ARTS4ALL, LTD v. Hancock, No. 09-699.

CourtU.S. Supreme Court
PartiesARTS4ALL, LTD, petitioner, v. Judith L. HANCOCK.
Decision Date25 January 2010
Docket NumberNo. 09-699.

130 S.Ct. 1301

ARTS4ALL, LTD, petitioner,
v.
Judith L. HANCOCK.

No. 09-699.

Supreme Court of United States.

January 25, 2010.


Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of New York denied.

To continue reading

Request your trial
14 practice notes
  • CDR Créances S.A. v. Cohen
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court Appellate Division
    • December 27, 2012
    ...54 A.D.3d 286, 863 N.Y.S.2d 193 [1st Dept. 2008],affd.12 N.Y.3d 846, 881 N.Y.S.2d 390, 909 N.E.2d 83 [2009],cert. denied––– U.S. ––––, 130 S.Ct. 1301, 175 L.Ed.2d 1076 [2010] ). The ample record is more than sufficient to demonstrate appellants' utter disregard for the judicial process, and......
  • Watson v. City of N.Y., 4377
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court Appellate Division
    • January 16, 2018
    ...A.D.3d 286, 287, 863 N.Y.S.2d 193 [1st Dept. 2008], affd 12 N.Y.3d 846, 881 N.Y.S.2d 390, 909 N.E.2d 83 [2009], cert denied 559 U.S. 905, 130 S.Ct. 1301, 175 L.Ed.2d 1076 [2010] ). "[I]t generally is within the discretion of the motion court to determine the appropriate penalty to be i......
  • CDR Creances S.A.S. v. Cohen
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court Appellate Division
    • October 19, 2010
    ...Hancock, 54 A.D.3d 286, 863 N.Y.S.2d 193 [2008], affd. 12 N.Y.3d 846, 881 N.Y.S.2d 390, 909 N.E.2d 83 [2009], cert. denied --- U.S. ----, 130 S.Ct. 1301, --- L.Ed.2d ---- [2010] ). We find that plaintiff failed to make the requisite "strong showing" of an overriding necessity for ......
  • Richardson v. Schindler
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court Appellate Division
    • May 25, 2010
    ...54 A.D.3d 286, 287, 863 N.Y.S.2d 193 [2008], affd. 12 N.Y.3d 846, 881 N.Y.S.2d 390, 909 N.E.2d 83 [2009], cert. denied ––– U.S. ––––, 130 S.Ct. 1301, 175 L.Ed.2d 1076 [2010] ). Thus, a penalty imposed pursuant to CPLR 3126 should not be readily disturbed absent a clear abuse of discretion (......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
14 cases
  • CDR Créances S.A. v. Cohen
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court Appellate Division
    • December 27, 2012
    ...54 A.D.3d 286, 863 N.Y.S.2d 193 [1st Dept. 2008],affd.12 N.Y.3d 846, 881 N.Y.S.2d 390, 909 N.E.2d 83 [2009],cert. denied––– U.S. ––––, 130 S.Ct. 1301, 175 L.Ed.2d 1076 [2010] ). The ample record is more than sufficient to demonstrate appellants' utter disregard for the judicial process, and......
  • Watson v. City of N.Y., 4377
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court Appellate Division
    • January 16, 2018
    ...A.D.3d 286, 287, 863 N.Y.S.2d 193 [1st Dept. 2008], affd 12 N.Y.3d 846, 881 N.Y.S.2d 390, 909 N.E.2d 83 [2009], cert denied 559 U.S. 905, 130 S.Ct. 1301, 175 L.Ed.2d 1076 [2010] ). "[I]t generally is within the discretion of the motion court to determine the appropriate penalty to be i......
  • CDR Creances S.A.S. v. Cohen
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court Appellate Division
    • October 19, 2010
    ...Hancock, 54 A.D.3d 286, 863 N.Y.S.2d 193 [2008], affd. 12 N.Y.3d 846, 881 N.Y.S.2d 390, 909 N.E.2d 83 [2009], cert. denied --- U.S. ----, 130 S.Ct. 1301, --- L.Ed.2d ---- [2010] ). We find that plaintiff failed to make the requisite "strong showing" of an overriding necessity for ......
  • Richardson v. Schindler
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court Appellate Division
    • May 25, 2010
    ...54 A.D.3d 286, 287, 863 N.Y.S.2d 193 [2008], affd. 12 N.Y.3d 846, 881 N.Y.S.2d 390, 909 N.E.2d 83 [2009], cert. denied ––– U.S. ––––, 130 S.Ct. 1301, 175 L.Ed.2d 1076 [2010] ). Thus, a penalty imposed pursuant to CPLR 3126 should not be readily disturbed absent a clear abuse of discretion (......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT