judgment must be set aside, and another trial ordered, but without costs by either party against the other.

Cooley, and Campbell, JJ., concurred.

Christiancy, J., did not sit in this case.

To continue reading

Request your trial
2 cases
  • Railway Company v. Johnson
    • United States
    • Arkansas Supreme Court
    • May 5, 1894
    ...538. Treating plaintiff as a passenger, he knew of all the surroundings, and attending circumstances, and was not entitled to recover. 31 Mich. 236. 2. proof shows him guilty of contributory negligence. 95 U.S. 697; 48 Ark. 106; 46 id. 528; 54 id. 25; ib. 431; 37 Am. & Eng. R. R. Cases, 172......
  • Adams v. Champion
    • United States
    • Michigan Supreme Court
    • January 26, 1875

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT