Arnold v. Nye

Decision Date14 July 1863
Citation11 Mich. 457
CourtMichigan Supreme Court
PartiesHiram Arnold v. Nelson B. Nye and others
Heard July 14, 1863

Motion to dismiss a writ of error. Affidavits being offered in support of the motion.

H. J. Beakes, for plaintiff in error, objected that some of the affidavits were entitled Hiram Arnold v. Nelson B. Nye et al.; and he claimed that, while such entitling might be sufficient in a notice, all the names of the parties must be given in the entitling of affidavits, or they were mere nullities.

T. M. Cooley, contra.

OPINION

The Court held that the affidavits objected to could not be read.

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT