Arraleh v. County of Ramsey

Decision Date07 September 2006
Docket NumberNo. 05-4474.,05-4474.
Citation461 F.3d 967
PartiesRashid ARRALEH, Appellant, v. COUNTY OF RAMSEY; Terry Zurn, Individually, Appellees.
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Eighth Circuit

Leslie L. Lienemann, St. Paul, MN (Celeste E. Culberth, on the brief), for appellant.

Thomas E. Ring, St. Paul, MN (Susan Gaertner, on the brief), for appellee.

Before SMITH, HEANEY, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.

SMITH, Circuit Judge.

Rashid Arraleh sued his former employer, the County of Ramsey ("the County"), and his former supervisor, Terry Zurn, in his individual capacity, asserting claims under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17; 42 U.S.C § 1981; and the Minnesota Human Rights Act, Minn.Stat. § 363A.01-.41. Specifically, Arraleh alleged that the County discriminated against him on the basis of race and national origin. He further alleged that the County retaliated against him and created a hostile work environment. The district court1 granted summary judgment to the County and Zurn on all of Arraleh's claims. Arraleh appeals. We affirm.

I. Background

Workforce Solutions ("WFS") is a County program that assists people in finding gainful employment. In late 2001, WFS needed to hire an Employment Guidance Counselor ("EGC") to meet its obligations. Terry Zurn, supervisor for WFS's Displaced Worker Program, decided to hire a temporary, six-month EGC. Zurn, with approval of WFS's director, Patricia Brady, hired Rashid Arraleh. Arraleh, a black Muslim immigrant from Somalia, began working as an EGC on December 17, 2001. By state law and corresponding County personnel rules, Arraleh's temporary employment was predetermined to end no later than May 31, 2002. Arraleh accepted the position, hoping to obtain a permanent position with WFS.

To assist Arraleh in his new position, Zurn assigned Kim Kruelle, a Korean American with ten years' experience as an EGC, to mentor Arraleh. During Arraleh's six-month term, at least four of his WFS coworkers and at least two clients made complaints against him. Arraleh developed a history of double-booking, missing and appearing late for client appointments, leaving the office without signing out or informing his supervisor of where he was going, and poor customer service.2 Arraleh does not dispute his documented deficiencies; instead, he alleges that double-booking and missing appointments were common occurrences at WFS. Coworkers Donna Waldhauser, Loretta Novak, and Mary Haigh testified in support of Arraleh's claims.3

According to Arraleh, Zurn treated him differently than white employees. Specifically, Arraleh contends Zurn made a computer log of complaints against him but never did so for white employees. When complaints were lodged against other employees, Zurn simply spoke with the individual and made no record of the complaint. In contrast, when white employees complained about Arraleh, Zurn did not discuss the matter with him or disclose his computer log's contents.

Toward the end of Arraleh's six-month temporary employment, Zurn provided a letter of reference at Arraleh's request because Arraleh was looking for a job. In addition, Zurn informed Arraleh of an open part-time Resource Specialist position.

On May 22, 2002, Arraleh met with Brady to complain that he did not think it was fair that he was "excluded" from a department lunch party because only ham was served. During the meeting, Arraleh said he "spoke his heart out" regarding how he felt about the department. In response to his specific complaint about ham being served, Brady apologized, said that WFS "should have known better," and sent out an e-mail to the staff "to be sensitive to other people's religions."

Brady also asked Arraleh to put his other concerns about the department in writing. Arraleh did so. In his written complaint, Arraleh asserted that racism and race issues "are so fundamental in WFS that they seem almost an integral component." Specifically, Arraleh claimed to have witnessed coworkers "use words like `those people,' those damn Muslims." In addition, he overhead coworkers say "`[y]ou people are emotional[,]' referring to people of African descend [sic]." Also, Arraleh said that he "personally ha[d] been insulted, degraded, categorized as lazy and skipping work [sic]. While all along my supervisor knew where and what I was doing." He said that "[e]very time when two people of color go to lunch or talk there is imminent danger for WFS `white' staff" because "[t]hey assume that their jobs are in jeopardy or we are up to no good." Finally, Arraleh wrote that "[w]hen we get passed over for a position or not allow[ed] to participate on a committee or interviewing panel, we should understand that there were other factors involved not our race." Arraleh thinks he gave Brady the written complaint two days after their meeting. He "presumed she was going to find out what was going on" and "guess[ed] she did."

