Arrington v. United States, No. 02-8740.

CourtUnited States Supreme Court
Citation537 U.S. 1241
Docket NumberNo. 02-8740.
PartiesARRINGTON v. UNITED STATES.
Decision Date03 March 2003
537 U.S. 1241
ARRINGTON
v.
UNITED STATES.
No. 02-8740.
Supreme Court of United States.
March 3, 2003.

CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT.


C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 309 F. 3d 40.

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 practice notes
  • United States v. Arrington, No. 12–3073.
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (District of Columbia)
    • August 22, 2014
    ...release. This court affirmed the district court's judgment. United States v. Arrington, 309 F.3d 40 (D.C.Cir.2002), cert. denied,537 U.S. 1241, 123 S.Ct. 1373, 155 L.Ed.2d 212 (2003). In December 2003, Arrington filed a pro se motion for post-conviction relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. Arring......
  • United States v. Arrington, No. 19-3086
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (District of Columbia)
    • July 13, 2021
    ...untimely, since his limitation period would have begun to run when his conviction became final in 2003. See Arrington v. United States , 537 U.S. 1241, 123 S.Ct. 1373, 155 L.Ed.2d 212 (2003) (denying petition for a writ of certiorari on direct review); Clay v. United States , 537 U.S. 522, ......
  • United States v. Arpjngton, No. 12-3073
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (District of Columbia)
    • August 22, 2014
    ...release. This court affirmed the district court's judgment. United States v. Arrington, 309 F.3d 40 (D.C. Cir. 2002), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 1241 (2003). In December 2003, Arrington filed a pro se motion for post-conviction relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. Arrington again raised neither of th......
  • United States v. Arrington, No. 1:00-cr-00159 (RCL)
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. United States District Court (Columbia)
    • September 24, 2019
    ...Arrington's conviction became final on March 3, 2003—the date his petition for certiorari was denied. Arrington v. United States, 537 U.S. 1241 (2003). Therefore Arrington relies on another measuring event: "the date on which the right asserted was initially recognized by the Supreme Court,......
4 cases
  • United States v. Arrington, No. 12–3073.
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (District of Columbia)
    • August 22, 2014
    ...release. This court affirmed the district court's judgment. United States v. Arrington, 309 F.3d 40 (D.C.Cir.2002), cert. denied,537 U.S. 1241, 123 S.Ct. 1373, 155 L.Ed.2d 212 (2003). In December 2003, Arrington filed a pro se motion for post-conviction relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. Arring......
  • United States v. Arrington, No. 19-3086
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (District of Columbia)
    • July 13, 2021
    ...untimely, since his limitation period would have begun to run when his conviction became final in 2003. See Arrington v. United States , 537 U.S. 1241, 123 S.Ct. 1373, 155 L.Ed.2d 212 (2003) (denying petition for a writ of certiorari on direct review); Clay v. United States , 537 U.S. 522, ......
  • United States v. Arpjngton, No. 12-3073
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (District of Columbia)
    • August 22, 2014
    ...release. This court affirmed the district court's judgment. United States v. Arrington, 309 F.3d 40 (D.C. Cir. 2002), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 1241 (2003). In December 2003, Arrington filed a pro se motion for post-conviction relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. Arrington again raised neither of th......
  • United States v. Arrington, No. 1:00-cr-00159 (RCL)
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. United States District Court (Columbia)
    • September 24, 2019
    ...Arrington's conviction became final on March 3, 2003—the date his petition for certiorari was denied. Arrington v. United States, 537 U.S. 1241 (2003). Therefore Arrington relies on another measuring event: "the date on which the right asserted was initially recognized by the Supreme Court,......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT