Arthur Spear, Claimant of the Schooner Lucy Ann and Cargo, Appellant v. Henry Place, Libellant For Himself and Others

Decision Date01 December 1850
Citation11 How. 522,13 L.Ed. 796,52 U.S. 522
PartiesARTHUR SPEAR, CLAIMANT OF THE SCHOONER LUCY ANN AND CARGO, APPELLANT, v. HENRY PLACE, LIBELLANT, FOR HIMSELF AND OTHERS
CourtU.S. Supreme Court

To continue reading

Request your trial
3 cases
  • Gibson v. Shufeldt
    • United States
    • U.S. Supreme Court
    • May 23, 1887
    ...on the property of each owner is within it, no appeal lies, either by the salvors or by the owners. Stratton v. Jarvis, 8 Pet. 4; Spear v. Place, 11 How. 522. The reasons for this were summed up by Chief Justice TANEY as follows: 'The salvage service is entire; but the goods of each owner a......
  • San Juan Fruit Co. v. Carrillo, 1837.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — First Circuit
    • July 7, 1925
    ...in each case being insufficient, this court had no jurisdiction of the appeal of any claimant. A similar ruling was made in Spear v. Place, 11 How. 522 13 L. Ed. 796. In Paving Co. v. Mulford, 100 U. S. 147 25 L. Ed. 591 a bill, filed against two defendants, alleging that each held certific......
  • Ex parte Baltimore & Ohio R. Co. Petitioner
    • United States
    • U.S. Supreme Court
    • October 30, 1882
    ...appeal. It is impossible to distinguish this case in principle from Oliver v. Alexander, 6 Pet. 143; Stratton v. Jarvis, 8 Pet. 4; Spear v. Place, 11 How. 522, and Rich v. Lambert, 12 How. 347, under which, for half a century, it has been held that when in admiralty distinct causes of actio......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT