Arnold v. Malsby
| Decision Date | 13 July 1904 |
| Citation | Arnold v. Malsby, 120 Ga. 586, 48 S.E. 132 (Ga. 1904) |
| Parties | ARNOLD v. MALSBY et al |
| Court | Georgia Supreme Court |
Syllabus by the Court.
1. All previous verbal negotiations respecting the terms of sale of certain machinery are merged in the subsequent written contract of sale, and are inadmissible to vary or contradict the writing. Smith v. Newton, 59 Ga. 113 (5).
2. Where a written order for certain machinery stipulated that the seller should not "be held liable for damages for delay by railroads or failure of manufacturers in not shipping machinery," the seller is not liable to the purchaser for damages accruing from such delays.
3. The court did not err in directing a verdict for the plaintiff.
Error from Superior Court, Morgan County; H. M. Holden, Judge.
Action by A. H. Malsby and another, executors, against W. Arnold. Judgment for plaintiffs, and defendant brings error. Affirmed.
George & Anderson, for plaintiff in error.
C. L. Pettigrew and Foster & Butler, for defendants in error.
Judgment affirmed. All the Justices concurring.
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
-
Cottle v. Tomlinson
... ... agreement which has the effect of varying the terms of the ... written contract (Arnold v. Malsby, 120 Ga. 586, 48 ... S.E. 132; Capps v. Edwards, 130 Ga. 146(3), 60 S.E ... 455; Carroll v. Hutchinson, 2 Ga.App. 60(2)), 58 ... S.E ... ...
- Arnold v. Malsby