Arrow Carrier Corp v. United States
| Decision Date | 20 January 1964 |
| Docket Number | No. 467,467 |
| Citation | 84 S.Ct. 524,375 U.S. 452,11 L.Ed.2d 477 |
| Parties | ARROW CARRIER CORP. v. UNITED STATES et al |
| Court | U.S. Supreme Court |
Christian V. Graf, for appellant.
Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Orrick, Lionel Kestenbaum, Robert W. Ginnane and H. Neil Garson, for the United States and the Interstate Commerce Commission.
William A. Goichman, Joseph C. Bruno and Edward Munce, for the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission.
Ernest R. von Starck, Robert H. Young and Carl Helmetag, Jr., for the Pennsylvania Railroad Co. and others.
The motion of Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission to be added as a party appellee is granted. The motion to correct the caption to include the Pennsylvania Railroad Company, Highway Express Lines, Inc., and Modern Transfer Co., Inc., as parties appellee is granted. The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
U.S. v. Essex
... ... 734 F.2d 832 ... 236 U.S.App.D.C. 166 ... UNITED STATES of America ... Daphne W. ESSEX, Appellant ... ...
-
Zirger v. General Acc. Ins. Co.
... ... The carrier's insistence on arbitration undoubtedly derives from its ... UM and UIM coverage has prompted courts in several states to override and invalidate provisions in the UM/UIM ... Classified Ins. Corp. of Wis., 179 Wis.2d 386, 507 N.W.2d 149, 154-55 (App.1993) ... on that issue against a particular litigant." In United Rental Equipment Co. v. Aetna Life & Casualty Ins. Co., 74 ... ...
-
Jimmy Swaggart Ministries v. State Bd. of Equalization
... ... of this argument, Ministries relies primarily on the United States Supreme Court's 1943 decision in Murdock v ... ...
- United States v. Grasso