Arndt v. Hannum Trucking, s. 13389

Decision Date22 October 1981
Docket Number13390,Nos. 13389,13394 and 13395,s. 13389
Citation324 N.W.2d 680
PartiesEd ARNDT, as Special Administrator of the Estate of Ervin L. Peterson, Jr., deceased, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. HANNUM TRUCKING and Duane Hannum, Individually, Defendant, Third-Party Plaintiff and Appellant, v. C. E. McKINLEY, d/b/a McKinley Agency, The City of Fort Pierre, South Dakota, a Municipal Corporation, the South Dakota Department of Transportation, a Sub-division of the Government of the State of South Dakota, Third-Party Defendants, and Maynard Sommer, individually and as the Highway Engineer for the South Dakota Department of Transportation, State of South Dakota, and Henry Greek, individually and as District Engineer for the Fourth District of the South Dakota Department of Transportation, Third-Party Defendants and Appellees. . Considered on Briefs
CourtSouth Dakota Supreme Court

Thomas M. Maher of Maher & Gors, Pierre, for plaintiff and appellant.

James Robbennolt of Duncan, Olinger, Srstka, Lovald & Robbennolt, Pierre, for defendant, third-party plaintiff and appellant.

Charles P. Schroyer of Schmidt, Schroyer, Colwill & Zinter, Pierre, for third-party defendants and appellees.

PER CURIAM.

These are appeals from two judgments granting appellees' motions for summary judgments. We affirm.

On February 27, 1979, Ervin Peterson died when the antenna on the vehicle he was operating touched an overhead electrical line crossing Highway 14-83 near Fort Pierre. In the resulting negligence and workmen's compensation actions, it was alleged that appellees, Maynard Sommer, the state highway engineer, and Henry Greek, the District 4 engineer, were negligent while acting in their official capacities. Summary judgments were granted on the basis of sovereign immunity.

At the time of the accident, appellees were covered by two liability insurance policies purchased by the State and the Department of Transportation. Appellants argue that the approval of the general appropriations bill which included line item authorization for the payment of certain liability insurance policy premiums, see SDCL 4-7, 4-8, waived the sovereign immunity attaching to appellees in their roles as state employees.

We disagree. In High-Grade Oil Co., Inc. v. Sommer, 295 N.W.2d 736, (S.D.1980), we considered whether the purchase of liability insurance waived the immunity of state employees and officers. We said:

Finally, we look to appellants' most persuasive argument, that the purchase of liability insurance constitutes a waiver of immunity, particularly as to officers and employees of the state. The record reflects that there are two policies of liability insurance, each with substantial coverage; one apparently purchased by the State Purchasing Department and the other apparently purchased by the State Bureau of Administration. On its face it would appear that if the legislature authorized purchase of such coverage the state would not intend to spend tax dollars for something that it does not need if there is in law no liability, so its obvious intent would be to waive immunity. Yet appellants fail to cite to us and we are unable to find any statutory authority for those departments or agencies to purchase those policies.

* * *

Nor do we believe that either the State Purchasing Department or the Bureau of Administration has constitutional or statutory...

To continue reading

Request your trial
6 cases
  • Gasper v. Freidel
    • United States
    • South Dakota Supreme Court
    • 19 Octubre 1989
    ...liability insurance. All the defendants contend that it would be improper to retroactively apply these statutes. In Arndt v. Hannum Trucking, 324 N.W.2d 680 (S.D.1982), we made clear that "statutes are presumed to have prospective application and may be construed as retroactive only when su......
  • National Bank of South Dakota v. Leir, 13561
    • United States
    • South Dakota Supreme Court
    • 3 Noviembre 1982
    ...were sued only in their capacity as representatives of the school district, they were immune from suit.Similarly, in Arndt v. Hannum Trucking, 324 N.W.2d 680 (S.D.1982), administrator of deceased's estate brought an action against Sommer and Greek in their official capacities as Highway Eng......
  • Kruger v. Wilson
    • United States
    • South Dakota Supreme Court
    • 3 Noviembre 1982
    ...in his representative or official capacity only, which does not allege personal negligence, is barred by immunity. See Arndt v. Hannum Trucking, 324 N.W.2d 680 (S.D.1982) (decided 10-6-82); Merrill v. Birhanzel, 310 N.W.2d 522, 523 n. 1 (S.D.1981); Spielman v. State, 91 N.W.2d 627 (N.D.1958......
  • Ernst & Young v. REVENUE & REGULATION, 23100.
    • United States
    • South Dakota Supreme Court
    • 10 Noviembre 2004
    ...as retroactive only when such intention plainly appears." Gasper v. Freidel, 450 N.W.2d 226, 233 (S.D.1990) (citing Arndt v. Hannum Trucking, 324 N.W.2d 680 (S.D.1982)). Therefore, since the intent of the legislature was that SDCL 10-59-19 apply to the case at bar, further analysis of how S......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT