Armstrong v. City of Montgomery
Decision Date | 17 February 1949 |
Docket Number | 3 Div. 509. |
Parties | ARMSTRONG et al. v. CITY OF MONTGOMERY. |
Court | Alabama Supreme Court |
Robt. E. Coburn, Jr., of Montgomery, for appellants.
R S. Hill, Jr. and Walter J. Knabe, both of Montgomery, for appellee.
Appeal in this case is from a declaratory decree rendered by the circuit court, in equity, upholding the constitutionality of § 595, Title 62, Code of 1940, relating to the Cities of Mobile and Montgomery. Subsection (2) thereof provides 'Each such city shall have the same power with reference to the construction or reconstruction of sanitary sewer systems and sewage treatment or disposal plants and the construction or reconstruction of outlets for such sewer systems within the police jurisdiction of such city as it has within the corporate limits of such city.'
Subsection (3), § 595, Tit. 62, Code of 1940 provides:
To fully understand the scope and purpose of said section it must be read in connection with § 601, Title 37, Code of 1940, which provides: 'All cities and towns may make all needful provisions for the drainage of such city or town; may construct and maintain efficient sanitary and storm-water sewers, or sewer systems, either within or without the corporate limits of the city or town; may construct and maintain ditches, surface drains, aqueducts, and canals build and construct underground sewers through private or public property, either within or without the corporate limits of such city or town, but just compensation must first be made for the private property taken, injured, or destroyed.'
Section 513, Title 37, Code of 1940, dealing generally with powers conferred by the legislature on municipalities in subsection 2 provides: 'The construction...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Mayor of Ocean Springs v. Homebldrs. Ass'n
...must be expressly conferred by statute and when so conferred include necessary incidental powers." Armstrong v. City of Montgomery, 251 Ala. 632, 38 So.2d 862, 863 (1949). ¶ 53. The Iowa and Alabama decisions comport with holdings of our federal courts interpreting Mississippi law in a seri......
-
Opinion of the Justices, In re, 155
...in which they were asked, as follows: (1) a. No. b. No. c. No. d. No. These answers are based on the holding in Armstrong v. City of Montgomery, 251 Ala. 632, 38 So.2d 862. (2) No. Schultes v. Eberly, 82 Ala. 242, 2 So. 345; Bradley v. State ex rel. Rockwell, 210 Ala. 166, 97 So. 543; Colli......
-
Water Works and Sanitary Sewer Bd. of Montgomery v. Sullivan, 3 Div. 664
...power to make such assessment is a taxing power of the legislature conferred on the city by legislative enactment. Armstrong v. City of Montgomery, 251 Ala. 632, 38 So.2d 862; Sections 308, 601 to 646, Title 37, But since the assessment of the cost to property specially benefited is an exer......
-
Oliver v. Water Works and Sanitary Sewer Bd.
...in the nature of a tax and it was a special use of the taxing power of the city by legislative enactment, citing Armstrong v. City of Montgomery, 251 Ala. 632, 38 So.2d 862; sections 308, 601 to 646, Title 37, Code. We therefore referred to our case of Mitchell v. City of Mobile, 244 Ala. 4......