Ascentium Capital LLC v. Littell
| Decision Date | 01 February 2022 |
| Docket Number | 2:20-cv-04215-NKL |
| Parties | ASCENTIUM CAPITAL LLC, Plaintiff, v. TED LITTEL, TIMOTHY LITTELL, and WHITE KNIGHT LIMOUSINE, INC., Defendants. |
| Court | U.S. District Court — Western District of Missouri |
DEFAULT JUDGMENT
On December 22, 2021, the Court ordered that Tim Littell's pleadings be struck, and a default judgment entered against him. See Doc. 89. Tim Littell's pleadings have subsequently been struck and a Clerk's entry of Default has been entered. See Doc. 91. As a result, the Court enters a default judgment against Tim Littell.
Since there was no damages calculation in the motion for sanctions, the Court ordered Ascentium to provide the Court proof of its current damages. See Doc. 89. Ascentium alleges in its complaint that is entitled to the unpaid balances on the five agreement, 1.5% monthly interest on the past due amounts, attorney's fees, and costs. See generally Doc. 1.
Ascentium has provided the Court proof of the amounts due under the agreements including prejudgment interest, Ascentium's costs, and Ascentium's attorney's fees. See Doc. 95. Specifically, Ascentium has shown that as of January 4, 2022, it was owed $328, 891.90 under the five agreements plus attorney's fees and costs. Id. Furthermore, since Ascentium is entitled to prejudgment interest on past due amounts, Ascentium has shown it is entitled to $118.85 in interest for every day between January 4, 2022, and the date of judgment.
Consequently, the Court enters a default judgment against Defendant Tim Littell for $328, 891.90 plus $118.85 for every day between January 4, 2022, and the date of this order, plus reasonable attorney's fees and costs.
To continue reading
Request your trial