Arterbury v. United States, 11759.
| Court | Texas Court of Appeals |
| Writing for the Court | Graves |
| Citation | Arterbury v. United States, 194 S.W.2d 803 (Tex. App. 1946) |
| Decision Date | 31 January 1946 |
| Docket Number | No. 11759.,11759. |
| Parties | ARTERBURY et al. v. UNITED STATES NAT. BANK OF GALVESTON et al. |
Appeal from District Court, Galveston County; C. G. Dibrell, Judge.
Suit by the United States National Bank of Galveston, trustee, and others against R L. Arterbury, trustee, and others, under the Declaratory Judgments Act and the Texas Trust Act. From an order overruling the several pleas of privilege filed by the named defendant and others, the named defendant and others appeal.
Affirmed.
Walter F. Woodul, Roy L. Arterbury, A. D. Dyess, and Fulbright, Crooker, Freeman & Bates, all of Houston, and Dan Moody, of Austin, for appellant.
Terry, Cavin & Mills, of Galveston, for appellee.
This appeal is from an order of the 56th District Court of Galveston County, Texas, made and entered September 27, 1945, after hearing before the court, without the intervention of a jury, overruling the several pleas of privilege filed by appellants, T. C. Green, Mrs. Mildred Eldridge Green, Walter F. Woodul, Mrs. Walter F. Woodul, R. J. Bauereisen, Mrs. Ivy Bauereisen, Guardian Trust Company, Walter F. Woodul, trustee, and R. L. Arterbury, trustee, respectively.
The appellees are: The United States National Bank of Galveston, Texas; William Randle Eldridge; W. T. Eldridge, III; Laura Eldridge Hospital; Sugarland Independent School District; I. H. Kempner, individually and as trustee for the Sugarland Industries, under a declaration of trust dated January 1, 1919; D. W. Kempner, as trustee for the Sugarland Industries under a declaration of trust dated January 1, 1919; G. D. Ulrich, as trustee for the Sugarland Industries under a declaration of trust dated January 1, 1919; and Walter F. Woodul, Jr.
The suit was brought in Galveston County against the appellants, nonresidents thereof, and others who did not file pleas of privilege, by the appellee, United States National Bank, as trustee in the administration of its trust, under both the Declaratory Judgments Act, art. 2524—1, § 4, Vernon's Texas Civil Statutes, and the Texas Trust Act. Art. 7425b—1 et seq., Vernon's Texas Civil Statutes, and venue was claimed under subdivision 4 of Article 1995, under the Declaratory Judgments Act, and under Sections 24, subd. A and 24, subd. B of the Texas Trust Act, Vernon's Ann.Civ.St. art. 7425b—24, subds. A, B.
It alleged that two of those it sued— the appellees I. H. and D. W. Kempner— were residents of Galveston County, and sought "direction to it to do, or abstain from doing, the particular act mentioned in the petition, that is, extending the Sugarland Industries Declaration of Trust beyond December 31, 1945, and to determine a question arising in the administration of the Sugarland Industries Trust and the construction of the writing creating the trust."
The appellee Bank further, in its controverting affidavits to appellants' pleas of privilege, thus more fully than in its original petition as plaintiff in the suit, alleged both the nature of the suit itself and the grounds upon which it claimed the venue thereof to have been properly laid in Galveston County, to-wit:
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
-
Anderson v. McRae
...and should not be hedged about by technicalities. Cobb v. Harrington, 144 Tex. 360, 190 S.W.2d 709 (1945); Arterbury v. United States Nat. Bank of Galveston, 194 S.W.2d 803 (Tex.Civ.App. Galveston 1946, no writ). The remedy does not supplant those already existing, but it is an alternate or......
-
Zodiac Corp. v. General Elec. Credit Corp.
...Allen v. Alison Mortgage Investment Trust, 548 S.W.2d 783, 788 (Tex.Civ.App.-San Antonio 1977, n. w. h.); also see Arterbury v. United States, 194 S.W.2d 803, 807 (Tex.Civ.App.-Galveston 1946, n. w. Appellants in their fourth point of error complain of the admission in evidence of the guara......
-
Donald v. Carr, 16846
... ... alleges that Relators are citizens of the State of Texas and of the United States; that they are qualified voters under the laws and Constitution of ... Harrington, 144 Tex. 360, 190 S.W.2d 709, 172 A.L.R. 837; Arterbury ... v. United States Nat'l Bank, 194 S.W.2d 803 (Tex.Civ.App., no writ ... ...
-
Crow v. City of Corpus Christi
...Dodgen, Sec., et al. v. Depuglio, Tex.Sup., 209 S.W. 2d 588; Cobb v. Harrington, 144 Tex. 360, 190 S.W.2d 709; Arterbury v. United States, Tex.Civ.App., 194 S.W.2d 803. We are in accord with the holding of the court of civil appeals that the sections of the ordinances requiring collection o......