Armstrong v. Bergeron
| Decision Date | 06 March 1962 |
| Parties | Albert ARMSTRONG v. Kenneth W. BERGERON. Edith R. ARMSTRONG v. Kenneth W. BERGERON. |
| Court | New Hampshire Supreme Court |
Howard B. Lane, Keene, for plaintiffs.
Devine, Millimet & McDonough and Bartram C. Branch, Manchester, for defendant.
The issue to be decided is whether the defendant is liable for the aggravation by the negligence of another motorist of an injury which the defendant previously caused the plaintiff Edith Armstrong.
November 12, 1958 Edith's car, while stopped on Main Street in Keene, was struck in the rear by defendant's automobile. She received what was referred to as a 'whiplash' injury to her neck and head. Cf. Pike v. Scribner, 103 N.H. 203, 204-205, 168 A.2d 114.
August 5, 1959 while stopped at a railroad crossing on the same street her car was hit in the rear by a motor vehicle operated by one Bill. This produced an aggravation of the neck and head injury received in the previous accident with the defendant.
The Trial Court in its charge to the jury on the damages which could be recovered against the defendant gave the following instructions: 'If you find as a consequence of the accident with Mr. Bergeron the plaintiff, Mrs. Armstrong, received injuries which increased her susceptibility to further similar injuries, and that this susceptibility existed on August 8, 1959 and that actually and in fact her condition was aggravated by the subsequent accident of August 8, 1959, then you may consider the extent of this aggravation in arriving at a figure fairly to include this aggravation.'
As a general rule if a second injury or an aggravation of a prior one is considered to be a direct consequence or a natural result of the original injury, the original wrongdoer is held liable for the entire damage. Tuttle v. Dodge, 80 N.H. 304, 311, 116 A. 627; Atherton v. Rowe, 89 N.H. 196, 198, 195 A. 676. Thus the original tortfeasor has been held liable for an aggravation of the original injury caused by the medical, surgical or hospital services rendered to the plaintiff on account of that injury. Tuttle v. Farmington, 58 N.H. 13, 14; Demers v. Flack, 88 N.H. 184, 186, 185 A. 896. Restatement, Torts, s. 457. Such recovery has been allowed also for a subsequent injury caused by a fall while the victim was using crutches necessitated by the original injury. Tuttle v. Dodge, supra; Annots. 9 A.L.R. 255; 20 A.L.R. 524.
On the contrary if a second injury or an aggravation of a previous injury is attributable to a distinct intervening cause without which it would not have happened, the wrongdoer is...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Hashimoto v. Marathon Pipe Line Co., s. 87-120
...Acc. & Indem. Co., 204 So.2d 49, 51 (La.App.1967); Watkins v. Hand, 198 Neb. 451, 253 N.W.2d 287, 289 (1977); Armstrong v. Bergeron, 104 N.H. 85, 178 A.2d 293, 294 (1962); Williams v. Gragston, 7 Ohio App.3d 369, 455 N.E.2d 1075 (1982); and 22 Am.Jur.2d Damages § 115 (1988). See also G. Dou......
-
Wallach v. Allstate Ins. Co.
...v. Marathon Pipe Line Co., 767 P.2d 158, 160-61 (Wyo.1989); Bruckman v. Pena, 29 Colo.App. 357, 487 P.2d 566 (1971); Armstrong v. Bergeron, 104 N.H. 85, 178 A.2d 293 (1962) (all so The final issue is whether the erroneous instruction substantially affected Allstate's rights. See ORS 19.415(......
-
Mooney v. United States
...or a natural result of the original injury, the original wrongdoer is held liable for the entire damage. Armstrong v. Bergeron, 104 N.H. 85, 86, 178 A.2d 293 (1962). His most serious injury was an intero-chanteric fracture of his right hip. Plaintiff was hospitalized on two separate occasio......
-
Barkley v. Freeman, 66461
...intervening cause. Without direct Kansas holdings, we look to similar fact situations decided by other states. In Armstrong v. Bergeron, 104 N.H. 85, 178 A.2d 293 (1962), the court found the subsequent accident "intervened to break the chain of causation between the original injury resultin......