Asay v. State
Decision Date | 22 December 2016 |
Docket Number | No. SC16–102,No. SC16–628,No. SC16–223,SC16–223,SC16–102,SC16–628 |
Citation | 210 So.3d 1 |
Parties | Mark James ASAY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. Mark James Asay, Petitioner, v. Julie L. Jones, Etc., Respondent. Mark James Asay, Petitioner, v. Julie L. Jones, etc., Respondent. |
Court | Florida Supreme Court |
Martin J. McClain and Linda McDermott of McClain & McDermott, P.A., Wilton Manors, Florida; and John Paul Abatecola, Estero, Florida, for Appellant/Petitioner
Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Charmaine Millsaps, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, Florida, for Appellee/Respondent
Billy Horatio Nolas, Chief, Capital Habeas Unit, Office of the Federal Public Defender, Northern District of Florida, Tallahassee, Florida, for Amicus Curiae The Capital Habeas Unit of the Office of the Federal Public Defender for the Northern District of Florida
Mark James Asay, a prisoner under sentence of death for whom a warrant has been signed,1 appeals from the summary denial of his second successive postconviction motion.Asay has also filed two petitions for a writ of habeas corpus.We have jurisdiction.Seeart. V, § 3(b)(1), (9), Fla. Const.For the reasons that follow, we affirm the circuit court's denial of postconviction relief.We also deny the petitions for a writ of habeas corpus.
The facts of this case are set forth in Asay's direct appeal:
Asay v. State(Asay I ), 580 So.2d 610, 610–12(Fla.1991).
The jury found Asay guilty of both murders and recommended a death sentence by a vote of nine to three.The trial court followed the recommendation and imposed a sentence of death for each conviction.Id. at 612.The court found two aggravating factors established in connection with both murders: that Asay was under sentence of imprisonment at the time of the murders and had been previously convicted of a capital felony (based on the contemporaneous murder conviction).Id.In addition, the trial court found a third aggravator as to the McDowell murder only: that the murder was committed in a cold, calculated, premeditated manner (CCP).Id.As to both murders, the trial court found Asay's age of twenty-three at the time of the murders to be the only mitigation for his offenses.Id.
On direct appeal, Asay raised seven issues.2This Court summarily denied the first four claims and also found, after some discussion, that no relief was warranted as to the remaining three claims.Id. at 612 n.1, 613–14.On June 21, 1991, this Court denied Asay's motion for rehearing, and the United States Supreme Court denied certiorari on October 7, 1991.Asay v. Florida , 502 U.S. 895, 112 S.Ct. 265, 116 L.Ed.2d 218(1991).
In 1993, Asay filed a motion for postconviction relief3 pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 and an amended motion, raising twenty claims.Asay v. State(Asay II ), 769 So.2d 974, 977–78 & n.5(Fla.2000).4He also filed a motion to disqualify the trial judge from presiding over the postconviction proceedings, primarily based on comments the judge made during Asay's 1988 trial.Asay II , 769 So.2d at 978.The trial judge denied the motion to disqualify and, after holding a Huff5 hearing, summarily denied most of Asay's claims, granting an evidentiary hearing on only the ineffective assistance of trial counsel claims.Id.Following the evidentiary hearing, the trial court denied relief on those claims as well.Id.6Asay appealed the denial of relief, raising six issues.7We denied the appeal, affirming the trial court's denial of postconviction relief.Id. at 989.We denied Asay's motion for rehearing on October 26, 2000.Asay then filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus in this Court on October 25, 2001, raising five claims.8Asay v. Moore(Asay III ), 828 So.2d 985, 989 n.8(Fla.2002).We denied relief on June 13, 2002, and denied Asay's motion for rehearing on October 4, 2002.Id. at 993.
On October 17, 2002, Asay filed his first successive postconviction motion, in which he contended Florida's capital sentencing procedure was unconstitutional pursuant to Ring v. Arizona , 536 U.S. 584, 122 S.Ct. 2428, 153 L.Ed.2d 556(2002).The circuit court denied the motion on February 23, 2004.Asay appealed, and on December 20, 2004, this Court affirmed the circuit court's order.Asay v. State(Asay IV ), 892 So.2d 1011(Fla.2004)(table).Asay filed a petition for writ of certiorari, which the Supreme Court denied on November 2, 2009.McNeil v. Asay , 558 U.S. 1007, 130 S.Ct. 495, 175 L.Ed.2d 377(2009).
On February 11, 2005, Asay filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida, raising eleven claims.9
Asay v. Sec'y, Fla. Dep't of Corr.(Asay V ), No. 3:05–cv–147–J–32PDB, 2014 WL 1463990, *6(M.D. Fla.April 14, 2014).On April 14, 2014, the federal district court found that Asay was not entitled to relief and denied the petition.Id. at *28.A certificate of appealability was entered as to whether Asay received ineffective assistance during the penalty phase because his counsel...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 7-day Trial
-
Reynolds v. State
... ... Moreover, Ring became the cutoff that we set for any and all Hurst related claims. Hitchcock v. State , 226 So.3d 216, 217 (Fla.), cert. denied , U.S. , 138 S.Ct. 513, 199 L.Ed.2d 396 (2017) ; see, e.g. , Asay v. State , 210 So.3d 1, 1522 (Fla. 2016). As a practical matter, a Hurst induced Caldwell claim cannot be more retroactive than Hurst because the rights announced in Hurst serve as the basis for this type of Caldwell claimthe two are inextricably intertwined for the purposes of this ... ...
-
Mosley v. State
... ... Further, we held, based on Florida's independent constitutional right to trial by jury that, in order for the trial court to impose a sentence of death, the jury's recommendation 209 So.3d 1274 for a sentence of death must be unanimous. Id. Further, we have now held in Asay v. State , that Hurst does not apply retroactively to capital defendants whose sentences were final before the United States Supreme Court issued its opinion in Ring ... See Asay v. State , Nos. SC16223, SC16102, SC16628, 210 So.3d 1, 2122, 2016 WL 7406538, at *13 (Fla. Dec. 22, 2016) However, ... ...
-
Lambrix v. State, SC16–8
... ... After the United States Supreme Court issued its opinion in Hurst v. Florida , 136 S.Ct. 616, this Court stayed his execution and permitted supplemental briefing and oral argument in order to fully consider the impact of Hurst v. Florida in this case. In accordance with our opinion in Asay v. State , 210 So.3d 1, 2016 WL 7406538 (Fla. Dec. 22, 2016), we conclude that Lambrix is not entitled to a new penalty phase based on Hurst v. Florida , and our opinion in Hurst v. State ( Hurst ), 202 So.3d 40 (Fla. 2016), and we further reject the other grounds for relief that he raised as ... ...
-
Knight v. Fla. Dep't of Corr.
... ... The Florida Supreme Court affirmed Knights convictions and sentences on direct appeal. Knight v. State , 76 So. 3d 879, 890 (Fla. 2011). The United States Supreme Court denied his petition for certiorari. Knight v. Florida , 566 U.S. 998, 998, 132 ... of reliance on the prior rule, and (c) the effect that retroactive application of the new rule would have on the administration of justice." Asay v. State , 210 So. 3d 1, 1617 (Fla. 2016) (per curiam) (citation omitted). For new constitutional rules involving the death penalty, Florida courts ... ...