Arthur Spear, Claimant of the Schooner Lucy Ann and Cargo, Appellant v. Henry Place, Libellant For Himself and Others
Decision Date | 01 December 1850 |
Citation | 11 How. 522,13 L.Ed. 796,52 U.S. 522 |
Parties | ARTHUR SPEAR, CLAIMANT OF THE SCHOONER LUCY ANN AND CARGO, APPELLANT, v. HENRY PLACE, LIBELLANT, FOR HIMSELF AND OTHERS |
Court | U.S. Supreme Court |
To continue reading
Request your trial3 cases
-
Gibson v. Shufeldt
...on the property of each owner is within it, no appeal lies, either by the salvors or by the owners. Stratton v. Jarvis, 8 Pet. 4; Spear v. Place, 11 How. 522. The reasons for this were summed up by Chief Justice TANEY as follows: 'The salvage service is entire; but the goods of each owner a......
-
San Juan Fruit Co. v. Carrillo, 1837.
...in each case being insufficient, this court had no jurisdiction of the appeal of any claimant. A similar ruling was made in Spear v. Place, 11 How. 522 13 L. Ed. 796. In Paving Co. v. Mulford, 100 U. S. 147 25 L. Ed. 591 a bill, filed against two defendants, alleging that each held certific......
-
Ex parte Baltimore & Ohio R. Co. Petitioner
...appeal. It is impossible to distinguish this case in principle from Oliver v. Alexander, 6 Pet. 143; Stratton v. Jarvis, 8 Pet. 4; Spear v. Place, 11 How. 522, and Rich v. Lambert, 12 How. 347, under which, for half a century, it has been held that when in admiralty distinct causes of actio......