Arthur v. Comm'r of Corr.
| Decision Date | 26 January 2016 |
| Docket Number | No. 37403.,37403. |
| Citation | Arthur v. Comm'r of Corr., 162 Conn.App. 606, 131 A.3d 1267 (Conn. App. 2016) |
| Court | Connecticut Court of Appeals |
| Parties | Johnnie ARTHUR v. COMMISSIONER OF CORRECTION. |
Stephen Lebedevitch, with whom, on the brief, was Stephanie M. O'Neil, for the appellant (petitioner).
Rocco A. Chiarenza, assistant state's attorney, with whom, on the brief, were Kevin D. Lawlor, state's attorney, and Erika L. Brookman, assistant state's attorney, for the appellee (respondent).
SHELDON, KELLER and FLYNN, Js.
Upon a grant of certification to appeal, the petitioner, Johnnie Arthur, appeals from the judgment of the habeas court denying his amended petition for a writ of habeas corpus. On appeal, the petitioner claims that the habeas court's decision should be reversed because that court erred by not concluding that the petitioner's trial counsel, Attorney Lawrence Hopkins, rendered ineffective assistance based upon (1) the manner in which he addressed evidence related to the cellular telephone (cell phone) records of the petitioner's girlfriend, which were offered into evidence by the state and admitted at the petitioner's criminal trial,1 and (2) his failure to call as a trial witness a taxi driver who was present at the scene of the crime. We affirm the judgment of the habeas court.
The following procedural history and facts are relevant to the present appeal. In 2009, the petitioner was convicted, following a jury trial, of (1) attempt to commit murder, (2) assault in the first degree, (3) criminal possession of a firearm, and (4) carrying a pistol or revolver without a permit. This court, in affirming the petitioner's conviction on direct appeal, State v. Arthur, 128 Conn.App. 371, 18 A.3d 610, cert. denied, 302 Conn. 910, 23 A.3d 1249 (2011), stated that the jury could have reasonably found the following facts. "On the evening of September 29, 2007, the victim, Andrew Garnett, attended a party at the Sports Haven nightclub in New Haven with friends, including Dionte Dixon. While there, they met Nancy Sonemaneevong, Barbara ‘Shanita’ Green and the [petitioner's] girlfriend, Robin DiBenedetto. Green informed Dixon that she had a crush on his friend, Eugene Wright, and Dixon arranged for her to meet Wright later that evening. When the party ended, those individuals departed for Wright's apartment at 30 Glade Street in West Haven. Dixon drove his own car, the victim rode in a second vehicle with other friends, and DiBenedetto drove Sonemaneevong and Green in her red Pontiac Grand Am. At that time, DiBenedetto was speaking with the [petitioner] on her cellular telephone.
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
-
State v. Turner
...whether the evidence at issue is the type of scientific evidence contemplated by Porter . See, e.g., Arthur v. Commissioner of Correction , 162 Conn. App. 606, 621–22, 131 A.3d 1267, cert. denied, 323 Conn. 915, 149 A.3d 496 (2016). At the time of the defendant's trial in the present case, ......
- State v. Ralph B.
-
Carpenter v. Comm'r of Corr.
...occurs is referred to as a Porter hearing." (Citations omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) Arthur v. Commissioner of Correction, 162 Conn.App. 606, 621–22, 131 A.3d 1267, cert. denied, 323 Conn. 915, 149 A.3d 496 (2016).6 The Supreme Court provided further guidance on the issue of c......
-
Mercado v. Comm'r of Corr.
...of the challenged evidence would have changed the result of the petitioner's criminal trial. See, e.g., Arthur v. Commissioner of Correction , 162 Conn. App. 606, 624, 131 A.3d 1267 ("we conclude on the basis of our review of the evidence that the petitioner cannot demonstrate prejudice bec......