Asakura v. City of Seattle, 211
| Decision Date | 25 February 1924 |
| Docket Number | No. 211,211 |
| Citation | 44 S.Ct. 515,68 L.Ed. 1041,265 U.S. 332 |
| Parties | ASAKURA v. CITY OF SEATTLE et al |
| Court | U.S. Supreme Court |
To continue reading
Request your trial
101 cases
-
Sei Fujii v. State
...own citizens. BACARDI CORP. V. DOMENECH, 311 U.S. 150, 158-159, 61 S.CT. 219, 224, 85 L.ED. 98;4 Asakura v. City of Seattle, 265 U.S. 332, 340, 44 S.Ct. 515, 516, 68 L.Ed. 1041; see Maiorano v. Baltimore & Ohio R. Co., 213 U.S. 268, 273-274, 29 S.Ct. 424, 425-426, 53 L.Ed. 792; Chew Heong v......
-
Sanchez-Llamas v. Bustillo, Nos. 04–10566
...the respective laws grant ... in each of these states to the subjects of the most favored nation.’ ” And in Asakura v. Seattle, 265 U.S. 332, 340, 44 S.Ct. 515, 68 L.Ed. 1041 (1924), the Court allowed a foreign national to challenge a city ordinance forbidding noncitizens from working as pa......
-
U.S. v. Verdugo-Urquidez
...v. Domenech, 311 U.S. 150, 61 S.Ct. 219, 85 L.Ed. 98 (1940) (trademark rights under multilateral treaty); Asakura v. Seattle, 265 U.S. 332, 44 S.Ct. 515, 68 L.Ed. 1041 (1924) (right of alien to engage in trade under treaty with Japan); Ware v. Hylton, 3 U.S. (Dall.) 199, 1 L.Ed. 568 (1796) ......
-
Factor v. Laubenheimer
...U.S. 453, 475, 11 S.Ct. 897, 35 L.Ed. 581; Tucker v. Alexandroff, 183 U.S. 424, 437, 22 S.Ct. 195, 46 L.Ed. 264; Asakura v. Seattle, 265 U.S. 332, 44 S.Ct. 515, 68 L.Ed. 1041. Unless these principles, consistently recognized and applied by this Court, are now to be discarded, their applicat......
Request a trial to view additional results
6 books & journal articles
-
Mendellín v. Dretke and Mendellín v. Texas: International Law Can't Mess with Texas
...See, e.g. , Kolovrat v. Oregon, 366 U.S. 187, 193 (1961); Cheung Sum Shee v. Nagle, 268 U.S. 336, 346 (1925); Asakura v. City of Seattle, 265 U.S. 332, 340–44 (1924); Hauenstein v. Lynham, 100 U.S. 483, 486 (1879); Chirac v. Lessee of Chirac, 15 U.S. (2 Wheat.) 259, 270–71 (1817); Fairfax’s......
-
Limits on the Use of Force in Maritime Operations in Support of WMD Counter-Proliferation Initiatives
..."national treatment" to nationals of the other State. Such treaties have been held to be self- executing. Asakura v. City of Seattle, 265 U.S. 332, 341 (1924) (holding that the FCN treaty between the United States and Japan "operates of itself without the aid of any legislation"). 120. Unit......
-
Here Lions Roam: Cisg as the Measure of a Claim's Value and Validity and a Debtor's Dischargeability
...(W.D. Pa. Sept. 10, 2013) (relying in part on United States v. Alvarez-Machain, 504 U.S. 655, 669 (1992)).171. Asakura v. City of Seattle, 265 U.S. 332, 341 (1803), amended on other grounds, 265 U.S. 332.172. Volkswagenwerk Aktiengesellschaft v. Schlunk, 486 U.S. 694, 699 (1988) (quoting So......
-
An Unintended Casualty of the War on Terror
...difficult, if not impossible, legal hurdles to be enforceable (what I will call the “exceptionalist approach”).Asakura v. City of Seattle, 265 U.S. 332 (1924).Id. at 340.Id. at 341.Id.; see also Foster, 27 U.S. (2 Pet.) at 254 (confirming that a “different principle” established by the U.S.......
Request a trial to view additional results