In response to the complaint, Brady contacted Zurn and advised him that Arraleh felt that the staff was singling him out because he was black and Muslim. Zurn responded that Arraleh's situation involved sub-par client service and that Arraleh's coworkers were distancing themselves from Arraleh because of their frustration with having to pick up Arraleh's workload. Brady also contacted George Hamm, her assigned Human Resources representative, asking him to follow up on Arraleh's complaint. In turn, Hamm contacted Arraleh, advised him that the County takes discrimination seriously, and set up an appointment with Arraleh on June 3, 2002. Arraleh canceled the appointment.

After Arraleh's complaints to Brady in May 2002, coworker Michael Ellison told Arraleh that he had "cooked his own goose" and there was no way that WFS would hire him for a permanent position. In addition, Arraleh claims to have overheard a conversation in which a County Planner told Zurn that "[g]iving [Arraleh] a job is like raising terrorist kids."

The County's temporary employees may apply for available permanent positions. When a department has an opening for a permanent position, it submits a request to the County's Human Resources Department for a list of eligible applicants. These lists, generated independently by Human Resources, contain the names of the top applicants based on points awarded for application-question responses and test scores. The department seeking the lists, in this case WFS, must hire individuals appearing on these lists.

Shortly after his hiring and during Arraleh's temporary employment, WFS requested four lists of eligible applicants from Human Resources. First, on January 29, 2002, WFS received a list that did not include Arraleh's name for any of four EGC openings. WFS hired two Asian persons, a Caucasian, and a Somali to fill these positions. Each of these hires was for the "Welfare to Work" section of WFS, not Zurn's Displaced Worker program where Arraleh worked. Second, on May 13, 2002, WFS received an updated list of eligibles to fill one EGC position. Arraleh's name did not appear on this list either. Third, on May 28, 2002, WFS requested a third updated list to fill two EGC Aide positions; Arraleh's name did appear on the list for these positions. Based upon his scores, Arraleh ranked 6th out of 13 eligible candidates and was interviewed for the positions. Finally, on June 3, 2002, Human Resources supplied WFS with a fourth updated list of eligibles to fill an EGC position. Arraleh appeared on the list of eligibles and ranked second out of the four applicants. He was not interviewed for this position.

Bruce Heinz, a WFS supervisor, and Zurn interviewed Arraleh for the EGC Aide positions. Prior to interviewing Arraleh they consulted Hamm, who advised them to follow the already-defined selection process and to interview and evaluate Arraleh in the same manner as any other candidate. Hamm advised Heinz and Zurn that the hiring process and Arraleh's complaint were separate matters and that Hamm would follow up on the latter with Arraleh in an exit interview.

After interviewing all of the applicants for the EGC Aide positions, Heinz and Zurn recommended to Brady that she hire Sharron Gates and JoAnn Mays. Both women are African American and ranked eighth and tenth on the list, respectively. WFS awarded the EGC position to an African-American male, Walter Rhodes, who ranked fourth on the final list of eligibles.

On June 21, 2002, Zurn wrote Arraleh a rejection letter, which stated that WFS's hiring decision "was based on our determination that the education and work experience of the candidate we selected best fits the requirements of this position."

Arraleh subsequently filed a charge of discrimination with the Minnesota Department of Human Rights and the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC). After receiving notices of his right to sue, Arraleh commenced this lawsuit, alleging that the County discriminated against him on account of his race and national origin by declining to hire him for continued employment, retaliated against him for the complaint he made to Brady and created a hostile work environment.

II. Discussion

Arraleh raises three arguments on appeal. First, he argues that the district court improperly granted summary judgment to WFS and Zurn on his failure to hire claim. Second, he argues that the district court erred by granting summary judgment to WFS and Zurn on his retaliation claim. Finally, he asserts that the district court erred by summarily dismissing his hostile work environment claim.

