Asbury Park v. Hawxhurst
| Decision Date | 16 June 1902 |
| Citation | 52 A. 694,67 N.J.L. 582 |
| Parties | ASBURY PARK v. HAWXHURST. |
| Court | New Jersey Supreme Court |
(Syllabus by the Court.)
Error to supreme court.
Action by Asbury Park against Phineas R. Hawxhurst. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant brings error. Affirmed.
Wesley B. Stout, for plaintiff in error.
John F. Hawkins, for defendant in error.
The case is legally Indistinguishable from that of Association v. Berthall, decided in this court, and reported In 63 N. J. Law, 312, 43 Atl. 887.
The judgment is affirmed.
To continue reading
Request your trial
4 cases
-
Hicks v. City of Bluefield
... ... Law, 312, 43 A ... 887; Hohokus Twp. v. Erie R. Co., 65 N. J. Law, 353, ... 47 A. 566; Asbury Park v. Hawxhurst, 67 N. J. Law, ... 582, 52 A. 694 ... Inappropriateness ... ...
-
Hicks v. City Of Bluefield.
...Twp., 61 N. J. L. 224; Ocean Grove etc. Ass'n. v. Berthall, 63 N. J. L. 312; Hohokus Twp. v. Erie R. Co., 65 N. J. L. 353; Asbury Park v. Eawxhurst, 67 N. J. L. 582. Jnappropriateness of unlawful detainer and ejectment in cases in which the owner of the fee seeks relief against the exercise......
- Lynde v. Lynde
- Gilliland v. Middlesex & S. Traction Co.