Arpaio v. Obama

Docket Number14-5325
Decision Date14 August 2015

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
419 cases
  • Nw. Immigrant Rights Project v. U.S. Citizenship & Immigration Servs.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of Columbia
    • October 8, 2020
    ...2, 2020), and must do so "with the manner and degree of evidence required at the successive stages of the litigation," Arpaio v. Obama, 797 F.3d 11, 19 (D.C. Cir. 2015). As a result, to establish standing at the preliminary injunction stage, a plaintiff "must show a 'substantial likelihood'......
  • Pub. Citizen, Inc. v. Trump
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of Columbia
    • February 26, 2018
    ...can protect existing rules." Dkt. 47 at 23. The Court must, of course, accept well-pleaded factual allegations as true. Arpaio v. Obama , 797 F.3d 11, 19 (D.C. Cir. 2015). It may not, however, assume the truth of "mere conclusory statements," Williams v. Lew , 819 F.3d 466, 472 (D.C. Cir. 2......
  • Walen v. United States
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of Columbia
    • March 31, 2017
    ...the plaintiff bears the burden of demonstrating the court's subject-matter jurisdiction over the claims asserted. Arpaio v. Obama , 797 F.3d 11, 19 (D.C. Cir. 2015). " ‘Federal courts are courts of limited jurisdiction,’ possessing ‘only that power authorized by Constitution and statute.’ "......
  • Banner Health v. Burwell
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of Columbia
    • September 2, 2015
    ...Ultimately, the plaintiff bears the burden of establishing the Court's subject matter jurisdiction, Arpaio v. Obama, 797 F.3d 11, 18–19, 2015 WL 4772774, at *5 (D.C.Cir.2015), and where subject-matter jurisdiction does not exist, "the court cannot proceed at all in any cause." Steel Co. v. ......
  • Get Started for Free
2 books & journal articles
  • The New Public Standing.
    • United States
    • Stanford Law Review Vol. 71 No. 5, May 2019
    • May 1, 2019
    ...that an alleged injury must be "certainly impending" rather than "premised on a speculative chain of possibilities"). (354.) 797 F.3d 11 (D.C. Cir. 2015). (355.) See id. at (356.) See, e.g., Yvonne Wingett Sanchez, At 86, Joe Arpaio's Senate Run Worries GOP Voters. His Response: Age Doesn't......
  • 2015 Niagara international moot court competition.
    • United States
    • Canada-United States Law Journal Vol. 40 No. 1, March 2016
    • March 22, 2016
    ...of U.S. Citizens or Permanent Residence, Nov. 20, 2014. (130) Id. (131) Arpaio v. Obama, 27 F. Supp. 3d 185 (D.D.C. 2014), affd, 797 F.3d 11 (D.C. Cir. 2015). (132) Id.; United States v. Juarez-Escobar, 25 F. Supp. 3d 774 (W.D. Pa. (133) Boundary Waters Treaty, U.S.-Gr. Brit, (for Can.), Ja......