"We review grants of summary judgment de novo." Wojewski v. Rapid City Reg'l Hosp., Inc., 450 F.3d 338, 342 (8th Cir.2006) (internal quotations and citation omitted). "Summary judgment is appropriate when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law." Id. (internal quotations and citations omitted).

A. ...

To continue reading

Request your trial
149 cases
  • Royall v. Ass'n of Letter Carriers, Civil Action No. 05-1711 (RBW).
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of Columbia
    • 29 Agosto 2007
    ...entity's business decisions," Holcomb, 433 F.3d at 897 (internal quotation marks and citations omitted); see also Arraleh v. County of Ramsey, 461 F.3d 967, 976 (8th Cir.2006) (stating that "the employment discrimination laws have not vested in the federal courts the authority to sit as sup......
  • Goss v. Stream Global Servs., Inc.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Northern District of Iowa
    • 19 Marzo 2015
    ...the harassment and failed to respond in a prompt and effective manner."'" Anderson, 606 F.3d at 519 (quoting Arraleh v. County of Ramsey, 461 F.3d 967, 969 (8th Cir. 2006) (citation omitted)). 4. Goss does not mention being called any racist names in his Complaint. However, in his brief, Go......
  • Habben v. City of Fort Dodge
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Northern District of Iowa
    • 29 Enero 2007
    ...Hotel Servs., Inc., 339 F.3d 645, 653 (8th Cir. 2003) (internal quotations, alterations, and citation omitted). Arraleh v. County of Ramsey, 461 F.3d 967, 978-79 (8th Cir.2006). Habben cannot generate genuine issues of material fact on the required elements of her racial harassment claim. T......
  • Parada v. Great Plains Intern. of Sioux City, Inc.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Northern District of Iowa
    • 11 Abril 2007
    ...in judgment of an employer's business practices, so long as those practices are not discriminatory. See, e.g., Arraleh v. County of Ramsey, 461 F.3d 967, 976 (8th Cir. 2006) ("[T]he employment-discrimination laws have not vested in the federal courts the authority to sit as super-personnel ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
4 books & journal articles
  • Summary judgment
    • United States
    • James Publishing Practical Law Books Age Discrimination Litigation
    • 28 Abril 2022
    ...50 and ired him at age 55). Accord Fuller v. Panetta , 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 1841 (5th Cir. Jan. 31, 2012). • Arraleh v. Cty. of Ramsey , 461 F.3d 967, 976 (8th Cir. 2006). • Coghlan v. Am. Seafoods Co. LLC , 413 F.3d 1090, 1097 (9th Cir. 2005) (“In cases where the same actor was responsible......
  • Race and national origin discrimination
    • United States
    • James Publishing Practical Law Books Federal Employment Jury Instructions - Volume I
    • 30 Abril 2014
    ...motivating factor if the same person hired and fired the employee within a relatively short period of time. Arraleh v. County of Ramsey , 461 F.3d 967 (8th Cir. 2006). Ninth: The Ninth Circuit has held that the same-actor inference could be applied to cases where action took place over a pe......
  • Summary Judgment Practice and Procedure
    • United States
    • James Publishing Practical Law Books Litigating Employment Discrimination Cases. Volume 1-2 Volume 2 - Practice
    • 1 Mayo 2023
    ...evidence, that, if believed, proves the existence of a fact without inference or presumption). See, e.g., Arraleh v. County of Ramsey, 461 F.3d 967, 975 (8th Cir. 2006) (“[A] plaintiff may survive the defendant’s motion for summary judgment in one of two ways. First, the plaintiff may prese......
  • Summary Judgment
    • United States
    • James Publishing Practical Law Books Employment Evidence
    • 1 Abril 2022
    ...... That inference is ‘something for the trier of fact to consider.’”)(citations and quotations omitted); Arraleh v. Cnty. of Ramsey , 461 F.3d 967, 976 (8th Cir. 2006) (strong inference that no discrimination occurred exists when same actor hires and fires employee in a short time period);......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT