Arvai v. First Federal Sav. & Loan Ass'n, 82-1394
| Decision Date | 20 January 1983 |
| Docket Number | No. 82-1394,82-1394 |
| Citation | 698 F.2d 683 |
| Parties | Richard S. ARVAI and Ellen M. Arvai, Appellants, v. FIRST FEDERAL SAVINGS & LOAN ASSOCIATION, Appellee. |
| Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Fourth Circuit |
Roger L. Couch, Spartanburg, S.C. (Henderson, Lister, Couch, Brandt & Ackermann, Spartanburg, S.C., on brief), for appellants.
Mason A. Goldsmith, Greenville, S.C. (Love, Thornton, Arnold & Thomason, Greenville, S.C., on brief), for appellee.
Before PHILLIPS and CHAPMAN, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
Plaintiffs Richard S. and Ellen M. Arvai appeal the dismissal of their action under the National Flood Insurance Act, 42 U.S.C. Secs. 4001 et seq., against defendant First Federal Savings & Loan Association. The Arvais alleged that First Federal failed to comply with the provisions of Sec. 4012a(b) and Sec. 4104(a) of the Act. The district court held that no private right of action existed under the Act and accordingly dismissed the complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted. We affirm.
The general mandate of Sec. 4012a(b) is that federally regulated lenders shall not make loans secured by improved realty located in flood hazard areas unless the property is covered by flood insurance. Similarly, Sec. 4104(a) requires these same lenders to notify purchasers that the improved realty is located in a flood hazard area. The facts, taken in the light most favorable to the Arvais, are that they purchased flood-prone property with funds secured by the property and obtained from a federally regulated lender, First Federal. First Federal failed to comply with the requirements of Sec. 4012a(b) and Sec. 4104(a). The Arvais' property was subsequently flooded and suffered non-insured flood damage. The Arvais sought monetary relief against First Federal for its noncompliance under the Act.
Because the Act, by its terms, does not expressly grant plaintiffs a private cause of action, the Arvais proceeded on the theory that the Act created an implied private action. The district court correctly analyzed this claim under the standard of Cort v. Ash, 422 U.S. 66, 95 S.Ct. 2080, 45 L.Ed.2d 26 (1975), and its progeny. After scrutinizing the language and legislative history of the Act, the district court found that the Arvais as borrowers were not in a class for whose especial benefit the Act was passed. The court further found no specific congressional intent to allow a private...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Jackson v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
...recent appellate opinions we have cited thoroughly analyze the issues, we forego further discussion."); Arvai v. First Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass'n, 698 F.2d 683, 684 (4th Cir.1983) (mortgagors are not within the class sought to be protected by the Act and there is no suggestion in the legislativ......
-
Fleischer v. U.S. Dept. of Veterans Affairs
...737 F.2d 638, 642-43 (7th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1160, 105 S.Ct. 911, 83 L.Ed.2d 924 (1985); Arvai v. First Fed. Sav. & Loan Assn., 698 F.2d 683, 684 (4th Cir.1983); Till v. Unifirst Fed. Sav. & Loan Assn., 653 F.2d 152, 160-61 (5th Cir.1981); Segall v. Rapkin, 875 F.Supp. 240, 2......
-
Virgin Islands Tree Boa v. Witt
...somehow put the National Flood Insurance Program on St. Thomas in jeopardy of being suspended. Cf. Arvai v. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n, 698 F.2d 683, 684 (4th Cir.1983) (per curiam) (concluding that no private cause of action existed for borrowers to bring suit against lenders for f......
-
Lehmann v. Arnold
...Association (5th Cir.1981), 653 F.2d 152; Arvai v. First Federal Savings & Loan Association (D.S.C.1982), 539 F.Supp. 921, aff'd (4th Cir.1983), 698 F.2d 683; Brill v. Northern California Savings & Loan Association (N.D.Cal.1982), 555 F.Supp. 566.) In addition, two state courts have refused......