Arthur Young & Co. v. Black
| Decision Date | 10 January 1984 |
| Court | New York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals |
| Parties | , 460 N.E.2d 1105 ARTHUR YOUNG & COMPANY, Appellant, v. Robert W. BLACK, Respondent. |
Appeal dismissed without costs, by the Court sua sponte, upon the ground that the question certified does not present a question of law decisive of the correctness of the determination of the Appellate Division, 97 A.D.2d 369, 466 N.Y.S.2d 10.
To continue reading
Request your trial
6 cases
-
Leon M. Reimer & Co., PC v. Cipolla
...may be enforced. See Arthur Young & Co. v. Black, 97 A.D.2d 369, 466 N.Y.S.2d 10 (1st Dept.1983), appeal dismissed, 61 N.Y.2d 712, 472 N.Y.S.2d 620, 460 N.E.2d 1105 (1984) and Arthur Young & Co. v. Galasso, 142 Misc.2d 738, 538 N.Y.S.2d 424 Here, Reimer placed Cipolla in a position of trust......
-
In re Hirschhorn, Bankruptcy No. 190-14584-260
...element. The Debtor relies on Arthur Young & Co. v. Black, 97 A.D.2d 369, 466 N.Y.S.2d 10 (1983), appeal dismissed, 61 N.Y.2d 712, 472 N.Y.S.2d 620, 460 N.E.2d 1105 (1984), for the proposition that the loss of $36,500 of business is not irreparable harm. It is apparent to this Court that co......
-
Vanderminden v. Vanderminden
...were purely monetary (see, e.g., Arthur Young & Co. v. Black, 97 A.D.2d 369, 370, 466 N.Y.S.2d 10, appeal dismissed 61 N.Y.2d 712, 472 N.Y.S.2d 620, 460 N.E.2d 1105). In our view, the irreparable injury prong has been We also reject defendants' assertion that the balancing of the equities t......
-
Michael I. Weintraub, M.D., P.C. v. Schwartz
...breach of the restrictive covenant (see, Arthur Young & Co. v. Black, 97 A.D.2d 369, 466 N.Y.S.2d 10, appeal dismissed 61 N.Y.2d 712, 472 N.Y.S.2d 620, 460 N.E.2d 1105). Thus, in view of the plaintiffs' failure to demonstrate a likelihood of success on the merits and an immediate threat of ......
Request a trial to view additional results