Arnett v. Kennedy 8212 1118, No. 72
| Court | United States Supreme Court |
| Writing for the Court | REHNQUIST; REHNQUIST; POWELL; WHITE; DOUGLAS; MARSHALL; In the Roth and Sindermann cases |
| Citation | 94 S.Ct. 1633,416 U.S. 134,40 L.Ed.2d 15 |
| Decision Date | 16 April 1974 |
| Docket Number | No. 72 |
| Parties | Alvin J. ARNETT, Director, Office of Economic Opportunity, et al., Appellants, v. Wayne KENNEDY, etc., et al. —1118 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
1653 practice notes
-
Thornton v. Barnes, No. 88-2464
...grace, but by constitutional guarantee.' " Cleveland Bd. of Educ., 470 U.S. at 541, 105 S.Ct. at 1492 (quoting Arnett v. Kennedy, 416 U.S. 134, 167, 94 S.Ct. 1633, 1650, 40 L.Ed.2d 15 (1974) (Powell, J., concurring in part and concurring in result in part)). Therefore, once a person has est......
-
Fowler v. Board of Educ. of Lincoln County, Ky., Nos. 85-5815
...in drawing statutes which are broad enough to cover a wide range of conduct, yet narrow enough to give fair warning. In Arnett v. Kennedy, 416 U.S. 134, 94 S.Ct. 1633, 40 L.Ed.2d 15 (1974), the Court concluded that the term "such cause as will promote the efficiency of the service" was not ......
-
Yul Chu v. Miss. State Univ., Civil Action No. 1:08–CV–00232–GHD–DAS.
...point out that a tenured appointment, providing for entitlement to a job, absent cause, would be a far different case.Arnett v. Kennedy, 416 U.S. 134, 184–85, 94 S.Ct. 1633, 40 L.Ed.2d 15 (1974) (internal citation omitted). The Fifth Circuit has stated: Mississippi law is clear that neither......
-
Sanders By Sanders v. Marquette Public Schools, No. M81-153 CA2.
...of the motion as well as all pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions properly on file. Arnett v. Kennedy, 416 U.S. 134, 94 S.Ct. 1633, 40 L.Ed.2d 15 (1974); Smith v. Hudson, 600 F.2d 60 (6th I. STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS Neither 20 U.S.C. § 1401, the Education for All......
Request a trial to view additional results
1617 cases
-
Yul Chu v. Miss. State Univ., Civil Action No. 1:08–CV–00232–GHD–DAS.
...point out that a tenured appointment, providing for entitlement to a job, absent cause, would be a far different case.Arnett v. Kennedy, 416 U.S. 134, 184–85, 94 S.Ct. 1633, 40 L.Ed.2d 15 (1974) (internal citation omitted). The Fifth Circuit has stated: Mississippi law is clear that neither......
-
Sanders By Sanders v. Marquette Public Schools, No. M81-153 CA2.
...of the motion as well as all pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions properly on file. Arnett v. Kennedy, 416 U.S. 134, 94 S.Ct. 1633, 40 L.Ed.2d 15 (1974); Smith v. Hudson, 600 F.2d 60 (6th I. STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS Neither 20 U.S.C. § 1401, the Education for All......
-
Love v. City of Monterey, No. H012606
...42 L.Ed.2d 725]; Mitchell v. W.T. Grant Co. (1974) 416 U.S. 600, 611-612 [94 S.Ct. 1895, 1902, 40 L.Ed.2d 406]; Arnett v. Kennedy [1974] 416 U.S. 134, 164 [94 S.Ct. 1633, 1649, 40 L.Ed.2d 15] (concurring opn., Justice Powell), p. 178, 94 S.Ct. at p. 1656 (concurring and dissenting opn., Jus......
-
Bettio v. Village of Northfield, No. 91-CV-1383.
...him; 2) an explanation of the employer's evidence; and 3) an opportunity to present his side of the story. Id., citing Arnett v. Kennedy, 416 U.S. 134, 170-71, 94 S.Ct. 1633, 1652, 40 L.Ed.2d 15 (1974) (Powell, J., The Sixth Circuit has held that the third factor of the Loudermill test is t......
Request a trial to view additional results
4 books & journal articles
-
STARE DECISIS AND INTERSYSTEMIC ADJUDICATION.
...the plurality's reasoning); Sexton v. Kennedy, 523 F.2d 1311, 1314 (6th Cir. 1975) (treating the plurality opinion from Arnett v. Kennedy, 416 U.S. 134 (1974), as (54) 406 U.S. 682 (1972). (55) Id. at 684 (plurality opinion). (56) Id. (57) Id. (58) Id. at 684-85. (59) Id. at 685. (60) Id. a......
-
The Geography of Abortion Rights
...of] such an interest . . . without [due process].’” (second, third, and fourth alterations in original) (quoting Arnett v. Kennedy, 416 U.S. 134, 167 (1974) (Powell, J., concurring in part))); 1134 THE GEORGETOWN LAW JOURNAL [Vol. 109:1081 importantly, when they operate to shut down abortio......
-
Schoolhouse Property.
...authorize the deprivation of such an interest, once conferred, without appropriate procedural safeguards.'" (quoting Arnett v. Kennedy, 416 U.S. 134, 167 (1974) (Powell, ]., concurring in part and concurring in result in (16.) Ky. Dep't of Corrs. v. Thompson, 490 U.S. 454,460 (1989). In oth......
-
VESTED RIGHTS, "FRANCHISES," AND THE SEPARATION OF POWERS.
...protections together with special procedures for termination, employees "must take the bitter with the sweet" (quoting Arnett v. Kennedy, 416 U.S. 134,154 (1974) (plurality opinion))); cf. United States v. Chi., Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pac. R.R. Co., 282 U.S. 311, 328 (1931) ("It long has......