Arnold Tours, Inc. v. Camp
Decision Date | 22 February 1972 |
Docket Number | Civ. A. No. 67-372-C. |
Citation | 338 F. Supp. 721 |
Parties | ARNOLD TOURS, INC., et al. v. William B. CAMP, Comptroller of the Currency, and South Shore National Bank. |
Court | U.S. District Court — District of Massachusetts |
Timothy J. Murphy and Richard W. Murphy, Boston, Mass., for plaintiffs.
John E. Shockey, Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, Washington, D. C., and Joseph L. Tauro, U. S. Atty., for the Dist. of Mass., for William B. Camp, Comptroller of the Currency.
Elliot V. Grabill and Arthur H. Bloomberg, of Grabill & Ley, Boston, Mass., for The South Shore National Bank.
The plaintiffs in this case are forty-two independent travel agencies doing business in various locations in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. They ask herein for declaratory and injunctive relief against the Comptroller of the Currency and against The South Shore National Bank. Plaintiffs seek from this court a decision that a ruling by the Comptroller providing that, incidental to their banking services national banks may provide travel services for their customers, violates the powers granted to the Comptroller by the National Bank Act, 12 U.S.C. § 24(Seventh). Plaintiffs allege that the Comptroller exceeded his statutory authority when he issued regulations authorizing national banks to provide travel agency services, and plaintiffs further allege that as a result they have lost substantial business and profits and stand to lose even greater business in the future. For the reasons stated hereinafter, I agree.
This rapidly aging matter has already been subjected to the attention of this court at numerous hearings, has twice been argued and decided by the United States Court of Appeals for this Circuit, and has twice been the subject matter of rulings of the Supreme Court of the United States on the basis of petitions for writs of certiorari which were granted in both instances. See 286 F. Supp. 770, aff'd. 408 F.2d 1147 (1 Cir. 1969), vacated and remanded 397 U.S. 315, 90 S.Ct. 1109, 25 L.Ed.2d 333. See, also, 428 F.2d 359 (1 Cir. 1970), reversed and remanded 400 U.S. 45, 91 S.Ct. 158, 27 L.Ed.2d 179.
The matter is now before this court on cross-motions for summary judgment, which have been extensively briefed by the parties. The narrow issue is, as stated by the Comptroller in a supplementary memorandum in support of his motion for summary judgment:
In deciding whether the operation of a travel agency business comes within the quoted language from 12 U.S.C. § 24, attention should next be focused on what, specifically, operating a travel agency entails on the part of the South Shore National Bank. The extent and nature of this activity qua travel agency has been described in detail in the Affidavit of Charles F. Heartfield, who served as vice-president in charge of the Travel Department of the South Shore National Bank from about November 1, 1966 to 1970. In pertinent part, the affidavit of Mr. Heartfield describes the travel agency business as follows:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Arnold Tours, Inc. v. Camp
...in the travel agency business and ordered the bank to divest itself of its travel department within six months. Arnold Tours, Inc. v. Camp, 338 F.Supp. 721 (D.Mass. 1972). The Comptroller and South Shore took separate appeals which we consolidated for purposes of argument and disposition. T......
-
AMERICAN SOC. OF TRAV. AGTS. v. BANK OF AMER. NT & SA
...Bank Act, 12 U.S.C. §§ 24 (seventh) and 1864.1 This case raises in a novel context issues which were litigated in Arnold Tours Inc. v. Camp, 338 F.Supp. 721 (D.Mass.1972), aff'd. 472 F.2d 427 (1st Cir. 1972), and Investment Company Institute v. Camp, 401 U.S. 617, 91 S.Ct. 1091, 28 L.Ed.2d ......
-
Independent Ins. Agents of Georgia v. Department of Banking & Finance of Georgia
...by the courts of this state; however, similar language has been interpreted by the federal courts. See, 12 U.S.C.A. 24(7), and Arnold Tours, Inc. v. Camp, 338 F.Supp. 721, aff'd, 472 F.2d 427 (1st Cir. 1972); American Society of Travel Agents v. Bank of America, 385 F.Supp. 1084 (1974); M &......