Arsenis v. Borough of Bernardsville

Docket NumberDOCKET NO. A-0603-21
Decision Date28 June 2023
Citation298 A.3d 366,476 N.J. Super. 195
PartiesC. ARSENIS, S. Arsenis, and G. Arsenis, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. BOROUGH OF BERNARDSVILLE, Edward Kerwin, Tax Assessor, Tom Czerniecki, Borough Administrator, and Anthony Suriano, Borough Clerk, Defendants-Respondents.
CourtNew Jersey Superior Court — Appellate Division

476 N.J.Super. 195
298 A.3d 366

C. ARSENIS, S. Arsenis, and G. Arsenis, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
BOROUGH OF BERNARDSVILLE, Edward Kerwin, Tax Assessor, Tom Czerniecki, Borough Administrator, and Anthony Suriano, Borough Clerk, Defendants-Respondents.

DOCKET NO. A-0603-21

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Submitted September 21, 2022
Decided June 28, 2023


Hegge & Confusione, LLC, attorneys for appellants (Michael Confusione, of counsel and on the brief).

Parker McCay, PA, attorneys for respondents (John C. Gillespie, and Alexis C. Smith, Mount Laurel, on the brief).

Chiesa Shahinian & Giantomasi, PC, and Zipp & Tannenbaum, LLC, attorneys for amicus curiae Association of Municipal Assessors of New Jersey (John R. Lloyd and Peter J. Zipp, Jamesburg, of counsel and on the brief).

Before Judges Haas, DeAlmeida, and Mitterhoff.

The opinion of the court was delivered by

DeALMEIDA, J.A.D.

476 N.J.Super. 199

We consider whether the Superior Court has jurisdiction to adjudicate claims for monetary damages, filed years after the statutory deadline for filing a tax appeal, based on allegations that municipal officials committed fraud and other torts by assessing real property in a manner inconsistent with law and at an amount above its true market value. We conclude that the Superior Court lacks jurisdiction to hear such claims because they are substantively equivalent to a tax appeal properly venued in the Tax Court or a county board of taxation, and the statutory deadlines for challenging local property tax assessments may not be circumvented

476 N.J.Super. 200

by a late-filed complaint seeking damages for alleged torts arising from the tax assessment process. In light of these conclusions, we affirm the trial court order dismissing the complaint in this matter with prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.

I.

In 2012, plaintiffs C. Arsenis, S. Arsenis, and G. Arsenis purchased residential real property in defendant Borough of Bernardsville for $6,267,500. The parcels are designated in the records of the municipality as Block 16, Lots 5 and 6.01.

Starting in 2013, and in every year thereafter, plaintiffs submitted a forest management plan seeking to qualify a portion

298 A.3d 369

of the property for assessment under the Farmland Assessment Act of 1964, N.J.S.A. 54:4-23.1 to -23.23. Pursuant to annual district-wide reassessments and plaintiffs’ farmland assessment applications, the property was assessed for local property tax purposes as follows:

Block 16, Lot 6.01

YearAcresLandImprovementsTotal
20125$795,000$1,694,500$2,489,500
20135$755,000$2,224,400$2,979,400
20144$664,000$2,394,300$3,058,300
20154$664,000$2,475,800$3,139,800
20164$664,000$2,509,900$3,173,900
20174$664,000$2,417,800$3,081,800
20184$628,000$2,321,600$2,949,600
20194$588,000$2,732,000$3,320,000
20203$536,000$2,673,800$3,209,800

Block 16, Lot 6.01, Qual. Q0017

476 N.J.Super. 201
YearAcresLandImprovementsTotal
201247.58$7,300$0$7,300
201347.58$7,300$0$7,300
201448$6,300$0$6,300
201548$6,300$0$6,300
201648$6,200$0$6,200
201749$6,400$0$6,400
201849$6,500$0$6,500
201949$2,700$0$2,700
202049$6,000$0$6,000

Block 16, Lot 5, Qual. Q0017

298 A.3d 370
YearAcresLandImprovementsTotal
2012.5$100$0$100
2013.5$100$0$100
2014.5$100$0$100
2015.5$100$0$100
2016.5$100$0$100
2017.5$100$0$100
2018.5$100$0$100
2019.5$100$0$100
2020.5$13,000$0$13,000

Plaintiffs did not file complaints in the Tax Court or petitions in the Somerset County Board of Taxation (Board) challenging the assessments on their property for tax years 2013 through 2019.See N.J.S.A. 54:3-21 (establishing deadlines for filing a petition of appeal with a county board of taxation and, for properties assessed in excess of $1,000,000, a complaint with the Tax Court, challenging the annual assessment on real property for local property tax purposes.).1

476 N.J.Super. 202

On March 14, 2021, plaintiffs filed...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT